(Mishnah): A Seris Chamah Kohen who married a Bas Yisrael permits her to eat Terumah;

R. Yosi and R. Shimon say, an Androginus Kohen who married a Bas Yisrael permits her to eat Terumah;

R. Yehudah says, a Tumtum who was torn and found to be a male does not do Chalitzah, since he is like a Seris.

An Androginus may marry a woman, but he may not be married to a man;

R. Lazar says, [a man] is stoned for Bi'ah with an Androginus, like with a man.

(Gemara - Beraisa): [An Androginus Kohen] feeds [his wife] Chazah v'Shok.

(R. Yochanan): She eats Terumah, but she does not eat Chazah v'Shok.

(Reish Lakish): There are several Kal v'Chomerim for this [to show that she eats Chazah v'Shok]!

Question (R. Yosi bei R. Chaninah, to Reish Lakish): What are several Kal v'Chomerim for this?

Answer (Reish Lakish): Open your palate, and receive [your answer]!

R. Mana: [Reish Lakish] jested with him. (There is no Kal v'Chomer, just it is as clear as if there were a Kal v'Chomer.)

R. Avun: He said a real matter! Terumah, which is not proper for Yisrael anywhere, she eats - Chazah v'Shok, which are proper for Yisrael everywhere, all the more so she should eat!

Chazah v'Shok were proper for Yisrael - when they were liable (Chet ha'Egel), they were taken from them and given to Kohanim everywhere [in a Chulin animal], all the more so she should eat! (Vayikra 7:34 says that Hash-m took them from Bnei Yisrael and gave them to Kohanim. I.e. had they not sinned, they would have eaten Chazah v'Shok of their own Shelamim.)

Suggestion: Just like they were liable, and they were taken from them and given to Kohanim, so if they will merit, they will not returned to them!

Rejection: "Va'Eten Osam l'Aharon ha'Kohen ul'Vanav l'Chok Olam" - just like a Matanah (gift) does not return, so [Chazah v'Shok] do not return.

(R. Yakov bar Acha): These teachings [of R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish] apply to a Bas Yisrael married to a Kohen (and not to an Androginus' wife).

Note: A Mishnah (Zevachim 5:7) explicitly says that a Kohen's wife eats Chazah v'Shok. How could R. Yochanan disagree?! SEFER NIR says that we discuss when she is no longer married to him (e.g. she eats Terumah due to a son from him - SHA'AREI TORAS ERETZ YISRAEL). OHR SOMAYACH (Hilchos Terumos 6:3) says that we discuss an Arusah, according to Mishnah Rishonah, that she eats Terumah after the time for Chupah came.

(R. Yochanan): She eats Terumah, but she does not eat Chazah v'Shok. Reish Lakish said, there are several Kal v'Chomerim for this!

Question (R. Yosi bei R. Chaninah, to Reish Lakish): What are several Kal v'Chomerim for this?

Answer (Reish Lakish): Open your palate, and receive [your answer]!

R. Mana: [Reish Lakish] jested with him.

R. Avun: He said a real matter! Terumah, which is not proper for Yisrael anywhere, she eats - Chazah v'Shok, which are proper for Yisrael everywhere, all the more so she should eat!

Chazah v'Shok were proper for Yisrael - when they were liable, they were taken from them and given to Kohanim.

Suggestion: Just like they were liable, and they were taken from them and given to Kohanim, so if they will merit, they will not returned to them!

Rejection: "Va'Eten Osam l'Aharon ha'Kohen ul'Vanav l'Chok Olam" - just like a gift does not return, so they do not return.