BSD isru hag shavuos
The Acharonim suggest that there might be a printing mistake in the Beraisa. Why does the Beraisa leave out the Halachah that an Eved Ivri goes free with Gira'on Kesef (ATZMOS YOSEF)? In the Sifri, the Beraisa indeed omits the death of the master and includes Gira'on Kesef. This answers our question as well. (RASHASH, BEIS MEIR)
Would you elaborate on how this girsah answers the question?
thanks
Our question was, why does the Beraisa state that an Amah Ivriyah is not freed with the death of the master after Yi'ud? The death of the master should certainly set her free, since the master is her husband, and a wife is released at the death of her husband!
The answer based on positing a printing mistake in the Beraisa goes as follows. As recorded in the Sifri, the Beraisa does not mention the death of the master. Instead, it mentions that an Eved Ivri goes free with Gira'on Kesef whilea Meyu'edes does not. If this is the correct Girsa in the Beraisa, the Beraisa does not mention that an Eved Ivri goes free with the death of the master while a Meyu'edes does not, since both indeed go free with the death of the master (as we pointed out in the question). (See RASHASH and BEIS MEIR)