Clarification: Which is born with a blemish ...

Clarification (cont.): Because as far as one that became blemished afterwards is concerned, seeing as it is not fit to eat, one counts for it from the time that it became fit to be brought on the Mizbe'ach..

Refuted Proof: One cannot however, bring a proof from here, that Bal Te'acher is applicable with regard to giving the Kohen his due ...

Refutation: Since it is talking here about eating it within the year, which one is obligated to do ...

Source: As the Gemara explains in Perek Ad Kamah (Bechoros, Daf 26:).

Clarification: One cannot really learn anything from here, unless we say that the names of the months were handed down by tradition, one after the other.

Yerushalmi: Indeed, the Yerushalmi (in this Perek, Halachah 2) states that the names of the months came with them from Bavel.

Yerushalmi (cont.): Initially, they were called 'The month of Eisanim' (the strong ones) - on which the Avos were born (Nisan); 'The month of Bul' - where the leaves decay and the land is cloddy (Mar-Cheshvan), the month on which one mixes the fodder for the animals in the house, and 'The month of Ziv (splendor [Iyar]) - when the trees are in full bloom.

Yerushalmi (cont.): But from then on - "And it was in the month of Nisan in the twentieth year"; "And it was in the month of Kislev in the twentieth year", "in the tenth month, which is the month of Teives".

Question: But did he not say 'li'Regalim', and he said earlier that 'If a year passes without Regalim or Regalim without a year, one transgresses Bal Te'acher'?

Answer: In any event, he is not talking about months,

Source: It is a Mishnah in Iduyos (Perek 7, Mishnah 7);

Gemara Sanhedrin: And in the first Perek of Sanhedrin (Daf 12: & 13.) in connection with where they declared a leap-year on the thirtieth of Adar', and where Rav Nachman rules 'Me'ubar ve'Kadosh' ...

Gemara Sanhedrin (cont.): And Rava asks him 'Indeed, between Purim and Pesach there are thirty days, and one starts Darshening the Dinim of Pesach already from Purim, when Rosh Chodesh arrives and one postpones it, people will come to treat Pesach with disdain?

Observation: The Gemara could have asked the same question on the Mishnah in Iduyos.

Implied Question: The Gemara later (on Daf 12.) on the Mishnah 'On the first of Tishri is Rosh ha'Shanah for vegetables', where it does not mention Nedarim as it does in the Beraisa).

Answer: The reason i s because the Mishnah is not speaking about Hafsakah.

Clarification: The Gemara later (Daf 8.) explains that this is Tishri.

Machlokes Tana'im: It is Machlokes Tana'im at the end of Perek ha'Bayis ve'ha'Aliyah (Bava Metzi'a, Daf 118.) in the case of 'whether a Guard of Sefichim in the Sh'mitah-year may donate to do so free of charge'.

Question: Why does the Gemara here ask 'P'shita'?' regarding a matter which is a Machlokes Tana'aim?

Answer: Perhaps one can differentiate, in that, here one cannot suspect to the extent that one can by a Shomer.

Observation: It must be examined whether the Gemara could have answered this question, like it answers another question later on the page, that '[the Mishnah] only lists Rosh Hashanah's that are not incumbent upon the performance of an action.'

Implied Question: We do not say that the money that he paid is an indication (Bava Basra 78. [See Mesores ha'Shas]) ...

Answer: Because we consider the money either a gift or a deposit (See Mesores ha'Shas).

Explanation of Sugya. Question: What the Mishnah says in the Reisha 'On the first of Nisan is Rosh ha'Shanah for he Regalim', which is mentioned S'tam, who is the author?

Answer: The Gemara answers 'It is Rebbi'.

Question: It then asks from the Reisha which states that there are four Roshei Shanim: for kings and for Regalim ... , and in the Seifa Rebbi Elazar and Rebbi Shimon say the first of Tishri. 'This means that the Reisha and the Seifa go according to Rebbi Shimon, and the Metzi'a, according to Rebbi Meir?'

Answer: It goes according to Rebbi - Rebbi is the author of the Mishnah and he learns it according to different Tana'im, and learns the Mishnah S'tam like them.

Question: In that case, that one Tana (i.e. Rebbi) is the author of the Mishnah, and he learns it according to different Tana'im, how can he say that 'There are four Roshei Shanim' when really there are five?

Clarification: It would be fine if the Mishnah had mentioned Rebbi Shimon specifically, since he does not hold that 'The first of Ellul is Rosh ha'Shanah for the animals'.

Clarification (cont.): But now that we say that Rebbi learns it according to different Tana'im, and he learns 'the first of Ellul', because of Rebbi Meir - it transpires that there are five Roshei Shanim?

Answer: Rava therefore says that 'There are four Roshei Shanim according to everyone; according to Rebbi Meir there are four without Regalim, and according to Rebbi, without Ma'aser Beheimah'.

Explanation of Sugya. Question: Even in the daytime, it does not take effect until the second day, according to the opinion (in Beitzah, Daf 19.) that prohibits bringing Nedarim and Nedavos on Yom-Tov).

Answer: To bring the Korban he is actually Chayav at the outset.

Clarification: Rashi explains that he is Chayav to bring the Korban from the time that he declared the Neder, and that he should have brought it on Erev Yom-Tov ...

Clarification (cont.): Because the Regalim were not fixed with regard to actually bringing one's Korban, only with regard to Bal Te'acher, which can take effect the day before as well.

Refuted Reason: Rashi did not mean that one should transgress Bal Te'acher from the beginning of the night preceding the third day ...

Refutation: Since, we find that, according to Rebbi Meir who said earlier (Daf 4:) that one transgresses Bal Te'acher after one Yom-Tov, one only transgresses after the entire Yom-Tov has passed, and likewise, according to the Rabbanan, one only transgresses after all three Regalim have passed.

Proof: And in the second Perek of Beitzah (Daf 19:) the Gemara says that one cannot bring a Todah on Pesach and on Shavu'os, only on Succos ...

Proof (cont.): Implying that if one does bring it on Chol ha'Mo'ed, one has not transgressed.

Reason: And when Rashi says here that 'they take effect the day before, he means that if one is Chayav from before Yom-Tov, then the entire Yom-Tov is counted ...

Reason (concl.): Whereas if one declares the Neder after Yom-Tov has entered, even on the first night, then one does not have the entire Yom-Tov, and it does count as one of the three Regalim.

Implied Question: According to the opinion in Menachos (Daf 68.) that even when the Beis-ha'Mikdash is standing, dawn-break permits Chadash ...

Answer: Nevertheless, the Torah writes "from the day that you bring it (the Omer)" as a Mitzvah ...

Source: As the Gemara says in Menachos, Perek Rebbi Yishmael (ibid.)