Which Tavshil is Mitztamek v'Yafeh Lo? Examples are cabbage, peas and ground meat.

(R. Tanchum bar Ilai): Also turnip heads and leek heads, [Chachamim] made them like a Tavshil that is Mitztamek v'Yafeh Lo.

Question: Are eggs [Mitztamek v'Yafeh Lo or Mitztamek v'Ra Lo]?

Answer (R. Yosi citing R. Yishmael bei Rebbi Yosi): My father entered his house and found hot [water] and permitted. He found eggs and forbade (for they are Mitztamek v'Yafeh Lo).

Support (R. Shmuel bar Nasan citing R. Chama bar Chanina): I and my father ascended to Chamas Geder. They brought in front of us eggs [that cooked and shriveled until they were] as small as sorb apples, and they tasted as good as Kafrisin (caper-berry shells).

(Beraisa): A woman may not fill a pot with legumes or lupines (which must cook for a long time) and put them in the Tanur close to dark. If she put, they are forbidden on Motza'ei Shabbos bi'Chdei she'Ya'asu (until the time it would take them to cook on Motza'ei Shabbos).

Opinion #1 (R. Acha): [The Beraisa discusses one who was Meshaheh] b'Mezid, and it is like R. Meir.

Opinion #2 (R. Yosi): [It discusses one who was Meshaheh] b'Shogeg, and it is like R. Yehudah.

Support (R. Mana, for R. Yosi - Beraisa): One who plants on Shabbos - if he was Shogeg, he may keep it. If he was Mezid, he must uproot it. [If he planted] in Shevi'is,] in either case he must uproot it.

R. Yehudah says oppositely - [if he planted] on Shabbos, in either case he must uproot it. If he planted] in Shevi'is,] if he was Shogeg, he may keep it. If he was Mezid, he must uproot it.

What is the reason [to forbid regarding Shabbos, even b'Shogeg]? Benefit from [Melachah on] Shabbos is upon him (if he will keep it).

Summation of support: Here (one who did Shehiyah), since you tell him to wait on Motza'ei Shabbos bi'Chdei she'Ya'asu, it is as if he does not benefit from Shabbos at all. (R. Yehudah enacts lest one benefit from Meleches Shabbos. R. Meir does not. He permits one who was Shogeg to benefit on Shabbos itself - HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)

Question: What is the reason for Rabanan (the first Tana, who forbids Shabbos only if he was Mezid, and forbids Shevi'is in every case)?

Answer #1: [Yisraelim] are suspected of transgressing Shevi'is [so we fine more for it, lest one transgress b'Mezid and say that he was Shogeg - PNEI MOSHE]. They are not suspected of transgressing Shabbos.

Answer #2: People count from Shevi'is (to know the years of Orlah and Revai, so it will be known that it was planted in Shevi'is, and people will come to permit this), but they do not count from Shabbos.

Question: How [is there need for both answers, i.e. only one of the reasons applies]?

Answer #1: If it was planted less than 30 days before Shemitah, and Shemitah entered, if you will say that [we forbid what was planted in Shevi'is] due to suspicion, there is no suspicion (nowadays it is permitted to plant until Rosh Hashanah). If you will say that it is due to counting, there is a count (Shemitah is considered its first year).

Answer #2: If it was planted less than 30 days before the eighth year, and the eighth year entered, if you will say that it is due to suspicion, there is suspicion (he transgressed Shemitah). If you will say that it is due to counting, there is no [problem due to the] count (Sheminis is considered its first year).

[R. Acha, who established the Beraisa to discuss Shehiyah b'Mezid, like R. Meir,] holds like the opinion [that forbids in Shevi'is] due to count. However, according to the opinion that it is due to suspicion, they fined Shogeg due to Mezid. (If so, also Shehiyah on Shabbos, since there is suspicion, he would forbid also Shogeg. We explained this like NO'AM YERUSHALMI.)

If one took [a pot from the oven] during the day, he may return it during the day. If one took it after dark, he may return it after dark.

Question: If one took during the day and Shabbos came, what is the law?

Answer (R. Simon bar Tadai citing R. Hoshayah): If he put it on the ground, he may not move (i.e. return) it.

R. Lazar citing R. Hoshayah: I used to serve R. Chiyah ha'Gadol, and I would bring up for him hot water from the bottom floor to the top floor and return it to the Kirah.

(R. Yirmeyah bei R. Shimon): [It is permitted] even from a Kirah of small heat to a Kirah of great heat.

R. Ami: Many times I sat in front of R. Hoshayah, and I did not hear from him this matter (that R. Lazar said in his name).

Objection (R. Zerikan to R. Ze'ira): He did not hear from him that it is permitted. Did he hear from him that it is forbidden?! (This is no reason not to rely on what R. Lazar said! We explained this like PNEI MOSHE.)

If one [took a pot from the oven] and hung it on a peg or put it on a bench, [what is the law]?

Answer: If the coals that stuck to it are still on it, it is permitted [to return it]. If not (he removed them, this shows that he did not plan to return it), it is forbidden.

(R. Yochanan b'Ribi Maryei): This is if he did not remove his hand from it, but if he removed his hand from it, it is forbidden.

(Mishnah): (A Tanur is an oven wide at the bottom and narrow on top. It retains heat better than a Kirah.) [Even] if a Tanur was heated with straw or stubble, one may not put in or on it.

(A Kupach is a rectangular oven with room for only one pot. on it. It retains heat better than a Kirah, but less than a Tanur.) If a Kupach was heated with straw or stubble, its law is like a Kirah. If it was heated with Gefes or wood, it is like a Tanur.

(Gemara - Bar Kapara): Even putting [food] near [a Tanur] is forbidden.

R. Shamai put near the air of a Tanur.

R. Mana: Bar Kapara taught that even putting near it is forbidden! (R. Shamai had not heard the Beraisa - HA'GAON RAV C. KANIEVSKY, SHLITA.)

R. Mana cursed women who put their clothes over the air of a Tanur.

R. Yudan bei R. Yishmael ruled that in pressed circumstances one may sweep a Tanur, put three rocks and put [a pot] on them, as long as neighbors will not know.

(R. Yosi): In laws of Shabbos, [a Kupach is like a Tanur or Kirah] depending on [with what] it was heated (like our Mishnah says);

In laws of Tum'ah (Kelim 5:2 says that if it is for baking, is like a Tanur. If it is for cooking, it is like a Kirah), it depends on its seal (if it has a hole on top, it is for cooking a pot placed there. If the hole is sealed, it is for baking. We explained this Gemara like PNEI MOSHE.)