1)

(a)Shmuel in the name of Rebbi Eliezer learns from "ve'la'Minchah" - that all Kodshei Kodshim, like the Minchah, may only be eaten by male Kohanim. Note; all the current D'rashos are based on the fact that the Torah lists all the categories of Korbanos in this Pasuk, creating a Hekesh (comparing all the Korbanos to the one that is quoted).

(b)This Limud cannot pertain to Chatas ve'Asham - since the Torah has already written this Halachah there explicitly.

(c)The Beraisa learns from the Pasuk in Korach "be'Kodesh ha'Kodashim Tochlenu; Kol Zachar Yochal oso" - that it also applies to Zivchei Shalmei Tzibur.

(d)Those who learn it from "ve'la'Minchah" - disagree with those who learn it from the Pasuk in Korach.

2)

(a)Shmuel learns from "ve'la'Chatas" - that whatever absorbs any hot Kodshim has the same Din as something that absorbs a hot Chatas (which the Torah has explicitly taught us, adopts the Din of a Chatas).

(b)From "ve'la'Asham" he learns that the Sh'fir - (fetus) and Shilya (placenta) of Kodshim are not automatically Kodesh.

(c)He knows that the Sh'fir and Shilya of an Asham are not Kodesh - from the fact that the Asham, which is a male, cannot give birth.

(d)Besides 'Danin Efshar mi'she'I Efshar', this D'rashah is based on the principle - 'Kodshim be'Havayasan Hein Kedoshim' (Kodshim become sanctified only from birth [and not earlier]).

3)

(a)From "ve'la'Milu'im" Shmuel learns that the leftovers of Kodshim need to be burned, as the Torah writes there "Ve'sarafta es ha'Nosar ba'Eish" - incorporating leftover flesh and loaves - but not live animals (e.g. Mosar Chatas) which are not burned.

(b)And he learns from "ve'li'Shelamim" that all Korbanos are Mefaglin u'Mispaglin. 'Mefaglin' means that all Korbanos, like Shelamim, are subject to Pigul. 'Mefaglin' vis-a-vis ...

1. ... Shelamim means - that a Machsheves Pigul on a Todah is Mefagel the Lechem too.

2. ... other Korbanos, with reference to the Kivsei Atzeres, means - that a Machsheves Pigul on the Kivsei Atzeres is Mefagel the Sh'tei ha'Lechem as well.

(c)A Beraisa quoting Rebbi Akiva, learns from "ve'la'Minchah" that just as a Minchah sanctifies whatever absorbs it when it is hot, so do all Korbanos. The problem with this is - that we just learned this from "ve'la'Chatas".

(d)We answer that both Pesukim in fact, are necessary. We would not otherwise have learned ...

1. ... Chatas from Minchah - because maybe it is because the latter is soft that, when it is hot, it gives whatever it touches the Din of a Minchah (but a Chatas, which is not soft, perhaps doesn't).

2. ... Minchah from Chatas - because maybe it is because meat is fatty that it penetrates whatever it touches and gives it the Din of a Chatas (but a Minchah may well not).

4)

(a)In fact, Rebbi Akiva learns three things from "ve'le'Chatas", 'Chulin, ba'Yom' - and 'be'Yado ha'Yemanis'.

(b)Based on a D'rashah of Rav Chisda, Rebbi Akiva learns from ...

1. ... the words "asher lo" (in the Pasuk in Acharei-Mos) "Vehikriv Aharon es Par ha'Chatas asher lo" - that a Chatas must come from Chulin, and not Kodesh (the D'rashah that we are searching for).

2. ... the Pasuk "Ki ba'Yom ha'Zeh Yechaper aleichem"(Ibid. in connection with the Chatas of Yom Kipur) - that the Avodah of a Chatas must be performed specifically by day.

(c)In answer to the Kashya in connection with ...

1. ... the previous D'rashah, that we already know this from the Pasuk in Tza "be'Yom Tzavoso" (which pertains to Chatas and all the Korbanos) - we answer that this is indeed so. In fact, the Tana only cites the D'rashah of "ba'Yom" by the way (and not to teach us what we do not know already, and the same answer will serve to explain ...

2. ... the third D'rashah from 'Kehunah' (written in connection with Chatas) - which we already know from a statement of Rabah bar bar Chanah ...

(d)... who citing Resh Lakish, states - that whenever the Torah inserts the word "Etzba" or "Kehunah" by any Korban, the pertinent Avodos to that Korban must be performed with the right hand.

5)

(a)Shmuel learns from "Asham" - that the bones (which do not contain marrow) of KOrbanos are permitted (e.g. for the Kohanim to make handles for knives).

