What are the two current Pesukim - 11 &12 coming to teach us?
Rashi: Still with reference to a Ba'al-Mum, 1 the Torah is teaching us that a Kodshim Ba'al-Mum cannot be redeemed (to go out to Chulin) unless it obtains a blemish and is assessed by the Kohen.
Temurah, 33b: It teaches us that if a Hekdesh animal became a Ba?al-Mum, it must be stood before the Kohen to assess it, and is then redeemed, and the money used to purchase another Korban.
Rashi: Which the Torah calls 'Teme'ah', because it cannot be sacrificed (and because it also incorporates a dead animal - Sifra. See Torah Temimah, note 57). Temurah, 32b: It cannot be taken literally to mean a Tamei species of animal, since the Torah discusses that in Pasuk 27. See Torah Temimah, note 57.
What are the implications of the words "Asher Lo Yakrivu mimenu Korban la'Hashem"?
Temurah, 33a: It implies an animal that will never be eligible as a Korban ? to preclude an animal with a temporary blemish ? from the Din of Pidyon.
What are the implications of the words "Vehe'emid ha'Beheimah ... "?
Rashi (in Shevu'os, 11b): It implies that the animal must stand 1 on its four legs whist it is being assessed.
Why does the Torah repeat the word "Vehe?emid es ha'Beheimah <i>Lifnei Hashem"?
Menachos, 100b: To teach us that the Din of redeeming Hekdesh that became blemished is confined to animals, but birds, wood, frankincense and K'lei Shareis that became Tamei cannot be redeemed.
