Perhaps the kollel can remind me where, and it may be in the sugya where the warning must match the eisur (such as Shabbos 102), a mefaresh resolves fitting the required criteria of making a valid Hasra'ah by utilizing a one-word Hasra'ah. If so, why couldn't Tosfos venesru bahu T-K-D simply answer that a one word Hasra'ah was used and need not come onto the caveat that TKD extends beyond greeting-time length if still on topic?
DANIEL GRAY, Toronto Canada
Hi Daniel,
I am not sure what Mefaresh you are referring to. I'd be happy if you can explain.
There are two main Shitos regarding Hasra'ah. The Rambams shitah is that it is enough to tell the sinner that what he is doing, is an Aveira, but it is not required to say what Aveira and what the punishment. Some Rishonim (see Shita Mekubetzes Ksuvos 3a) agree to the basic line of the Rambam, but add that it is required to say what the punishment is for such a sin.
Rashi (Shvuos 20b) and Tosfos (Moed Katan 2b) say that it is required to say exactly what Issur the sinner is executing, with the exact name of the Lav.
Either way, I don?t see how a Hasra'ah can fit into one word.
Best Regards,
Aharon Steiner