More Discussions for this daf
1. Good eyesight and saving the witnesses 2. Ein Onshin Min ha'Din 3. R. Yehuda Ben Tabbai and R. Shimon Ben Shetach
4. Witnesses Plotting 5. Who Do the Eidim Zomemim Pay 6. Makos 005: Hargu Ein Neheragin
7. Tana Beribi 8. Who Do the Eidim Zomemim Pay 9. Ka'asher Zamam by Malkos
10. Who Do the Eidim Zomemim Pay 11. v'Hitzilu ha'Eidah 12. Meshalshin b'Makos
13. After Gmar Din but before He is Put to Death 14. Shem Eidim Zomemim 15. Part of a Group Found To Be Eidim Zomemim
16. Edim Zomemim in Dinei Mamonos 17. Miracles and Halachah 18. Punishing Edim Zomemim
19. The Gemara answers by saying it's a good question 20. Edim Zomemim dividing their punishment 21. Edim Zomemim
22. Rashi and Tosfos 23. Judges 24. משלשין בממון
 DAF DISCUSSIONS - MAKOS 5
1. Nissim Bitton asked:

The gemara teaches that we can't apply a kal vachomer to malkut and to issourim when there is a passouk that indeed teaches just that (ref: a daughter of a father or a dahghter of a mother). In this week's parasha ki tavo 27.22 it seems that one can curse one's sister of both father and mother, since we can't apply a kal vachomer. Or we can say that since ther is no specific passouk for a sister of both a father and a mother ( in passok 27.22) we could apply the kal vachomer and say that if one cannot have relations with a sister of a father or of a mother then certainly one cannot have relations with a full sister. What do you say?

Nissim Bitton, Montreal, Canada

2. The Kollel replies:

Being that there is already a Pasuk for being with a sister, whether half-sister or full sister as discussed at length by our Gemara, I do not see any need for a special Pasuk mentioning specifically a full sister.

All the best,

Yaakov Montrose