1)
(a)According to Rebbi Meir, Rosh Chodesh Elul is the date for Ma'asar Behemah. What does this mean, and what is Rebbi Meir's reason?
(b)How do Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon learn from the Pasuk in Tehilim "Lavshu Karim ha'Tzon, va'Amakim Ya'atfu Bar, Yisro'u Af Yashiru", that the date for Ma'asar Behemah is Tishrei?
(c)Why does Ben Azai hold that the Elulim must be Ma'asered separately?
(d)What will be the Din according to Ben Azai, if five lambs are born...
1. ... in Av, five in Elul and five in Tishrei?
2. ... in Tishrei and five in the following Av?
1)
(a)Rebbi Meir holds that Rosh Chodesh Elul is the date for Ma'asar Behemah - meaning that those new-born animals born after that date may not be Ma'asered together with those born before it.
(b)Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon explain the Pasuk "Lavshu Karim ha'Tzon, va'Amakim Ya'atfu Bar, Yisro'u Af Yashiru" - like this: "Lavshu Karim ha'Tzon" refers to the animals that are conceived early (in Adar); "va'Amakim Ya'atfu Bar", to those that are conceived later (in Nisan - when the valleys are full of corn), and "Yisro'u Af Yashiru" means that both batches, when they are born (one in Av and the other , in Elul), should combine (from the Lashon of 'Rei'a' - a friend) and be Ma'asered (Ya'shiru - Ya'asiru') together. In other words, the date for Ma'asar Behemah is not Rosh Chodesh Elul, but Tishrei.
(c)Ben Azai holds that the Elulim must be Ma'asered separately - because he is undecided whether the Halachah is like Rebbi Meir or Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon.
(d)According to Ben Azai, if five lambs are born ...
1. ... in Av, five in Elul and five in Tishrei - they cannot be Ma'asered at all.
2. ... in Tishrei and five in the following Av - they are all Ma'asered together in the same pen.
2)
(a)Bearing in mind that Ben Azai's disputants are Rebbi Meir, Rebbi Shimon and Rebbi Elazar, what is the problem with the presentation of his statement ('Ho'il v'Eilu Omrim Kach, v'Eilu Omrim Kach ... '?
(b)Even if, as the Gemara answers, Ben Azai was referring to the same Machlokes between Rebbi Akiva and Rebbi Yishmael, how could he refer to his Rebbe, Rebbi Akiva, in such a lighthearted manner?
(c)How does the Gemara ascertain the relationship between Ben Azai and Rebbi Akiva from the way that Ben Azai addressed him?
2)
(a)Bearing in mind that Ben Azai's disputants are - Rebbi Meir, Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon, who lived long after him, how could he issue a compromise on their opinions?
(b)If however, as the Gemara answers, Ben Azai was referring to the same Machlokes between Rebbi Akiva and Rebbi Yishmael, he was entitled to refer to his Rebbe, Rebbi Akiva, in such a lighthearted manner - because he was not a Talmid, but a Talmid-Chaver.
(c)The Gemara ascertains the relationship between Ben Azai and Rebbi Akiva - from the fact that, in Bava Basra (158b), he referred to him in the second person, and not in the third.
3)
(a)Can animals that are born before the 'Zman ha'Goren' (one of the three designated times of Ma'asering each year) be Ma'asered together with animals that are born after it?
3)
(a)Animals that are born before the 'Zman ha'Goren' may be Ma'asered together with animals that are born after it.
4)
(a)The year of Ma'aser for trees is determined by the time that they bud, and for produce and olive-trees, when the fruit attains a third of its growth (which is when they can first be eaten). How would the first of Tishrei determine the two batches of new-born animals (according to Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon), if Ma'asar Behemah would be compared to ...
1. ... the budding of the trees?
2. ... the third of the growth of the produce and the olives?
(b)Rebbi Shamai compares Ma'asar Behemah in this regard to produce and olive-trees even according to Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon in our Mishnah (who give the dividing date aas the first of Tishrei) - by establishing our Mishnah according to Rebbi Shimon (Rebbi Shimon will then be following his own reasoning). What does Rebbi Shimon say?
(c)What problem does Rebbi Mana have with this from Ben Azai (of our Mishnah)?
(d)How does the Gemara reconcile both Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon, and Ben Azai with even the Rabanan of Rebbi Shimon (See Hagahos ha'Gra) even if they were to go after the time that they became fit to eat?
4)
(a)According to Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon, if Ma'asar Behemah would be compared to ...
1. ... the budding of the trees - then it would not be the animals that were born before or after that date that would divide them, but all those that were conceived (i.e. that the pregnancy was recognizable) before or after it.
