Sifra: It includes animals, whom, one may feed Karshinai Terumah ? vetch (a kind of animal food that humans also eat). ¹

Rashi #1 and Targum Yonasan: It implies an Eved Cana'ani, whose body the owner acquires ¹ - as opposed to the Eved in the previous Pasuk, whose body he does not acquire (and it applies also to the Kohen's wife ² ? Rashi). ³

Kesuvos, 57b: It incorporates an Arusah ? whom the Kohen betrothed. ⁴

Yevamos, 65a: It precludes the wife of a Kohen who is a Cheresh, who cannot acquire min ha'Torah, and whom he only acquired mi'de'Rabbanan. ⁵

Yevamos, 58: It precludes a Shomeres Yavam, who is not his acquisition but that of his brother. ⁶

Gitin, 42b: It precludes an Eved Cana'ani whom his master declared Hekdesh or Hefker and who is therefore obligated to give a Get Shichrur (a document of freedom). ⁷

Rashi #1: It refers to the children of the Kohen's Shifchah Cana'anis. ¹

Rashi #2 (in Nidah, 43b): It refers to the baby whom a Bas-Yisrael bore from a Kohen who died before the baby's birth, who subsequently permits his mother to eat Terumah from the day he is born. ²

Yevamos, 67a: In order to extrapolate 'Y'lud Ma'achil, she'Eino Y'lud Eino Ma'achil' ? to preclude a fetus in the womb of a Bas Yisrael, who married a Kohen who died before the baby was born, who does not feed his mother Terumah. ¹

Gitin, 43a: To permit the baby of a Shifchah Cana'anis who is worth nothing ¹ to eat Terumah ? whom we would otherwise forbid due to the juxtaposition of "Y'lid Beiso"to "Kinyan Kaspo", who is not permitted to eat Terumah if he is worth nothing at the time of sale.

Gitin, 43a: It teaches us that an Eved Cana'ani whom a Kohen purchased, but who is now worth nothing ¹ may eat Terumah, just like one who is born to one's Shifchah Cana'anis who is worth nothing, ²

Sifra; It precludes animals, whom one may not feed Terumah that is fit for human consumption. ¹

Oznayim la'Torah: To incorporate "Kinyan Kaspo" ? to confine the concession for him to eat Kodesh to Terumah ? since we might otherwise have thought that he is premitted to eat even Kodshim Kalim.

Sifra: It precludes a Meis, who does not own bread, and whom one may not therefore anoint with oil of Terumah.

Oznayim la'Torah: When forbidding Terumah to a Zar, it refer to it as "Kodesh" , and when permitting it to the members of the KOhen;s household, it refers to it as "Lachmo", thereby hinting at the reason behind the respective Isur and Heter.

Moshav Zekenim citing R. Eliezer mi'Mitz: Ula relies on the Sifra. He extrapolates that also an Arusah ¹ is Kinyan Kaspo from the Sifra's Drashah on "Kol Tahor 'be'Veischa." ²