How will we reconcile "Al Lechem" - implying that the lambs are on top of the loaves, with "Al Sh'nei Kevasim", which implies the reverse?
1.
Menachos, 62a: The apparent contradiction teaches us that in fact, they are placed side by side whilst waving.
1
2.
Rashi (in Sukah, 37b): Refer to 23:19:1:2.
2
And "Lechem ha'Bikurim ... al Sh'nei Kevasim" means that he actually places the loaves on the two (live) lambs.
See Torah Temmah citing Zevachim, 55a, which learns this from a different source.
3)
Why does the Toah insert the (otherwise superfluous) word "Yih'yu"?
1.
Menachos, 27a: To teach us that the two lambs are crucial - and that one cannot bring just one.
1
2.
Menachos,45b: n conjunction with the word "la'Kohen, it teaches us that the loaves, which are eaten entirely by the Kohen, are crucial to the lambs - but not vice-versa.
2
"Kodesh Yih'yu la'Hashem la'Kohen". Why does the Torah insert the Torah insert the (otherwise superfluous) word "la'Kohen"?
1;.MenachoS 45b: Since it is Lechem that are given entirely to the Kohen, it teaches us that the loaves are crucial to the lambs, but the lambs are not crucial to the loaves.
