Arachin, 3a: It precludes a Katan from Kareis. ¹

Yerushalmi Nazir, 7:4: It implies that only someone who is subject to Chituy (being sprinkled) is Chayav Kareis for entering the Mikdash - but not someone who is not. ¹

Rashi (citing Shevu'os, 16b): Because, on the one hand, the Mishkan was anointed with the Shemen ha'Mishchah, whilst the Mikdash was not, whilst on the other hand, the Kedushah of the Mikdash was permanent, whereas that of the Mishkan was not. ¹ Consequently, we would not have knmown one from the other.

Shevu?os, 16b: One, to teach us the Din of a Tamei who enters the Mikdash be?Tum?ah, the other ? In Eino Inyan ? the Din of someone enters the Azarah be Taharah, and there is a Meis in the Azarah. ²

Horayos, 9b: To preclude from Kareis for entering the Mikdash be?Tum?ah, a Kohen Gadol, whose Chatas is different than that of the Par He?elam Davar shel Tzibur. ¹