(a)What does the Tana Kama learn from the two Pesukim in Acharei Mos (with regard to Sh'chutei Chutz) "asher Yishchat" and "asher Ya'aleh"?
(b)What does Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili say? On what condition is one Chayav for Ha'ala'as Chutz"?
(c)Why does he declare him Patur if he first Shechted it outside?
(d)How does the Tana Kama counter that? Why ought he then be Patur even if he first Shechted the animal inside the Azarah?
(e)How does Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili counter that?
1)
(a)The Tana Kama learns from the two Pesukim in Acharei Mos (with regard to Sh'chutei Chutz) "asher Yishchat" and "asher Ya'aleh" that - if one first Shechts a Korban outside the Azarah and then offers it up outside the Azarah, he is Chayav two Chata'os.
(b)According to Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili, he is only Chayav for Ha'ala'as Chutz" - if he Shechted it inside the Azarah.
(c)He declares him Patur if he first Shechted it outside - because he merely sacrificed a Pasul animal outside (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(d)The Tana Kama counters that inasmuch as in that case, he ought to be Patur even if he first Shechted the animal inside the Azarah - since it anyway became Pasul (be'Yotzei) when he took it outside (See Tosfos Yom Tov). Consequently, since the Torah declares him Chayav, by the same token he is Chayav even if he initially Shechted it outside.
(e)Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili counters that by arguing that - if one Shechted it inside the Azarah it had a Sha'as ha Kosher, which it not have if one Shechted it outside.
Mishnah 2
2)
(a)What do we learn from the Pasuk in Tzav ...
1. ... "ve'ha'Basar asher Yiga be'Chol Tamei Lo Ye'achel"?
2. ... " ... ve'Tum'aso alav ve'Nichr'sah"?
(b)What does the Tana Kama now say about a Tamei who eats Kodesh ...
1. ... Tahor?
2. ... Tamei?
(c)On what grounds does Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili disagree with the latter ruling?
(d)What are 'Chayav' and 'Patur' referring to?
(e)On what condition does he concede that he is Chayav Kareis even if he ate Kodesh Tamei?
2)
(a)We learn from the Pasuk in Tzav ...
1. ... "ve'ha'Basar asher Yiga be'Chol Tamei Lo Ye'achel" that - someone who eats Kodshim when he is Tamei (Tum'as ha'Guf [See Tosfos Yom Tov DH 'she'Eino Chayav ... ']), he is Chayav Kareis.
2. ... " ... ve'Tum'aso alav ve'Nichr'sah" that - someone who eats Kodshim when the Basar is Tamei (Tum'as Basar), he is Chayav Malkos.
(b)The Tana Kama now declares Chayav a Tamei who eats Kodesh, irrespective of whether it is ...
1. ... Tahor or ...
2. ... Tamei.
(c)Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili disagrees with the latter ruling - seeing as all he did was to eat something that is Tamei (See Tiferes Yisrael).
(d)'Chayav' and 'Patur' are referring to - Kareis (Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili agrees that he is Chayav Malkos).
(e)He concedes however, that he is Chayav Kareis in the latter case too, even if he ate Kodesh Tamei - in the event that the Tum'as ha'Guf preceded the Tum'as Basar (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
3)
(a)Now that the Tana Kama and Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili are arguing where the Tum'as Basar preceded the Tum'as ha'Guf, which principle serves as the basis of their Machlokes?
(b)What then, is their Machlokes?
(c)What makes Tum'as ha'Guf (over Tum'as Basar) an Isur Kolel?
(d)Why does ...
1. ... the Tana Kama now say that he is Chayav?
2. ... Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili say that he is Patur?
3)
(a)Now that the Tana Kama and Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili are arguing where the Tum'as Basar preceded the Tum'as ha'Guf, the principle that serves as the basis of their Machlokes is - whether 'Isur Chal al Isur' (a second Isur can take effect over an existing one by an Isur Kolel (where the second Isur takes effect anyway in other areas of Halachah) or not ...
