1. as i remember in the end of chapter 1 and the begining in chapter 2 we
didn't reject r"g opinion that the cases include "bari veshema" (we just
added migo or chazakah)/
2. since that - why didn't the sugia about the place and the time reffering
this issue at all?
Rashi throughout the Sugya explains that all the possibilities offered to explain the Mishna revolve around either R' Yehoshua or Raban Gamliel, since this is indeed a case of Bari v'Shema. The father (i.e. the wife's side) know exactly when the Mum appeared on her, while the husband cannot know when the Mum appeared.