1) TOSFOS DH Pigel b'Davar ha'Na'aseh bi'Fnim Lo Pigel
úåñôåú ã"ä ôéâì áãáø äðòùä áôðéí ìà ôéâì
(SUMMARY: Tosfos resolves this with R. Yosi's teaching in Gitin.)
äà ãà''ø éåñé âåôéä áôø÷ äðæ÷éï (âéèéï ðã: åùí) ëä''â áéåä''ë éåëéç ãëé àîø ôéâåì îäéîï
(a) Implied question: R. Yosi himself in Gitin (54b) said that the Kohen Gadol on Yom Kipur proves (that one witness is believed about Isurim), for if he says that he was Mefagel (the inner goat or Par) he is believed (even though no one else could know, for no one else may be in the Heichal at the time)!
ìàå ãå÷à àìà ôñåì
(b) Answer: [Pigul] is not precise. Rather, it is Pasul.
åëé äàé âååðà áô''÷ ãæáçéí (ãó éã. åùí) (âîøà) [ö"ì âáé - öàï ÷ãùéí] ø''ù îëùø áäéìåê ãàîø ø''ù áï ì÷éù îåãä ø''ù áäåìëú çèàåú äôðéîéåú ëå'
(c) Support: We find like this in Zevachim (14a) regarding "R. Shimon is Machshir [improper intent] in Holachah." Reish Lakish said that R. Shimon agrees about Holachah of inner Chata'os...
åôøéê åäàîø ø''ù ëì ùàéðå òì îæáç äçéöåï ëå' åîùðé îåãä äéä ø''ù ìôñåì î÷''å ëå'
1. [The Gemara] asks that R. Shimon said that anything that is not [offered] on the outer Mizbe'ach..., and answers that R. Shimon agrees that it is Pasul from a Kal v'Chomer.
2) TOSFOS DH ha'Kometz veha'Levonah
úåñôåú ã"ä ä÷åîõ åäìáåðä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos questions the Chidush of this.)
ä÷ùä á÷åðè' ôùéèà ã÷åîõ ìà îéçééá òìéä ëøú îùåí ôéâåì ãäà àé àëéì îéðéä ô÷ò ìéä ôéâåìéä ùäøé ìà ÷øá äîúéø
(a) Question (Rashi): Obviously, one is not Chayav Kares for the Kometz due to Pigul, for if one eats it, the Pigul is uprooted, for the Matir was not offered!
åúéøõ ëâåï ùäåöú äàåø áøåáå ãçùéá ëîàï ã÷øá ëãàîø ì÷îï (ãó ëå:) îàéîúé îúéø ùéøééí áàëéìä îùäåöú äàåø áøåáå
(b) Answer: The case is, the majority caught fire. It is considered as if it was offered, like it says below (26b) "from when are the Shirayim permitted? It is from when the majority caught fire.
å÷ùä ìôé' ãàé äåöú äàåø áøåáå ô÷ò ôéâåì îîðå åàôé' ôìâéä îçéú ààøòà åôìâà àñ÷é' ìîòøëä åîùìä áå äàåø îñ÷éðï ìéä ìëúçìä ëãàîø áñåó ôø÷ á''ù (æáçéí ãó îâ:)
(c) Question: If the majority caught fire, Pigul is uprooted from it, and even if half is resting on the ground and half he brought up on the Ma'arachah and it caught fire, we bring up [the rest onto the Ma'arachah] l'Chatchilah, like it says in Zevachim (43b)!
3) TOSFOS DH veha'Levonah
úåñôåú ã"ä åäìáåðä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why it is not considered to have Matirim.)
áôø÷ á''ù (âí æä ùí.) îôøù îùåí ãàéï ìäí îúéøéï ìàãí åìà ìîæáç
(a) Citation: In Zevachim (43b), it explains that it is because nothing is Matir [Levonah] to people or to the Mizbe'ach.
åà''ú åäøé ÷åîõ îúéøä
(b) Question: The Kometz permits it!
åàò''ô ùéëåì ìä÷èéøä ÷åãí ÷åîõ ëãîåëç ìòéì (ãó éâ:)
1. Implied question: [This cannot be, for] one can be Maktir [the Levonah] before the Kometz, like is proven above (13b)!
÷åãí ä÷îéöä îéäà àéï ìä÷èéøä
2. Answer: In any case, one may not be Maktir it before Kemitzah was taken.
åé''ì ãî''î ìà äåéà ìáåðä ãåîéà ãùìîéí ãìáåðä äéà âåôä îúéø ùîúøú ùéøéí áàëéìä åòé÷ø ôéâåì éìôéðï îùìîéí
(c) Answer #1: In any case, Levonah is unlike Shelamim, for Levonah itself permits - it permits eating the Shirayim, and the primary Pigul we learn from Shelamim (Zevachim 44a).
åàò''â ãùééê ôéâåì áàéîåøéí (ãëîä) [ö"ì åëîä - öàï ÷ãùéí] ãìà î÷èøé àéîåøéí ëäðéí áùø ìà îöå àëìé
1. Implied question: Pigul applies to Eimurim (of Shelamim), and (they are like a Matir, for) as long as they are not Maktir the Eimurim, Kohanim may not eat the meat!