(b)The Tana Kama holds that it does, Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili, that it does not.
(c)Tum'as ha'Guf (over Tum'as Basar) is an Isur Kolel - because it takes effect with regard to eating Tahor Kodshim.
(d)The ...
1. ... Tana Kama now says that he is Chayav - because, since Tum'as ha'Guf takes effect in that it forbids him to eat Tahor Kodshim, it also takes effect to render him Chayav Kareis for eating Tamei Kodshim, whereas ...
2. ... Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili says that he is Patur - because he holds 'Ein Isur Chal al Isur', even by Isur Kolel.
4)
(a)Notwithstanding the above explanation of their Machlokes (See previous Tosfos Yom Tov & Tiferes Yisrael), how does the Tana Kama counter Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili ('Tamei she'Achal Tamei, Patur')?
(b)What does he say about a Tahor who eats Tamei?
(c)How does he learn it from "the Pasuk in Tzav "ve'Tum'aso alav ve'Nichr'sah"?
(d)And what does he learn from the Pasuk there "ve'ha'Basar asher Yiga be'Chol Tamei Lo Ye'achel"?
4)
(a)Notwithstanding the above explanation of their Machlokes (See previous Tosfos Yom Tov & Tiferes Yisrael 9), the Tana Kama counters Rebbi Yossi ha'Gelili in that - if a Tamei who eats Tamei is Patur, then a Tamei who eats Tahor should be Patur too, seeing as when he touches it, he renders it Tamei anyway.
(b)He says that a Tahor who eats Tamei - is Patur, because he is Chayav on Tum'as ha'Guf (not Tum'as Basar).
(c)And he learns it from "the Pasuk in Tzav "ve'Tum'aso alav ve'Nichr'sah" - which is referring to Tum'as ha'Guf exclusively.
(d)From the Pasuk there "ve'ha'Basar asher Yiga be'Chol Tamei Lo Ye'achel" he learns that although a Tahor who eats Tamei is Patur from Kareis - he is Chayav a La'av.
Mishnah 3
5)
(a)In which regard is ...
1. ... Shochet ba'Chutz more stringent than Ma'aleh ba'Chutz?
2. ... Ma'aleh ba'Chutz more stringent than Shochet ba'Chutz?
(b)Regarding the former ruling, what do we learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos (in connection with ...
1. ... Sh'chutei Chutz) "Dam Yechashev la'Ish"?
2. ... Ha'ala'as Chutz) "La'asos la'Hashem"?
(c)In connection with the latter ruling, what do we learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos (in connection with ...
2. ... Ha'ala'as Chutz) "Ish Ish ... asher Ya'aleh Olah O Zovach"?
5)
(a)
1. ... Shochet ba'Chutz is more stringent than Ma'aleh ba'Chutz inasmuch as - one is Chayav even if he Shechts with the intention that a person should eat it (whereas Ma'aleh is only Chayav if he offers it to Hash-m [See Tosfos Yom Tov]).
2. ... Ma'aleh ba'Chutz is more stringent than Shochet ba'Chutz inasmuch as - even two people who place the limb on the pyre are Chayav (whereas two people who hold the knife and Shecht it are Patur).
(b)Regarding the former ruling, we learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos ...
1. ... "Dam Yechashev la'Ish" that - even someone who Shechts ba'Chutz on behalf of a Hedyot is Chayav.
2. ... "La'asos la'Hashem" that - one is only Chayav if one offers it up to Hash-m.
(c)In connection with the latter ruling, we learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos (in connection with ...
1. ... Sh'chutei Chutz) "Dam Yechashev la'Ish ha'hu" that - only one person who Shechts ba'Chutz is Chayav, but not two (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
2. ... Ha'ala'as Chutz) "Ish Ish ... asher Ya'aleh Olah O Zovach" (from the extra word "Ish") that even two people who offer up ba'Chutz are Chayav (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
6)
(a)According to Rebbi Shimon, someone who offers up ba'Chutz two or three limbs, one after the other, is Chayav for each limb. What does Rebbi Yossi say?
