Question: The Gemara in Perek Lulav ha'Gazul (Succah, Daf 33:) concludes in connection with Lulav that 'Dichuy Me'ikara is not considered Dichuy'.

Answer #1: One can differentiate between 'Dichuy Me'ikara' with regard to Mitzvos and 'Dichuy Me'ikara with regard to Korbanos.

Answer #2: Moreover, it is different there, seeing as it is possible to rectify the Dichuy (by decreasing the berries on the Pasul Hadas), in which case it is not a proper Dichuy.

Question: What is Rebbi Yochanan coming to teach us in the first Perek of Kidushin (Daf 7:) in connection with 'an animal belonging to two partners', where all three things that we extrapolate from his statement, we have already learned in our Sugya from our Mishnah?

Answer: We can still learn there that the animal can make a Temurah, which has the same Din as the original, even though it (the latter) cannot be brought at all.

Implied Question: And the reason that it does not mention that there ...

Answer: Is because it is only concerned there with matters to connected with Dechiyah.

Question: Why can we not learn from Mechusar Z'man (before eight days), which is not considered Dichuy, even though it is Dichuy Me'ikara?

Answer: Mechusar Z'man is different, in that it was never fit to be brought as any Korban. In fact, its time is fixed to fall due on the eighth day. That is why we cannot learn other forms of Dichuy Me'ikara from it.

Clarification: Rashi explains in a Teshuvah - that even something that is not initially sanctified with Kedushas ha'Guf, only with Kedushas Damim, is Dachuy from ultimately being sacrificed.

Clarification (cont.): That one should not say that Dichuy is confined to something that is sanctified with Kedushas ha'Guf and then rejected from being sacrificed; but Kedushas Damim is not strong enough to become Dachuy.

Question: The Ri asks that every Dichuy Me'ikara is Dichuy be'Damim. That being the case, having said 'Dichuy Me'ikara havi Dichuy', why can we not learn from there that there is Dichuy be'Damim'?

Answer: The Ri explains that we have a case of Dichuy Me'ikara by Kedushas ha'Guf there where one Shechted the Korban and received its blood in a vessel containing water, in which case each drop of blood is Dachuy (as it falls into the water).

Answer (cont.): Consequently, even if at the end, there is more blood than water and it has the appearance of blood, it is Dachuy.

Answer (concl.): Consequently, the Gemara now needs to teach us that Dichuy applies even by Damim too.

Reference: The matter is dealt with adequately in the first Perek of Kidushin (Daf 7:).

Implied Question: Even though it will fall under the under the category of "L'fi Ochlo" at night ...

Answer: Nevertheless, he is not permitted to send his Korbanos (by day), as the Gemara explains in Zevachim (Daf 99:) "Shelamim", ' only when he is complete'.

Clarification: This is not comparable to what we learned earlier (Daf 88:) 'If he forgot before the Zerikah, they are Chayav to bring a Pesach Sheini' (See Hagahos me'ha'Rav Renshberg).