"Rak Eitz aasher Teida ? oso Sashchis Vechara'ta". What is the Torah coming to permit?
Ramban 1 : It is giving precedence to cutting down a non-fruit bearing tree to a fruit-bearing one.
Refer to 20:19:6:2**.
Why does the Torah insert the (otherwise superfluous) words "Eitz asher Teida"?
Seforno: To teach us that, even a species of fruit-tree, if one knows that, due to old age or damage, it is no longer capable of bearing fruit, one is permitted to cut it down when laying siege.
Rashbam: Refer to 20:20:1.1:1.
Bava Kama, 91b: "Eitz asher Teida" is referring to a fruit-tree, and "Ki Lo Eitz Ma'achal Hu", to a non-fruit-bearing tree - to teach us that one is permitted to cut down either of them if necessary.
Having taught us the concession to cut down a fruit-bearing tree in order to lay siege, why does it need to permit also a non-fruit-bearing tree?
Rashbam: In order to permit cutting down species of non fruit-bearing trees even if they grow far from the town that is being besieged 1 - but not fruit-trees.
Bava Kama, 91b: In order to give precedence to cutting down a non-fruit bearing tree over a fruit-tree wherever possible.
What is the word "Rak" coming to preclude?
Bava Kama, 71b: It precludes there where the non fruit-bearing tree is more valuable than the fruit-tree, in which case it is permitted to cut down the fruit-tree first. 1
Refer also to 20:20:3:2***.
What is the meaning of "Ad Ridtah"?