What are the connotations of "Va'ya'aseiah ka'Mishpat"?
Rashi: He brought the Olah in accordance with the Din of an Olas Nedavah ? which equires Semichah - as prescribed at the beginning of Vayikra. 1
Seforno: He brought the people's Olah like the Halachah requires ? inasmuch as the B'nei Aharon sprinkled the blood, arranged the pieces on the Mizbe'ach and burned them. 2
See Sifsei Chachamim. Moshav Zekenim: And even though a Mishnah teaches the only Korbanos Tzibur that require Semichah are Par Yom Kipur and Par Helam Davar, since they only brought it in honor of Aharon, it is smilar to the Korban Yachid of a Nazir, which requires Semichah.
As opposed to the Se'ir ha'Chatas of the people, which Aharon himself sacrificed (Oznayim la'Torah).
This is difficult however, since the Pasuk stated that Aharon burned them X.See Pesukim 13 & 18).
See Peirush Yonasan.
Rashi (1:4, citing the Sifra) writes that "Al Rosh ha'Olah" teaches about Semichah for Olas Tzon and Olas Chovah. But we can learn from both of these from here - "ka'Mishpat" - also Olas Chovah requires Semichah (Beitzah 20a), and this applies also to the lamb (Tzon)?
Refer to 1:4:154:1.
QUESTIONS ON RASHI
Rashi writes that "ka'Mishpat" means like the Din of Olas Nedavah - it requires Semichah (Beitzah 20a). Bu a Mishnah teaches that the only Korbanos Tzibur that require Semichah are Par Yom Kipur and Par Helam Davar?
Moshav Zekenim: Even though Yisrael brought it, they brought it only for Aharon. It is therefore like the Korban Yachid of a Nazir, which requires Semichah.
Rashi writes that "ka'Mishpat", is like the Din of Olas Nedavah. Why does he not say that it is like the Olah mentioned earlier in theParshah?
Riva: Because, whereas Olas Nedavah applies in all generations, the Olah mentioned earlier applied only at that time.