2. ... the third of the growth of the produce and the olives (i.e. the stage when they become fit to eat) - then it would be those animals that were born before the twenty-second of Elul (giving them seven days until the first of Tishrei to become permitted to eat - given their status of a Korban) and those born after that which would divide the two batches.
(b)Rebbi Shamai compares Ma'asar Behemah in this regard to produce and olive-trees even according to Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon in our Mishnah (who go after the time the animals are born and give the dividing date as the first of Tishrei) - by establishing our Mishnah according to Rebbi Shimon - who says 'Mechusar Zman Nichnas l'Dir Lehis'aser' (i.e. it doesn't matter if the animals are Ma'asered before the seven days that renders them fit to be brought as Korbanos).
(c)Rebbi Mana has a problem with this from Ben Azai, who says that the Eluliyim must be Ma'asered separately (as we explained above). Now the Eluliyim implies those animals that are born throughout the month of Elul, and it is unlikely that Ben Azai too, holds like Rebbi Shimon. He is more likely to hold the Rabanan, who hold 'Mechusar Zman Eino Nichnas l'Dir'. Nevertheless, he goes after the birth (and not after the time that it is fit to be eaten, as we suggested above.
(d)The Gemara reconciles both Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon, and Ben Azai with even the Rabanan of Rebbi Shimon (even if they were to go after the time that they became fit to be eaten) - by explaining that, Ben Azai is only referring to animals that are born up to the twenty-second of Elul, but those animals that are born between the twenty-second and the twenty-ninth of Elul, must be Ma'asered together with the animals that are born after the first of Tishrei; similarly, according to Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon, those animals that are born from the twenty-second of Elul until the twenty-ninth must be Ma'asered together with those that are born in the following year.
5)
(a)What does Rebbi Yonah's father learn from the Pasuk in Re'eh "Kol ha'Bechor Asher Yivaled ... ha'Zachar Takdish"?
(b)How does Rav Huna learn the same thing from Ben Azai and the Rabanan?
5)
(a)Rebbi Yonah's father learns from the Pasuk "Kol ha'Bechor Asher Yivaled ... ha'Zachar Takdish" - that the Kedushah of a Bechor (that lasts for a year, and during which time the Kohen is permitted to eat it) begins the moment it is born (and not only after seven days, from the time it becomes permitted to eat).
(b)Rav Huna learns the same thing from the Rabanan who combine all the animals that are born during the year (either from Elul to Elul or from Tishrei to Tishrei) - including those that are born at the end of the year (during the last week of the month), even though they are not fit to eat until seven days later.
6)
(a)What was the Lishkah?
(b)They would draw money from the Lishkah and put it into three boxes. How were the boxes marked, and what was the purpose of marking them?
(c)How much did each of these boxes contain?
(d)According to Rebbi Yishmael, the boxes were marked in Greek lettering ('Alpha', 'Beta' 'Gama'). Why was that?
6)
(a)The Lishkah was a room in the Beis Hamikdash where all the half-Shekalim from the boxes were placed.
(b)The Boxes were marked 'Aleph', 'Beis' and 'Gimel' respectively, so that they would know which one to use first, which to use second and which to use last.
(c)Each of these boxes contained three Sa'ah.
(d)According to Rebbi Yishmael, the boxes were marked in Greek lettering ('Alpha', 'Beta' 'Gamma') - based on the Pasuk in Noach "Yaf't Elokim l'Yefes' v'Yishkon b'Ohalei Shem" (from which we derive that the most beautiful aspect of Greek culture - its ancient language - will come to be used in the tents of Shem).
7)
(a)Why did whoever was chosen to empty the Lishkah, take great care not to wear a garment with a hem, shoes or anything else that might serve as a receptacle?
(b)From which two Pesukim do we derive this concept, one in Bamidbar, the other in Mishlei?
7)
(a)Whoever was chosen to empty the Lishkah, took great care not to wear a garment with a hem, shoes or anything else that might serve as a receptacle - in order that no-one should come to suspect him of becoming poor (as a Divine punishment) because he helped himself to the funds of Hekdesh, or that he enriched himself by doing so.
(b)We derive this concept, from the Pasuk in Bamidbar - "vi'Heyisem Neki'im me'Hashem u'mi'Yisrael", and from the Pasuk in Mishlei - "u'Matza Chen v'Seichel Tov b'Einei Elokim v'Adam".
8b----------------------------------------8b
8)
(a)What was the size of the four or five boxes of straw that the Mishnah in Shabbos permits one to empty from the store-house on Shabbos to make room for guests etc.?
(b)From where do we learn this?
(c)How many Sa'ah did they take from the Lishkah annually?
