(Mishnah): A rapist, enticer, and a lunatic neither disqualify nor permit eating Terumah. If he is not proper to enter (marry a Bas) Yisrael, he disqualifies.

How is this? If he was a Yisrael who had Bi'ah with a Bas Kohen, she may [still] eat Terumah;

If she became pregnant [from him], she may not eat. If the fetus was cut up inside her, she may eat.

If he was a Kohen who had Bi'ah with a Bas Yisrael, she may not eat Terumah;

If she became pregnant, she may not eat; if she gave birth, she may eat. It turns out that the child has more power [to feed] than his father!

(Gemara) Inference: Rape of a Penuyah (single woman) does not disqualify to Kehunah.

This supports R. Chiyah's teaching, that the wife (a Bas Kohen) of a [Yisrael] Cheresh or lunatic, she immerses from the lap of her husband, and eats Terumah;

It is unlike R. Lazar, for R. Lazar says that even a bachelor who has Bi'ah with a single woman not for the sake of Kidushin, this is Bi'as Zenus [and makes her a Zonah].

(R. Ba citing R. Aba bar Yirmeyah): One who was raped need not wait three months [to avoid a Safek about who is the father. Surely she turned over after Bi'ah so the semen will fall out, and she will not become pregnant!]

(R. Yonah in front of R. Yosah): Do not accept this. (Do not learn from our Mishnah, which permits a raped woman to eat, and is not concerned lest she is pregnant.) It is a leniency of eating Terumah (but we are more stringent about lineage, and she must wait three months, like other women).

If a Bas Kohen was married to a Yisrael, and her husband went overseas, and she heard that he died, does she not eat Terumah immediately, [even though] regarding the fetus (in case she is pregnant) she must wait three months [before remarrying, to avoid a Safek about the father]?!

(Mishnah): If he is not proper to enter Yisrael, he disqualifies.

The following [disqualify] - a male [at least] nine years and a day old [converted] Amoni, Mo'avi, Mitzri or Edomi, slave, Mamzer, Chalal, Nasin, or Kusi... who had Bi'ah with a Bas Yisrael, Bas Kohen or Bas Levi, she is disqualified from Kehunah;

R. Yosi says, anyone whose seed is Pasul, his Bi'ah disqualifies. Anyone whose seed is not Pasul, his Bi'ah does not disqualify;

R. Shimon ben Gamliel says, anyone that you (a Kohen) may marry his daughter, you may marry his widow (she is still Kesherah to Kehunah). Anyone that you may not marry his daughter, you may not marry his widow.

Question: What do [R. Yosi and R. Shimon ben Gamliel] argue about?

Answer (R. Yochanan): They argue about a converted Amoni or Mo'avi. The one who says anyone whose seed is Pasul, his Bi'ah disqualifies - since his seed is Pasul, his Bi'ah disqualifies;

The one who says anyone that you may marry his daughter, you may marry his widow - since you may marry his daughter (females of Amon and Mo'av are permitted), you may marry his widow.

Question: [How do we understand] Chachamim's words?

Answer (R. Yirmeyah citing Rabanan, and R. Ba): [They forbid the widow even when the children are Kesherim, e.g.] the daughter of a converted Amoni or Mo'avi, or the daughter of a Mitzri Sheni. Even though you are permitted to his daughter, you may not marry his widow. (This is unlike R. Yosi, who permits the widow of a Mitzri Sheni, since his children are Kesherim, and unlike R. Shimon ben Gamliel, who permits even the widow of a Amoni or Mo'avi, since their daughters are permitted.)

Question: R. Zachyei Alexandriyah sent a question - the daughter of a converted Amoni and the daughter of a second generation Mitzri (she is a Shelishis, is she permitted to Kehunah? The case is, he married a convert's daughter, who is permitted to him.)

Question #1: R. Yosah: Did he not hear that R. Yirmeyah citing Rabanan, and R. Ba, both of them said that the daughter of a converted Amoni or Mo'avi, or the daughter of a Mitzri Sheni, even though you are permitted to his daughter, you may not marry his widow?

Question #2: And [R. Yosi said that] anyone whose seed is Pasul, his Bi'ah disqualifies! (And R. Shimon ben Gamliel said that if the daughter is forbidden, the widow is forbidden. This connotes that all agree that the daughters are permitted, and they argue only about their widows! We explained this like SEFER NIR.)

