(Permission is granted to redistribute this material as long as the Kollel
header and the subscription info at the end are included.)

_________________________________________________________________
CHARTS FOR LEARNING THE DAILY DAF

brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Email - daf@shemayisrael.co.il
_________________________________________________________________

Temurah Chart #2

Temurah Daf 27b

THE ARGUMENT BETWEEN REBBI YOCHANAN AND REISH LAKISH
  (A)
REBBI YOCHANAN 		(B)
REISH LAKISH
1) REBBI YONAH(1) There is Bitul Mekach There is no Bitul Mekach
2a) REBBI YIRMIYAH (ACCORDING TO RASHI)(2) The person presumably intended to mis-assess the item; hence the sale is valid The person did not intend to mis-assess the item; hence the sale is invalid
2b) REBBI YIRMIYAH (ACCORDING TO TOSFOS)(3) Unintentional mis-assessment does *not* cause Bitul Mekach Unintentional mis-assessment *does* cause Bitul Mekach
3) IY BA'IS EIMA(4) There is no Ona'ah for Hekdesh There is Ona'ah for Hekdesh
==========
FOOTNOTES:
==========
 (1) According to Rebbi Yonah, the argument is whether or not the law of Bitul Mekach applies to Hekdesh.
(2) According to Rebbi Yirmeyah (according to Rashi), everyone agrees that there the law of Bitul Mekach does not apply to Hekdesh. Rather, the argument is whether we assume that the person intentionally mis-assessed the value of the item.
(3) According to Rebbi Yirmeyah (according to Tosfos), the argument is whether or not an unintentional mis-assessment of value causes Bitul Mekach.
(4) According to this version, the argument is whether or not Ona'ah invalidates the sale of Hekdesh.

Main
Temurah Page		 List of Charts
and Graphics		 Insights
to the Daf
 Background
to the Daf		 Review the Daf
Questions and Answers 		Point by Point
Summary

For questions or sponsorship information, write to daf@shemayisrael.co.il