(Mishnah): The Kesuvah of a Besulah is 200 Zuz. That of a widow is 100. If a Besulah was widowed, divorced or did Chalitzah from Eirusin, her Kesuvah is 200, and she has Ta'anas Besulim (i.e. if she has no Dam Besulim, she loses her Kesuvah).

If a girl converted, was redeemed from captivity, or (was a Kena'ani slave and) was freed, if she converted, was redeemed or freed below the age of three years and a day, her Kesuvah is 200, and she has Ta'anas Besulim.

(Gemara - Rav Huna citing Shmuel): [A Besulah's Kesuvah] is in Shekel ha'Kodesh (a Shekel Kodesh is a Sela of pure silver; 50 Sela'im are 200 Zuz).

(R. Ba bar Bina): [The 200 Zuz] are in a coin that is accepted (Kesef Medinah; it is worth an eighth as much, for it is one eighth silver, and seven eighths copper - PNEI MOSHE).

Support (for R. Ba bar Bina - Mishnah): And the five Sela'im of [Pidyon] ha'Ben are in Maneh Tzuri (pure silver). The 30 [that one pays when his Mu'ad ox gores a] slave, the 50 of Ones u'Mefateh (one who rapes or entices a Na'arah Besulah) and the 100 of Motzi Shem Ra, all are in Shekel ha'Kodesh, in Maneh Tzuri.

Inference: He did not teach Kesuvas Ishah with them (for it is not in Shekel ha'Kodesh)!

Rebuttal (R. Avin): Kesuvas Ishah was learned only from Ones u'Mefateh (the Torah said that a Mefateh pays k'Mohar (Kesuvah of) ha'Besulos, and a Gezeirah Shavah to Ones teaches that this is 50 Shekalim). Since the Mishnah taught Ones u'Mefateh, it is as if it taught Kesuvas Ishah with them.

Question: This refers to a Besulah. What is the law of a widow (is her Kesuvah in Shekel ha'Kodesh, or in a coin that is accepted)?

Answer (R. Chinena): It suffices to get half the Kesuvah of a Besulah (we should not reduce more than this. Like they argue about a Besulah, so they argue about a widow)

(R. Chiyah bar Ada): Even if the Mishnah taught Kesuvas Ishah with [the other matters], the Halachah would not follow it, for all the [coming] Rabanan argue with it!

R. Chananyah and R. Yonason both say that Kesuvah is in a coin that is accepted. R. Yehoshua ben Levi says, a coin that is accepted. R. Yakov bar Acha citing R. Imi, and Reish Lakish citing R. Yudan Nesiya say, a coin that is accepted.

(R. Yochanan): The Sela'im are Sevirinos, from the Yerushalayim gardens.

Question: These say so, and these say so (all these Chachamim say a coin that is accepted. Does Rav Huna argue with all of them?)

Answer: Rather, even he (Rav Huna) retracted and held like them (like the coming episode shows);

A case came in front of Rav Huna of a woman whose Kesuvah was less than 200 Zuz (of Shekel ha'Kodesh). He said, she receives what he wrote to her.

He said to R. Mana 'sit and sign [that she take what he wrote to her].'

R. Mana (to Rav Huna): Conform to your opinion, and I will sign! Did not [you,] Rav Huna, cite Shmuel to say that it is in Shekel ha'Kodesh? (Rather, this shows that Rav Huna retracted.)

Rebuttal (R. Avodama of Tzipori, citing R. Chunah): [He did not retract. He ruled that she collects less] due to the stipulation (her husband wrote less to her, and she accepted it).

Rejection (of Rebuttal): If so, if a woman's Kesuvah was less than 200, she will hide her Kesuvah, in order that she will receive in Shekel ha'Kodesh! (Rather, surely he retracted.)

(In the name of R. Chunah): [Our Mishnah says that a Besulah's Kesuvah is 200, and a widow's is 100] in a place where they do not write a Kesuvah, but in a place where they write a Kesuvah, what (the Kesuvah document that) she takes out (shows to Beis Din), she collects. (We explained this Sugya like RAMBAN.)

Question: (A Beraisa teaches that a Chereshes has a Kesuvah, but no Ta'anas Besulim.) Does a Chereshes have a Kinyan and a Kesuvah?!

Note: SEFER NIR asks that Ta'anas Besulim does not apply a Bogeres. If so, her father married her off. If so, it is a Torah marriage. Surely she has a Kesuvah! Perhaps it is not all one case. A Chereshes has a Kesuvah, i.e. even when she married herself off, and she never has Ta'anas Besulim. (PF)

Answer #1 (R. Yirmeyah citing R. Lazar): The case is, she was a Pikachas, and she became deaf.

Objection: Was she not a Pikachas when he married her?! (Obviously, she has a Kesuvah!)

Answer #2 (R. Yakov bar Acha citing R. Lazar): The case is, she was a Chereshes (when he married her), became a Pikachas and became deaf again. Do not say that since she was initially deaf, she has no Kesuvah. Therefore, it needs to say that she has.

Answer #3: R. Yosi did not say so. Rather, if one had Bi'ah with a Chereshes, does she not receive a fine (of Ones u'Mefateh)?! Since she has a fine, she has a Kesuvah.

Objection (R. Yudan): Does it depend on a fine?! A Bogeres has no fine, yet her Kesuvah is 200! A Besulah from Nisu'in has a fine (e.g. if witnesses testify that she did not have Bi'ah - PNEI MOSHE), yet her Kesuvah is 100!

Support (R. Yochanan - Beraisa): A Cheresh (deafmute) who married a Pikachas (healthy woman), she has no claim against him for food or Kesuvah. If she died, he inherits her. She wanted to put her property in his possession, and he did not want to put his property in her possession;

If a Pike'ach married a Chereshes, she has against him [rights to receive] food and a Kesuvah. If she died, he does not inherit her. He wanted to put his property in her possession, and she did not want to put her property in his possession. (We explained this like SEFER NIR.)

A Pikachas, even if [her husband] the Cheresh became a Pike'ach, or [he was a] lunatic and he became sane, she has no Kesuvah (if he divorces her once he gets Da'as). If he wanted to keep her, her Kesuvah is 100.

(R. Lazar citing R. Chaninah): This is if he had Bi'ah with her after he became a Pike'ach, or became sane, but if he did not have Bi'ah with her after he became a Pike'ach, she does not have a Kesuvah even of 100.