What are the implications of the word "Eis Michsas ha'Erkcha"?
Erchin, 34b: It implies that, as opposed to a Sadeh Achuzah, where the owner redeems according to the specifications in Pasuk 16, the purchaser redeems the field according to the market price. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 135.
?Vechishav ha?Kohen eis Michsas ha?Erk?cha?. What is the significance of the comparison of the Sadeh Mikneh to Arachim?
Erchin, 14b: It teaches us that, like Erchin, the purchaser who redeems the field from Hekdesh, is not required to pay an extra fifth.
What are the implications of the latter half of the Pasuk "Venasan es ha'Erkcha ... Kodesh la'Hashem"?
Chulin, 139b: It implies that Arachim only become Hekdesh once they reach the hand of the Gizbar, in which case the owner is liable to replace them should they get lost.
What are the implications of the words "ba'Yom ha'Hu"?
Erchin, 24a: It implies that 'Hekdesh goes after the current time and location', and that consequently, if a pearl that one is Makdish is not well-priced in the town and at the time the owner declares it Hekdesh, the Gizbor neither goes to another town, nor wait for market-day - to get a better price. 1
See Torah Temimah, note 138.
Why does the Torah add the words "Kodesh la'Hashem"?