î''î ìà çùéáé îúéø ëéåï ãàí ðèîàå àå ðàáãå ùøé áùø áàëéìä
2. Answer: In any case it is not considered a Matir, since if they became Tamei or lost, one may eat the meat.
åòé''ì ãìáåðä àéï ìä îúéø áòáåãú îæáç åìà äåéà ãåîéà ãùìîéí ùòáåãú îæáç îúéøï ëâåï æøé÷ú ãí
(d) Answer #2: No Avodah of the Mizbe'ach permits Levonah. It is unlike Shelamim, for Avodas Mizbe'ach permits Shelamim, e.g. Zerikas Dam.
4) TOSFOS DH Minchas Nesachim
úåñôåú ã"ä îðçú ðñëéí
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses without this is in the text of the Mishnah.)
áô' á''ù (â''æ ùí.) ôé' ä÷åðèøñ ãìà âøñ îðçú ðñëéí îùåí ãôìéâé áä áñéôà ãäê îùðä (ãáùø) [ö"ì ãáúø - ãôåñ åéðéöéä] åäãí ÷úðé åäðñëéí äáàéí áôðé òöîï ãáøé ø''î åçë''à àó ááàéï òí äáäîä
(a) Version #1 (Rashi in Zevachim 43a): The text does not say Minchas Nesachim, because [Tana'im] argue about it in the Seifa of this Mishnah. After "and blood" it teaches "and Nesachim that come by themselves - R. Meir says so. Chachamim say, even [Nesachim] that come with the animal";
åáôðé òöîï ã÷àîø äééðå áéï áîúðãá ðñëéí ëãàîøéðï îúðãá àãí îðçú ðñëéí áëì éåí áéï ááàéï òí äáäîä ëâåï ùäáéà æáçå äéåí åðñëéå îëàï òã é' éîéí
1. "By themselves", this is whether he volunteers Nesachim, like we say "one may volunteer Minchas Nesachim every day", or whether they come with the animal, e.g. he brought his animal today and the Nesachim in the next 10 days.
åîéäå éù ìééùá äâéøñà ãîðçú ðñëéí îééøé áîúðãá îðçú ðñëéí áëì éåí åðñëéï äáàéï áôðé òöîï îééøé áîáéà æáçå äéåí åðñëéå îëàï òã é' éîéí
(b) Version #2: We can defend the text Minchas Nesachim. It discusses one who volunteers Minchas Nesachim every day. "Nesachim that come by themselves" refers to one who brings his animal today and the Nesachim in the next 10 days.
àáì ÷ùä ùìà äéä ìå ìäôñé÷ áãí åäëé ä''ì ìîéúðé åäãí åîðçú ðñëéí åðñëéí äáàéï áôðé òöîï
(c) Question: Why did [the Tana] interrupt with "and the blood" (in between teaching "Minchas Nesachim" and the argument about it)? He should have taught "and the blood, and Minchas Nesachim, and Nesachim that come by themselves"!
åùîà àééãé ãúðà îðçú ëäðéí åîðçú ëäï îùéç úðà îéã îðçú ðñëéí:
(d) Answer: Perhaps Since he taught Minchas Kohanim and Minchas Kohen Mashi'ach, he taught immediately Minchas Nesachim (even though due to this, "and the blood" interrupts) between Minchas Nesachim and the argument about this).
14b----------------------------------------14b
5) TOSFOS DH ha'Kasiv Asa'an Guf Echad
úåñôåú ã"ä äëúåá òùàï âåó àçã
(SUMMARY: Tosfos gives the sources that they are like one, and like two.)
ãëúéá (åé÷øà ëâ) úáéàå ìçí úðåôä åäëúåá òùàï ùðé âåôéï ãëúéá (ùí) ùúéí ùðé òùøåðéí
(a) Explanation: It says "Tavi'u Lechem Tenufah", and the verse made them two bodies, for it says "Shetayim Shnei Esronim";
åñãøéí ãìçí äôðéí éìôéðï îùúé äìçí àôé' ìîàï ãìà éìéó îìúà îîìúà ãäëà ãîå àäããé èôé
1. We learn from the Sedarim of Lechem ha'Panim from Shtei ha'Lechem, even according to the opinion that we do not learn a matter from another, for here they are more similar to each other.
6) TOSFOS DH Pigel b'Lachmei Todah Mahu
úåñôåú ã"ä ôéâì áìçîé úåãä îäå
(SUMMARY: Tosfos points out another question that he could have asked.)
äãéï ãäåä îöé ìîáòé áø÷é÷é ðæéø ùéù ùðé îéðéï
(a) Observation: He could have asked about wafers of a Nazir, for there are two kinds.
7) TOSFOS DH Shechitah u'Zerikah Travihu Matirin Hen
úåñôåú ã"ä ùçéèä åæøé÷ä úøååééäå îúéøéï äï
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains that since Shechitah is Mekadesh, it is a like a Matir.)
ôéøù á÷åðèøñ ùäùçéèä î÷ãùú àú äãí åàîøéðï (áñåó ôéø÷éï) [áôø÷ ëì äîðçåú] ãáà ì÷ãù ëáà ìäúéø ãîé
(a) Explanation (Rashi): Shechitah is Mekadesh the blood, and we say below (63a) that one who comes to be Mekadesh is like one who comes to permit.
åà''ú ÷áìä ðîé î÷ãùú àú äãí áëìé ùøú
(b) Question: Also Kabalah is Mekadesh the blood in a Kli Shares!
ìàå ôéøëà äéà ããí ñëéï î÷ãùà ìéä ëãàîøéðï áñåó ôéø÷éï:
(c) Answer: That is not difficult. The knife is Mekadesh the blood, like we say below (16a).