(Mishnah): Any Get that was not written l'Shem (for the sake of) a [particular] woman is Pasul.

What is the case? If a man overheard Sofrim dictating [the words of a Get as they wrote it] 'Ploni divorces his wife Plonis from the place Ploni', and he said 'this is my name and my wife's name', it is Pasul [for him] to divorce with it.

Even further, if one wrote a Get for his wife, then decided not to divorce her, and found another man in his city with the same name, and their wives had the same names, it is Pasul [for the latter man] to divorce with it.

Even further, if one had two wives with the same name, and wrote a Get for the older wife, he cannot use it to divorce the younger wife.

Even further, if one told a scribe 'write [a Get] for whichever [wife] I will want [to divorce], it is Pasul to divorce [either one] with it.

(Gemara): What is dictating? It is [scribes] teaching youths (Talmidim practicing writing Gitin).

Question: Why does it say 'even further'? (Also the second case was not written Lishmah!)

Answer: There (in the Reisha) it was not written l'Shem a Get. Here, it was written l'Shem a Get.

Question: Why does it say [in the third clause] 'even further'? (Also the third case was not written Lishmah!)

Answer: There (the second case) it was not written Lishmo (l'Shem the husband) and not Lishmah (l'Shem the wife). Here, it was written Lishmo, but not Lishmah.

Question: Why does it say [in the fourth clause] 'even further'?

Answer: There (the third case) it was written Lishmo but not Lishmah. Here, it was written Lishmo and Lishmah, but it was not Krus (clearly) Lishmah from the beginning.

(Rav): All of them (the Gitin in our Mishnah) are not Pesulim (i.e. do not disqualify to Kehunah) except for the last (it disqualifies.)

(Isi): All of them are Pesulim, except for the first, which does not disqualify.

(Rabah bar Chinena): All of them are Pesulim.

Reish Lakish's teaching says that all of them are not Pesulim;

(Reish Lakish): If he wrote the Toref in the Tofes, it is Pasul [for Stam, a Get is not Lishmah. Therefore, we do not say that perhaps due to Bereirah it is considered Lishmah; it is totally Pasul.]

R. Yochanan's teaching says that all of them are Pesulim;

(R. Yochanan): If he wrote the Toref in the Tofes, it is Kosher [for Stam, a Get is Lishmah. Therefore, perhaps due to Bereirah it is considered totally Lishmah; therefore, it disqualifies to Kehunah.]

R. Elazar's teaching says that all of them are not Pesulim;

Question (R. Elazar): If a Kidushin document was written Lo Lishmah, does Kidushin take effect on her?

Since he did not ask about Gitin (in our Mishnah, whether they disqualify, therefore he asked about Kidushin. If you would say that he had a question about Gitin, he would not ask about Kidushin!

In Gitin, it must be Lishmah [for a Stam woman is not destined to be divorced], and if he wrote Lo Lishmah, divorce affects her (forbids her to Kehunah) - Kidushin, which does not need Lishmah [for a Stam woman is destined to marry], and he wrote Lo Lishmah, all the more so Kidushin takes effect on her!

Question: Kidushin should be obvious to him (since a Stam woman is destined to marry, surely even Lo Lishmah, Kidushin takes effect on her)!

Answer: It is not obvious to him, because we learn a Kidushin document only from divorce. [Perhaps] just like in divorce, [Lo Lishmah] she is not divorced [at all], also in Kidushin, she is not Mekudeshes [at all. We explained this Sugya like NO'AM YERUSHALMI.]