(b)What does the Tana Kama learn (with regard to the Isur of Ha'ala'as Chutz) from the Pasuk in No'ach "Vayiven No'ach Mizbe'ach la'Hashem"?
(c)What does Rebbi Yossi say?
(d)How does he learn this from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos "Vezarak ha'Kohen es ha'Dam al Mizbach Hash-m Pesach Ohel Mo'ed"? What does he extrapolate from there?
(e)Like whom is the Halachah?
6)
(a)According to Rebbi Shimon, someone who offers up ba'Chutz two or three limbs, one after the other, is Chayav (a Chatas) for each limb (See Tosfos Yom Tov). Rebbi Yossi says that - he is only Chayav one (See previous Tosfos Yom Tov).
(b)The Tana Kama learns from the Pasuk in No'ach "Vayiven No'ach Mizbe'ach la'Hashem" that - the Chiyuv of Ha'ala'as Chutz only applies where he brings it on a Mizbe'ach.
(c)Rebbi Yossi says - on any elevated location, even a stone or a rock.
(d)He learn this from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos "Vezarak ha'Kohen es ha'Dam al Mizbach Hash-m Pesach Ohel Mo'ed" - implying that only the Beis ha'Mikdash requires the Mizbe'ach, but not a Bamas Yachid (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(e)The Halachah is - like Rebbi Yossi.
Mishnah 4
7)
(a)On what condition does the Mishnah include Kodshim Pesulim in the Isur of Ha'ala'as Chutz?
(b)Which two cases might this incorporate besides Lan and Yotzei?
(c)Why are they subject to Ha'ala'as Chutz, despite the fact that Sh'chutei Chutz does not apply to whatever is Pasul bi'Fenim?
(d)What do we learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos (in connection with Sh'chutei Chutz) "La'asos oso la'Hashem"?
7)
(a)The Mishnah includes Kodshim Pesulim in the Isur of Ha'ala'as Chutz - provided they became Pasul ba'Kodesh (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(b)This might incorporate Lan and Yotzei - Nishchat Chutz li'Zemano and Nishchat Chutz li'Mekomo.
(c)Bearing in mind that Sh'chutei Chutz does not apply to whatever is Pasul bi'Fenim, they are subject to Ha'ala'as Chutz - precisely because Bedi'evd 'Im Alu Lo Yerdu'.
(d)We learn from the Pasuk in Acharei Mos (in connection with Sh'chuteiChutz) "La'asos oso la'Hashem" that - whatever is Kasher bi'Fenim exclusively is subject to Sh'chutei Chutz.
8)
(a)What does the Mishnah say about someone who offers ba'Chutz half a k'Zayis of Olah and half a k'Zayis of the Emurim of other Korbanos?
(b)Why is that?
(c)And what does the Tana say about someone who offers ba'Chutz a k'Zayis of the Kometz or of the Levonah? (Which Levonah is he referring to)?
(d)He also includes a k'Zayis of Ketores in this list. To which Ketores is he referring?
8)
(a)The Mishnah rules that someone who offers ba'Chutz half a k'Zayis of Olah and half a k'Zayis of the Emurim of other Korbanos - is Chayav (See Tosfos Yom Tov) ...
(b)... seeing as they are both burned on the Mizbe'ach.
(c)The Tana says - the same about someone who offers ba'Chutz a k'Zayis (See Tosfos Tom Tov) of the Kometz or of the Levonah (of a Minchas Nedavah).
(d)And he also includes a k'Zayis of the Ketores - that is brought each day, half in the morning and half in the afternoon.
9)
(a)The Tana also includes a k'Zayis of a Minchas Kohanim (which is entirely burned) of a Minchas Nesachim and of a Kohen Mashi'ach, in the list. What is a Minchas Nesachim (See Tiferes Yisrael)?
(b)On what grounds is the former included?
(c)What is the Minchas Kohen Mashi'ach?
