"Eileh Ta'asu la'Hashem ? L'vad mi'Nidreichem ve'Nidvoseichem". Which Nedarim and Nedavos is the Torah referring to?
Rashi: It refers both to Nedarim and Nedavos that one undertakes on Yom-Tov itself - which is a Mitzvah - and to Nedarim and Nedavos that one undertook to bring during the year. 1
Targum Yonasan, Sifri, Temurah, 14b and Yerushalmi, Rosh Hashanah, 1:1: It refers declares on Yom-Tov itself. 2
Rashi: Which one is advised to bring when one comes to Yerushalayim on Yom-Tov, in case he does not manage to make the trip later.
See Torah Temimah, note 30, who elaborates. Yerushalmi, ibid.: And "Eileh Ta'asu ? " teaches us that, not only is one permitted to bring them on Chol ha'Moe'd, but that one is obligated to do so.
?Eileh Ta?asu la?Hashem be?Mo?adeichem. Why does the Torah insert the word ?la?Hashem??
R. Bachye #1: With reference to 29:12:1:1 - the Torah repeats it at the end of the Parshah placing the seventy bulls in the middle, to emphasize that one should have in mind the One G-d exclusively throughout.
"Eileh Ta'asu la'Hashem ? L'vad mi'Nidreichem ve'Nidvoseichem". Which Nedarim and Nedavos is the Torah referring to?
Rashi: It refers both to Nedarim and Nedavos that one undertakes on Yom-Tov itself - which is a Mitzvah - and to Nedarim and Nedavos that one undertook to bring during the year. 1
Targum Yonasan, Sifri, Temurah, 14b and Yerushalmi, Rosh Hashanah, 1:1: It refers specifically to Nedarim and Nedavos that one undertakes on Yom-Tov itself. 2
Rashi: Which one is advised to bring when one comes to Yerushalayim on Yom-Tov, in case he does not manage to make the trip later.
See Torah Temimah, note 30, who elaborates. Yerushalmi, ibid.: And "Eileh Ta'asu ? " teaches us that, not only is one permitted to bring them on Chol ha'Moe'd, but that one is obligated to do so.
What are the implications of the word "be'Mo'adeichem"?
Pesachim, 77a: It implies "be'Mo'adeichem" 'Afilu be'Shabbos'; "be'Mo'adeichem" - 'Afilu be'Tum'ah'. Regarding all Korb'nos Tzibur that have a fixed time. 1
Rosh Hashnah, 4b: It implies that the Musafim of all the Mo'adim are conneted - inasmuch as they all atone for Tum'as Mikdash ve'Kodashav. 2
Yerushalmi Rosh Hashanah, 1:1: It implies that the La'av of Bal Te'acher does not apply untl all the Yamim-Tovim of the year have passed.
? ? le?Oloseichem, u?le?inchosichem, u?le?Niskeichem, u?le?Shalmeichem?. Why does the Torah place the Menachos and the Nesachim in between the Olos and the Shelamm?
R. Bachye: The Torah begins with the Olos, which always take precedence, 1 and ends with Shelamim, which complete the Midos, and which always conclude the list of Korbanos. 2 Moreover, it is befitting to conclude with the Shelamim, because the Midah of Shalom is great?.
R Bachye: As Chazal Darshen, in Yoma 39a - commenting on Vayikra 6:5 ?Ve?arach alehah ha?Olah? - ?ha?Olah?, ?Olah Rishonah?.
R. Bachye: See for example Vayikra 7:37.
Having written "Nidreichem ve'Nidvoseichem", why does the Torah insert "le'Oloseichem u'le'Minchoseichem, u'le'Shalmeichem"?
Temurah, 14b: 'Oloseichem" refers to the Olah of a Yoledes and the Olah of a Metzora, "Minchoseichem", to the Minchah of a Chotei 1 and the Minchah of a Sotah, and 'Shimeichem", to Shalmei Nazir (all of which are obligatory).
Menachos, 104b: "l'Oloseichem" and "u'le'Shalmeichem" (plural) teaches us that two people may bring an Olah or a Shelamim between them.
Of a Korban Olah ve'Yoreid. See Torah Temimah, note 38 who changes the text from 'Minchas Kena'os' to 'Minchas Chotei'.
Having written "Nidreichem ve'Nidvoseichem", why does the Torah insert "u'le'Niskeichem"?