8)
(a)Each of the four or five boxes of straw that the Mishnah in Shabbos permits one to empty from the store-house on Shabbos to make room for guests etc. - was permitted to contain three Sa'ah.
(b)We learn it from our Mishnah - from the boxes with which they emptied the Terumas ha'Lishkah (because it is the way of the Gemara to learn what is unspecified from what is specified.
(c)Each year, they took from the Lishkah (according to the Tiklin Chadtin's explanation) twenty-seven Sa'ah (nine Sa'ah on each of the three designated times in the year).
9)
(a)The Mishnah in Shabbos renders one Chayav for carrying out on Shabbos, sufficient undiluted wine 'to dilute a Kos'. How much is that and from where do we learn it?
(b)How much diluted wine must one carry out in order to be Chayav?
(c)In which regard does the Gemara give the Shi'ur of a Titartun and a quarter?
9)
(a)The Mishnah in Shabbos renders one Chayav for carrying out on Shabbos, sufficient undiluted wine 'to dilute a Kos' - i.e. a quarter of a Revi'is, as we learned in a Beraisa in Pesachim (108b) 'Arba Kosos she'Amru, Yeshnan Revi'is shel Yayin ha'Italki'.
(b)The Shi'ur of diluted wine for which one is Chayav on Shabbos is a mouthful (less than a Revi'is - although in Shabbos, the Korban ha'Eidah gives the Shi'ur as a Revi'is).
(c)One and a quarter Titartun is the equivalent of a Revi'is.
10)
(a)The Gemara asks whether one is Yotzei the four Kosos at the Seder, if one drinks them consecutively (which the Bavli invalidates -Pesachim 108b). What is the answer, and from where so we learn it?
(b)Why is one Yotzei if one drinks each of the four cups in spurts?
(c)Is one Yotzei at the Seder with ...
1. ... Matzah of Shevi'is?
2. ... wine of Shevi'is? Why the difference?
3. ... Konditon (spiced wine)?
4. ... White wine?
(d)How much water may one add to the wine for it to retain its status of wine?
10)
(a)According to the Yerushalmi, someone who drinks the four cups consecutively is Yotzei - and the proof is from Hallel, which need not be repeated at the Seder after having recited it in Shul - in spite of the fact that it was not recited over a cup of wine.
(b)One is Yotzei if one drinks each of the four cups in spurts - because Chazal want the wine to be drunk in such a way that it will not cause drunkenness, and that is precisely what one is doing by drinking it in spurts.
(c)One is ...
1. ... not Yotzei at the Seder with Matzah of Shevi'is (because Matzah must be "Lachem" - see Bavli Pesachim 38a.).
2. ... Yotzei with wine of Shevi'is.
3. ... Yotzei with Konditun (spiced wine) - because it is still called wine.
4. ... Yotzei with white wine - even though it is a Mitzvah to use red wine.
(d)One may add as much as five parts water to the wine for it to retain its status of wine (because up to there, it still tastes like wine).
11)
(a)Why was Rebbi Yonah of all people, the one to permit boiled wine?
(b)A noble-woman theorized that it must be one of three things that caused Rebbi Yonah's face to shine. What were they?
(c)What did he answer her?
(d)When Rebbi Avahu came to Teverya, Rebbi Yochanan's disciples thought that his shining face must be due to his having discovered a treasure. Were they right?
11)
(a)Rebbi Yonah of all people, was the one to permit boiled wine - because he suffered from terrible headaches until Shavu'os (usually Chag means Sukos) if he drank un-boiled wine at the Seder.
(b)The noble-woman theorized that Rebbi Yonah's face was shining either because - he drank wine, or because he lent money on interest, or because he reared pigs (the latter two being sources of easy income).
(c)He replied that it was it was none of those three (two of which are forbidden to Jews anyway), but it was due to the Chidushei Torah that he produced - as Shlomo wrote in Koheles "Chochmas Panav Ansah Bo".
(d)When Rebbi Avahu came to Teverya, Rebbi Yochanan's disciples thought that his shining face must be due to his having discovered a treasure - and they were not far wrong: he had found a new Tosefta that he never before seen, and which contained many Chidushim.
12)
(a)What was the old 'Temunta' measure of Tzipori the equivalent of?
(b)What did Rebbi Yanai's family used to use it for?
(c)Rebbi Yochanan stated that the old half-Sheminis measure of Teverya was the equivalent of a Revi'is. Why did he refer to it as 'old' (according to the text of the Tiklin Chadtin)?
12)
(a)The old 'Temunta' measure of Tzipori was equivalent to the Torah's Lug (six egg-volumes).
(b)Rebbi Yanai's family used to use it for measuring honey.
(c)He referred to it as 'old' (in spite of the fact that he still remembered it) because it was no longer in use.