(Mishnah): If he gave a Ma'amar to each Yevamah, they need two Gitin (each needs a Get) and Chalitzah [to one of them];

If he gave a Ma'amar to one Yevamah, and had Bi'ah with the other, they need two Gitin and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Ma'amar to one Yevamah and a Get to the other, [the former] needs a Get and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Ma'amar to one Yevamah and did Chalitzah to the other, the former needs a Get.

(Mishnah): If he gave a Get to each, they need Chalitzah;

If he gave a Get to one and had Bi'ah with the other, the latter needs a Get and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Get to one and a Ma'amar to the other, [the latter] needs a Get and Chalitzah;

If he gave a Get to one and did Chalitzah to the other, nothing takes effect after Chalitzah.

(Gemara) Question: According to Rebbi, does a Ben Tesha (a minor boy above nine years) have a Ma'amar?

Answer #1: Bi'ah of an adult completes (the Kinyan); his Ma'amar acquires and leaves over. Bi'ah of a Katan acquires and leaves over. [If you will say that] his Ma'amar acquires and leaves over, what is the difference between his Bi'ah and his Ma'amar?! (Rather, he does not have a Ma'amar.)

Answer #2: [If you will say that] his Ma'amar acquires and leaves over, what is the difference between an adult's Ma'amar and a Katan's Ma'amar?!

(Shmuel): [Chachamim] made Bi'ah of a Ben Tesha and a day (i.e. above nine years) like an adult's Ma'amar. Just like you say that they made Bi'ah of a Ben Tesha and a day like an adult's Ma'amar, similarly we should make Chalitzah of a Ben Tesha and a day like an adult's Get.

(Rabanan): Chalitzah of a Ben Tesha and a day is nothing;

Why did they make Bi'ah of a Ben Tesha and a day like an adult's Ma'amar [even though a Katan has no Da'as]? It is because an adult's Bi'ah acquires with or without Da'as. Should we make Chalitzah of a Ben Tesha and a day like an adult's Get, and an adult's Chalitzah does not exempt without Da'as? (I.e. if an adult did such a Chalitzah, it does not exempt.)

(Mishnah): If he did Chalitzah to both, or did Chalitzah to one and gave a Ma'amar or a Get or had Bi'ah with the other, or had Bi'ah with both, or had Bi'ah with one and gave a Ma'amar or a Get or did Chalitzah to the other, nothing takes effect after Chalitzah;

[All] this applies to one Yavam and two Yevamos, or two Yevamim and one Yevamah.

(Mishnah): If he did Chalitzah and gave a Ma'amar or a Get or had Bi'ah, or, if he had Bi'ah and gave a Ma'amar or a Get or did Chalitzah, nothing takes effect after Chalitzah;

This is whether the Chalitzah was at the beginning, in the middle or at the end.

When Bi'ah is at the beginning, nothing takes effect after it. (If Bi'ah is in the middle or at the end, things take effect after it);

R. Nechemyah says, Bi'ah and Chalitzah are similar. Whether they are at the beginning, middle or end, nothing takes effect after them.

(Gemara): There (in Bavel), they say that R. Nechemyah holds that Bi'ah Pesulah exempts.

Rabanan there say that [R. Nechemyah holds that] Bi'ah, whether it is after a Ma'amar or after a Get, exempts;

Rabanan here (in Eretz Yisrael) say that [he holds that] Bi'ah after a Ma'amar exempts, but after a Get, it does not exempt.

Question: Did [Rabanan] not hear that R. Heila, citing R. Yochanan, said that R. Nechemyah, R. Shimon and R. Gamliel said the same matter?! (All hold that Ein Ma'amar after Ma'amar; Chachamim made Bi'ah Pesulah like a Ma'amar. The coming Tosefta is R. Yochanan's source.)

(Tosefta): If there were three Yevamos to one Yavam, and he made a Ma'amar to this one, had Bi'ah with this one, and gave a Ma'amar to the third, R. Nechemyah says, the first needs a Get and Chalitzah, and there is nothing after Bi'ah. (The third does not need a Get for the Ma'amar, even though it was a Bi'ah Pesulah, which is like a Ma'amar);

A Kal v'Chomer teaches this. Chalitzah, which disqualifies from Kehunah (a stringency, even if there was) Bi'ah [Pesulah, and afterwards] Chalitzah, there is nothing after [Chalitzah - a leniency]. Bi'ah, which does not disqualify from Kehunah (it is not considered Bi'as Yevamah l'Shuk, which makes a Zonah - a leniency, even if there was) Chalitzah [and afterwards] Bi'ah, all the more so [we are lenient to say that] there is nothing after [Bi'ah]!

Note: Chalitzah after Bi'ah Pesulah forbids to Kehunah, for it is considered Chalitzah of a Yevamah, for Bi'ah Pesulah is like a Ma'amar, and there is still Zikah. This shows that Bi'ah Pesulah does not exempt, unlike Rabanan there and here. (We explained this like RIDVAZ.)

Rabanan say that all three need three Gitin (one each), and Chalitzah to one of them.