(d)What is the significance of a k'Zayis in each of the above cases?
9)
(a)The Tana also includes a k'Zayis of a Minchas Kohanim (which is entirely burned) of a Minchas Nesachim - the Minchah that is brought together with one's Korban (See Tiferes Yisrael) and of a Kohen Mashi'ach in the list.
(b)The Minchas Kohanim is included - because it is entirely burned.
(c)The Minchas Kohen Mashi'ach is - the Minchas Chavitin (the tenth of an Eifah brought each day by the Kohen Gadol, half in the morning and half in the afternoon).
(d)The significance of a k'Zayis in each the above cases is - the fact that a k'Zayis is the minimum Shi'ur that can be brought on the Mizbeach.
10)
(a)Rebbi Elazer (or Rebbi Eliezer) disagrees with the Tana Kama's Shi'ur of a k'Zayis (regarding the latter list [from 'ha'Kometz' and onwards]). What does he say?
(b)What is his reason?
(c)What do the Rabbanan say?
(d)On what condition does Rebbi Elazer (or Rebbi Eliezer) concede that one is Chayav for bringing a k'Zayis ba'Chutz?
(e)Why is that?
10)
(a)Rebbi Elazer (or Rebbi Eliezer) disagrees with the Tana Kama's Shi'ur of a k'Zayis (regarding the latter list [from 'ha'Kometz' and onwards] See Tosfos Yom Tov). According to him - the Chiyuv for Ha'ala'as Chutz only applies to someone who offers up the entire Shi'ur ...
(b)... because he holds that a Matir is only Matir (bi'Fenim) if one brings the entire amount.
(c)The Tana Kama maintains - that even a k'Zayis is Matir, provided the entire amount is intact (as we shall see shortly).
(d)Rebbi Elazer (or Rebbi Eliezer) concedes however that one is Chayav for bringing a k'Zayis ba'Chutz - if the remainder of the Matir was brought bi'Fenim ...
(e)... because the k'Zayis completes the Haktarah.
11)
(a)On what condition will the Tana Kama concede that one is Patur even if he brings ba'Chutz more than a k'Zayis of any of the above?
(b)What is the case?
(c)What do we learn from the Pasuk in Vayikra "ve'ha'Noseres min ha'Minchah"?
11)
(a)The Tana Kama concedes that one is Patur even if he brings ba'Chutz more than a k'Zayis of any of the above - if the full amount is not intact ...
(b)... where some of it got lost or burnt before the Haktarah.
(c)We learn from the Pasuk in Vayikra "ve'ha'Noseres min ha'Minchah" that - when the Haktarah takes place, the entire amount must be intact.
Mishnah 5
12)
(a)The Mishnah rules that someone who sacrifices ba'Chutz a Korban in its entirety is Chayav. Based on the Pasuk in Vayikra "al ha'Eitzim asher al ha'Eish", why, if one brings a Kasher Korban on the Mizbe'ach in this fashion, is it Pasul?
(b)What if someone sacrifices the same thing ba'Chutz?
(c)Why is that? Why do we not learn the latter from the former (See Tosfos Yom Tov DH 'ha'Makriv')?
12)
(a)The Mishnah rules that someone who sacrifices ba'Chutz a Korban in its entirety is Chayav. Based on the Pasuk in Vayikra "al ha'Eitzim asher al ha'Eish", if one brings a Kasher Korban on the Mizbe'ach, it is Pasul - because the Basar is a Chatzitzah between the Emurim and the fire.
(b)If someone sacrifices the same thing ba'Chutz - he is nevertheless Chayav ...
(c)... due to the principle 'Miyn be'Miyyno Eino Chotzetz' (the same species is not a Chatzitzah [See Tosfos Yom Tov]).
13)
(a)What if one sacrifices a Minchah whose Kometz ...
1. ... has not yet been taken from it?
2. ... has been taken and then mixed together with it?
(b)What is the reason for ...
1. ... the former ruling?
2. ... the latter ruling?