(b)Rebbi Eliezer in our Mishnah learned that Todah must come from Chulin from "Vezavachta Pesach ... Tzon u'Bakar". Rebbi Akiva learns like Rav Nachman Amar Rabah bar Avuhah, who learns from the fact that the Torah mentions "Tzon u'Bakar" regarding the Korban Pesach - that Mosar Pesach is brought as Shelamim.

(c)The Torah cannot be speaking exclusively about the Korban Pesach - because the Pesach is not brought from cattle.

(d)We query this from Avuhah di'Shmuel, who learns from the Pasuk in Vayikra "ve'Im min ha'Tzon Korbano le'Zevach ha'Shelamim" - that the Mosar ha'Pesach ('Davar ha'Ba min ha'Tzon) must be brought as Shelamim (the same Halachah as Rav Nachman Amar Rabah bar Avuhah).

6)

(a)The Beraisa learns from the Pasuk there "Keves", 'Lerabos es ha'Pesach le'Alyah' - which means that the Alyah (the fat-tail) of the Pesach (like that of the Shelamim) is burned with the Emurim, and not roasted together with the body of the Pesach.

(b)And from "Im Keves", the Tana learns that Pesach she'Avrah Sh'naso and Shelamim ha'Ba'im Machmas Pesach - i.e. Mosar ha'Pesach (the Chagigah that is brought on the fourteenth of Nisan), must be treated like a Shelamim ...

(c)... in that they require Semichah, T'nufah and Nesachim (which the Pesach does not).

(d)The problem now is - why we need a third Pasuk (as well as the that of Avuhah di'Shmuel) to teach us that Mosar ha'Pesach becomes a Shelamim.

7)

(a)We answer that in fact, all three P'sukim are required. One of them teaches us 'Avrah Z'mano' and 'Avrah Sh'naso' - after the fourteenth of Nisan has passed and after the animal has turned one, respectively.

(b)From the other two P'sukim we learn - that even a. 'Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Avrah Sh'naso' and b. 'Lo Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Sh'naso' will adopt the Din of a Sh'lamim.

(c)The case of 'Lo Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Sh'naso' is - where the Pesach got lost before midday and was found after the owner had designated another one.

(d)We would not be able to learn ...

1. ... 'Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Avrah Sh'naso' from 'Avrah Z'mano ve'Avrah Sh'naso' - because unlike the latter, it is still fit to be brought on Pesach Sheini.

2. ... 'Lo Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Avrah Sh'naso' from 'Avrah Z'mano ve'Lo Avrah Sh'naso' - because, unlike the latter, it is even fit to be brought on Pesach Rishon.

8)

(a)Our Mishnah permits all Korbanos to be brought from Chutz la'Aretz - except for the Omer and the Sh'tei ha'Lechem ...

(b)... which can also not be brought - from Yashan produce.

(c)All Menachos however, like the Omer and the Sh'tei ha'Lechem - must be brought from the best quality crops.

(d)The significance of ...

1. ... Machnis and Zatcha is - that they are the two towns which produce the best quality flour. 'Alfa le'So'les' means - that their flour comes first like 'Alfa' is the first letter in the Greek alphabet (or that these towns are first on the list ...).

2. ... Ofrayim in the valley (to preclude Ofrayim in the mountain) is - that it is the second choice (after Machnis and Zatcha).

9)

(a)The Beraisa disagrees with our Mishnah. He learns from the Pasuk ...

1. ... in Vayikra "Takriv es Minchas Bikurecha" - that if the Omer is brought from Yashan, it is Kasher.

2. ... in Emor "Tavi'u" - that so are the Sh'tei ha'Lechem.

3. ... (ibid.) "mi'Moshvoseichem" - that the Sh'tei ha'Lechem must be brought from the crops of Eretz Yisrael.

(b)The term 'min ha'Aliyah' refers to 'Yashan' - because literally, it means from the attic (implying from last year's stocks).

(c)When (in the previous Perek) we learned from "Tavi'u" ('Im Eino Inyan') that each loaf of the Lachmei Todah must comprise an Isaron - that was from "Tavi", allowing us to learn from the extra 'Vav' that the Sh'tei ha'Lechem is Kasher if it is brought from Yashan.

(d)According to the Tana of the Beraisa (who permits the Omer and the Sh'tei ha'Lechem from Yashan) ...

1. ... "Reishis" - means that Lechatchilah, the Omer ought to comprise Chadash.

2. ... "Minchah Chadashah" means - that the Sh'tei ha'Lechem (which itself may well comprise Yashan) must precede any Minchah comprising Chadash, as Rebbi Nasan and Rebbi Ya'akov learned in another Beraisa.