Answer (to both questions): [Rather,] he asked about when the mother was a Yisrael (who is forbidden to an Amoni or Mitzri Sheni. Do we say that just like her mother was profaned, her daughter is profaned?

Support: Also, from this (the following, we can say that R. Zachyei was unsure also about whether or not her mother was profaned)! R. Yakov bar Acha said that R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish argue about the daughter of a converted Amoni or the daughter of a Mitzri Sheni - R. Yochanan said that they are Kesheros, and Reish Lakish said that they are Pesulos;

R. Yosi bei R. Bun said that they argue about the mothers - R. Yochanan said that they are Kesheros (like R. Shimon ben Gamliel), and Reish Lakish said that they are Pesulos (like the first Tana).

(Mishnah): A slave disqualifies through Bi'ah, but not due to seed:

How is this? If Reuven was born (1) to a Bas Yisrael from a Kohen or (2) to a Bas Kohen from a Yisrael, and Reuven fathered a child from a Shifchah, the child is a slave;

If [the slave's] father's mother was a Bas Yisrael to a Kohen (case 1), she may not eat Terumah (if Reuven died. Her slave grandchild is not considered seed of a Kohen.)

[If the slave's father's mother was] a Bas Kohen to a Yisrael (case 2), she may eat Terumah (if Reuven died).

(Gemara) Question: What is the source that a slave disqualifies through Bi'ah?

Answer (R. Yochanan citing R. Yishmael): "U'Vas Kohen Ki Sihyeh Almanah u'Gerushah v'Zera Ein Lah" - this refers to [one who had Bi'ah with] someone from whom there is widowhood or divorce, she returns [to eat Terumah]. Someone from whom she cannot be widowed or divorced (e.g. a slave, who has no Kidushin), she does not return.

Question #1 (R. Yirmeyah): If a Shomeres Yavam had Bi'as Zenus [with a stranger], she has no widowhood or divorce from him, yet she returns!

Question #2: R. Yosi did not ask this. Rather, he asked that R. Yochanan contradicts himself!

[When they were learning] Gitin, he said 'why are Kusim (descendants of the Nochrim whom Sancheriv settled in place of the 10 Shevatim that he exiled) Pesulim? (Even according to the opinion that they converted insincerely, because lions were eating them, they later converted properly!) R. Yochanan citing R. Lazar said, it is because a Nochri or slave who had Bi'ah with a Bas Yisrael, the child is a Mamzer (and such Mamzerim married into Kusim);

[Also when they were learning] Kidushin, R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish both said that the child is a Mamzer. (If so, we do not need to learn from "Almanah u'Gerushah" that his Bi'ah disqualifies!)

Answer: Here (in Gitin and Kidushin) he said so in his own name (or in the name of R. Lazar). Here (regarding our Mishnah) he said so in the name of R. Yishmael [who holds that the child is not a Mamzer, but R. Yochanan disagrees,] for Chachamim say that the child is a Mamzer,

R. Chizkiyah did not say so. Rather, he asked that R. Yochanan contradicts himself [and according to R. Chizkiyah's version, we cannot answer like above]!

Question: In Gitin, he said 'why are Kusim Pesulim? R. Yochanan citing R. Yishmael said, it is because a Nochri or slave who had Bi'ah with a Bas Yisrael, the child is a Mamzer;

[Also] in Kidushin, R. Yochanan and Reish Lakish both said that the child is a Mamzer.

And here, he said [also in the name of R. Yishmael, after Bi'ah with] 'someone from whom there is widowhood or divorce, she returns. Someone from whom she cannot be widowed or divorced, she does not return'! (If the child is a Mamzer, we do not need this Drashah!)

Answer (R. Masniya): When I ascended to Sechorah (a place), I heard R. Yochanan and R. Yishmael say in the name of R. Yehoshua "u'Vas Kohen Ki Sihyeh Almanah u'Gerushah v'Zera Ein Lah" - someone from whom there is widowhood or divorce, she returns. Someone from whom she cannot be widowed or divorced, she does not return.'

I said, this is proper - there is no Mamzer according to R. Yehoshua, [who holds] that there is a Mamzer only from a woman for one is Chayav Misah. (I.e. also R. Yishmael said this Drashah according to R. Yehoshua, but he himself disagrees. We explained this like HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)