13)
(a)Someone who sacrifices a Minchah whose Kometz ...
1. ... has not yet been taken from it - is Patur (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
2. ... has been taken and then mixed together with it is Chayav.
(b)The reason for ...
1. ... the former ruling is - because it is not fit to be brought on the Mizbe'ach inside, whereas with regard to ...
2. ... the latter ruling - it is (as we learned in 'ha'Kometz').
Mishnah 6
14)
(a)What role do the Kometz and the Levonah (of a Minchas Nedavah) share?
(b)What does the Tana Kama nevertheless say about a Kohen who brings the one without the other ba'Chutz?
(c)What does Rebbi Elazar (or Rebbi Eliezer) say?
(d)On what condition does he concede that one is Chayav for burning one of them ba'Chutz?
14)
(a)The Kometz and the Levonah (of a Minchas Nedavah) together - permit the remainder of the Minchah to be eaten.
(b)The Tana Kama nevertheless says that a Kohen who brings the one without the other ba'Chutz - is Chayav.
(c)Rebbi Elazar (or Rebbi Eliezer) holds that - he is only Chayav if he brings both ba'Chutz.
(d)He concedes that one is Chayav for burning one of them ba'Chutz - if he first brought the other one bi'Fenim.
15)
(a)What does the Tana Kama say about a Kohen who sprinkles (See Tosfos Yom Tov) some of the blood of a Korban ba'Chutz?
(b)What does Rebbi Elazar (or Rebbi Eliezer) say about a Kohen who performs the Nisuch ha'Mayim on Succos ba'Chutz?
(c)What is his source?
(d)Why does the Tana Kama disagree with him?
(e)Like whom is the Halachah throughout the Mishnah?
15)
(a)The Tana Kama rules that a Kohen who sprinkles (See Tosfos Yom Tov) some of the blood of a Korban ba'Chutz - is Chayav because of Z'rikas Chutz (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(b)Rebbi Elazar (or Rebbi Eliezer) rules that a Kohen who performs the Nisuch ha'Mayim on Succos ba'Chutz too - is Chayav because of Sh'chutei Chutz ...
(c)... because he holds that Nisuch ha'Mayim on Succos is min ha'Torah.
(d)The Tana Kama disagrees with him - because he holds that it is (only) Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(e)The Halachah throughout the Mishnah is - like the Tana Kama.
16)
(a)When Rebbi Nechemyah rules that the leftover blood of a Korban is subject to Z'rikas Chutz, which kind of blood is he referring to?
(b)What is therefore his reason?
(c)Why will he therefore concede that one is not Chayav for placing the blood of Sheyarei ha'Dam of Damim ha'Chitzoniyos?
(d)Like whom is the Halachah?
16)
(a)When Rebbi Nechemyah rules that the Sheyarei ha'Dam (the leftover blood) of a Korban is subject to Z'rikas Chutz, he is referring to - Damim ha'Penimim (the blood that is sprinkled inside the Kodesh).
(b)And his reason therefore is - because he holds that pouring it out (on the Y'sod of the Mizbe'ach) is crucial to the Mitzvah (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(c)Consequently, he will concede that one is not Chayav for placing the blood of Sheyarei ha'Dam of Damim ha'Chitzoniyos - which he agrees is not crucial (if it is not poured out ... )
(d)The Halachah is - like the Tana Kama.
Mishnah 7
17)
(a)What does the Mishnah say about a Kohen who performs Melikah on a bird ...
1. ... bi'Fenim and then sacrifices it ba'Chutz?
2. ... ba'Chutz and also sacrifices it ba'Chutz?
(b)What is the reason for the latter ruling?
(c)Then why is he ever Chayav for sacrificing or Shechting ba'Chutz, (seeing as the animal becomes Pasul be'Yotzei)?
17)
(a)The Mishnah rules that a Kohen who performs Melikah on a bird ...
1. ... bi'Fenim and then sacrifices ba'Chutz - is Chayav.
