Why does it say "Kol Yisrael"?
Refer to Melachim I, 16:11:1:1.
What is the meaning of "Mah Lanu Chelek b'David"?
Refer to Melachim I, 12:16:2:1-3.
Why did they add "v'Lo Nachalah b'Ven Yishai"?
Refer to Melachim I, 12:16:3:1.
Why did they say "l'Ohalecha Yisrael"?
'Rashi': This refers to "Mah Lanu Chelek b'David"; why should we abandon our tents and follow him? Rather, let us return to our tents!
Refer to Melachim I, 12:16:4:1,2.
Why did they say "Re'eh Beischa David"?
'Rashi', Rashi (Melachim I, 12:16): We need not go to your Beis ha'Mikdash; it is only for you. 1 Panim Yafos (Devarim 12:5) ? Dushnah Shel (a place outside) Yericho was designated in lieu of the place where the Mikdash will be built [the owner of that place will receive Dushnah Shel Yericho]. Yericho was in Galil, in the Malchus of Yaravam. Since he fought with Rechav'am, surely he did not give to him Dushnah Shel Yericho. If so, the place of the Mikdash is only of Yehudah 2 .
See your house, David ? we do not desire you, nor your Beis ha'Mikdash.
Refer to Melachim I, 12:16:5:2-4.
Refer to Melachim I, 12:16:4:1. (A comment in 'Rashi' rejects this. It seems that 'Rashi' cites this from others. - PF)
Panim Yafos: This explains also why in Yehoshua (22:24-25), there was concern only lest Yisrael say to Bnei Gad and Bnei Reuven "you have no share in Hashem", but not to Chetzi Menasheh, for Menasheh had a share in Dushnah Shel Yericho, [so they will have a share in the Beis ha'Mikdash when it is built. Gad and Reuven forfeited their share in everything west of the Yarden, including Dushnah Shel Yericho, so they will not have a share in the Mikdash. This is astounding, that already Yisrael know that Yaravam will fight with Rechav'am and not give Dushnah Shel Yericho. If this was important to them, they could have stipulated to accept a king only if he will let Yehudah keep Dushnah Shel Yericho, so Yisrael will retain a share of the Mikdash! - PF]
