(Mishnah): If she said 'Konam these figs and grapes, I will not taste [them]', and he affirmed regarding figs, the entire vow is affirmed;

If he annulled regarding figs, it is not annulled until he annuls even for grapes.

If she said 'Konam figs that I will not taste, and grapes that I will not taste, these are two vows.

(Gemara): Some teach "Yekimenu" (it is as if it says Yakim) Mimenu (he affirms part, and it is as if he totally affirmed) v'Yeferenu Mimenu (he annuls part; we learn Hafarah from Kiyum). And some teach "Yekimenu" (this connotes) all of it, Yeferenu - all of it.

Some teach "Yekimenu" (it is as if it says Yakim) Mimenu, v'Yeferenu all of it (like it connotes; we do not equate it to Kiyum). And some teach "Yekimenu" - all of it (like it connotes), Yeferenu - Mimenu (for a vow that is partially Batel is totally Batel).

Our Mishnah is like the opinion Yekimenu Mimenu, v'Yeferenu - all of it, for it says that if he affirmed for figs, the entire vow is affirmed. If he annulled for figs, it is not annulled until he annuls even for grapes.

Implied question: If she said 'Konam figs that I will not taste, and also a grape' [what is the law]?

Answer: R. Yishmael and R. Akiva argue about this. R. Yishmael says that the law depends on [when] the Neder [takes effect - above 3:6, regarding a vow from seafarers to take effect after 30 days, and they became land dwellers during that time, and below in Halachah 9, about one who vowed to be a Nezirah after 30 days, and her marital status changed within that time. Here, her vow about a grape takes effect only after she transgresses and eats figs, so it is like two vows; he can annul one of them.] R. Akiva says, it depends on [when she said] the Isur. (She said them together, so the one who holds that partial Hafarah does not work, like our Mishnah, it does not work. We explained this like TAL TORAH.)