2. ... ba'Chutz and also sacrifices it ba'Chutz - is Patur ...
(b)... because Melikah ba'Chutz simply renders the bird a Neveilah (and is not an Avodah).
(c)... and the reason that he is ever Chayav for sacrificing or Shechting ba'Chutz (despite the fact that the animal becomes Pasul be'Yotzei) is - because 'Yotzei' is a Gezeiras ha'Kasuv (whereas all other Pesulim are not).
18)
(a)What does the Tana then mean when he says 'It transpires that the way that makes him ...
1. ... Chayav bi'Fenim causes him to be Patur ba'Chutz?
2. ... Patur bi'Fenim, causes him to be Chayav ba'Chutz?
(b)The following is missing from the words of the Tana Kama: 'Similarly, someone who Shechts an animal at nighttime inside and sacrifices it ba'Chutz, is Patur'. Why is that?
(c)From which Pasuk in Acharei-Mos do we learn that a Shechitah that is performed at nighttime is Pasul?
(d)What if he also Shechted it outside?
(e)Why is that?
18)
(a)When the Tana then says 'It transpires that the way that makes him ...
1. ... Chayav bi'Fenim causes him to be Patur ba'Chutz, he means that - Melikah, which if performed bi'Fenim, causes him to be Chayav for Ha'ala'as Chutz, renders him Patur if it is performed ba'Chutz.
2. ... Patur bi'Fenim, causes him to be Chayav ba'Chutz, he means that - Shechitah, which, if performed bi'Fenim, renders him Patur from Ha'ala'as Chutz, causes him to be Chayav if it is performed ba'Chutz.
(b)The following is missing from the words of the Tana Kama: 'Similarly, someone who Shechts an animal at nighttime inside and sacrifices it ba'Chutz, is Patur' - because a Korban that is Shechted at nighttime is Pasul.
(c)We learn that a Shechitah that is performed at nighttime is Pasul from the Pasuk in Acharei-Mos - "be'Yom Zivchachem ... ".
(d)If he also Shechted it outside - he is Chayav ...
(e)... because a Shechitah performed ba'Chutz at nighttime is basically Kasher (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
19)
(a)With which of the Tana Kama's two previous rulings does Rebbi Shimon disagree?
(b)What does he say?
(c)What is he referring to when he adds 'except for someone who Shechts inside and sacrifices outside?
(d)Like whom is the Halachah?
19)
(a)Rebbi Shimon, who disagrees with - the Tana Kama's first ruling ...
(b)... says that just as one is Chayav if one Shechts it outside, so too, is one Chayav if one Shechts it inside (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(c)When he adds 'except for someone who Shechts inside and sacrifices outside', he is referring to - someone who Shechts a bird at night bi'Fenim, who is Patur (even though if he Shechted it outside he would be Chayav) See Tosfos Yom Tov.
(d)The Halachah is - like the Tana Kama.
Mishnah 8
20)
(a)The Mishnah presents a case where a. the Kohen receives the blood of a Korban in one cup, and places some of the blood outside and the leftovers inside, and b. where he does the reverse. What is the Din in the first case?
(b)Seeing as it is obvious, why does the Tana see fit to mention it?
(c)Who is the author of the second case, and what is the case?
(d)On what grounds is the Kohen therefore Chayav for Zerikas Chutz?
(e)What does the Tana then mean when he adds 'because it is all eligible to go inside'?
20)
(a)The Mishnah now presents a case where a. the Kohen receives the blood of a Korban in one cup, and places some of the blood outside and the leftovers inside, and b. where he does the reverse. In the first case - he is Chayav because of Z'rikas Chutz.
(b)Although it is obvious, the Tana sees fit to mention it - on account of the second case.
(c)The author of the second case is - Rebbi Nechemyah, and the case is - where he placed some of the blood inside and the remainder outside.
(d)The Kohen is Chayav for Zerikas Chutz, because Rebbi Nechemyah maintains the leftover blood of Dam ha'Penimim is crucial (as we learned earlier [though it is not Halachah]).
(e)And when the Tana adds 'because it is all eligible to go inside' he means that - even the blood that is sprinkled outside is eligible to be poured inside on the Mizbe'ach.
21)
(a)The Mishnah now discusses the above case, but where a. the Kohen receives the blood in two cups. If the Kohen places the blood of both cups inside, the Tana rules that he is Patur (See Tiferes Yisrael & Tosfos Yom Tov). What does he say in the event that he places both bloods outside?
(b)On what condition will the Kohen even be Chayav to bring two Chata'os?
21)
(a)The Mishnah now discusses the above case, but where a. the Kohen receives the blood in two cups. If the Kohen places the blood of both cups inside, the Tana rules that he is Patur (See Tiferes Yisrael & Tosfos Yom Tov). In the event that he places both bloods outside - he declares him Chayav one Chatas,...
(b)... but two Chata'os - if he remembered in the middle.
22)
(a)If the Kohen brings the first cup inside and the second cup outside, on what grounds does the Mishnah declare him Patur?
(b)Why is he Patur even according to Rebbi Nechemyah, who says that Shirayim is crucial to the Korban?
(c)Should he bring the first cup outside and the second cup inside, he is Chayav on the first cup because of Z'rikas Chutz. What does the Tana say about the second cup?
(d)Why is that?
22)
(a)If the Kohen brings the first cup inside and the second cup outside, the Mishnah declares him Patur - because the first cup renders the second one a reject, which is not poured on to the Y'sod ...
(b)... even according to Rebbi Nechemyah (who says that Shirayim is crucial to the Korban) - because, based on the reason that we just gave, the blood is not considered Shirayim.
(c)Should he bring the first cup outside and the second cup inside, he is Chayav on the first cup because of Z'rikas Chutz, whereas the second cup - actually atones ...
(d)... because the blood that is sprinkled first outside does not render the remaining blood Pasul (like itself).
23)
(a)To what does the Tana now compare the case of two cups of blood?
(b)What does he rule in the event that the Kohen Shechts both animals ...
1. ... bi'Fenim?
2. ... ba'Chutz?
(c)What is the reason for the latter ruling?
(d)And on what grounds does he rule that if the Kohen Shechts the first one inside and the second one outside, he is Patur?
23)
(a)The Mishnah now compares the case of two cups of blood - to a case of someone who designates a Chatas, and who, when it gets lost, designates a second Chatas, at which point the first one is found (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(b)In the event that the Kohen Shechts both animals ...
1. ... bi'Fenim - he rules that he is Patur ...
2. ... ba'Chutz - that he is Chayav for each one ...
(c)... since each one was eligible to be brought inside when it was Shechted (See also Tosfos Yom Tov).
(d)And he rules that if the Kohen Shechts the first one inside and the second one outside, he is Patur - because it is a Chatas whose owner has been atoned for, which must therefore die (in which case it is not eligible to go inside).
24)
(a)What does the Mishnah now say there where the Kohen Shechts the first one outside and the second one inside?
(b)To which of the above cases is he referring, when he concludes that just as the blood of the second one exempts ('Poter') its own Basar, so too, does it exempt the blood of the other one?
(c)From what does it exempt them?
(d)What is the Mishnah coming to teach us?
(e)What is the Din of Chata'os ha'Meisos?
24)
(a)The Mishnah now rules that, there where the Kohen Shechts the first one outside and the second one inside - he is Chayav on the first one, whereas the second one atones.
(b)When he concludes that just as the blood of the second one exempts ('Poter') its own Basar, so too, does it exempt the blood of the other one, he is referring - to where he Shechted them both inside (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(c)It exempts them from - Me'ilah ...
(d)... to teach us that - even though initially both animals are eligible, once it becomes a Chatas that must die (as we just explained), it is no longer subject to Me'ilah (See Tosfos Yom Tov) ...
(e)Chata'os ha'Meisos - are Asur be'Hana'ah but are not subject to Me'ilah.
