Mishnah 1
1)
(a)What do a V'lad Chatas, a Temuras Chatas and a Chatas she'Meisah Ba'alehah have in common?
(b)From where do we know that a Chatas that has entered its second year is Pasul?
(c)What does the Mishnah mean when its says she'Avrah Shenasah ve'she'Avdah ve'Nimtzeis Ba'alas-Mum?
(d)On what condition does the Tana Pasken in both cases 'Tamus'?
1)
(a)The common factor that is shared by a V'lad Chatas, a Temuras Chatas and a Chatas she'Meisah Ba'alehah - is Tamus (they must all die).
(b)We know that a Chatas that has entered its second year is Pasul - because the Torah writes in connection with it "bas Shenasah".
(c)When the Mishnah says ' ... she'Avrah Shenasah ve'she'Avdah ve'Nimtzeis Ba'alas-Mum', it means that - either it got lost after it entered its second year, or it got lost and then obtained a blemish (See Tosfos Yom Tov & Chidushei ha'G'ra).
(d)The Tana Paskens in both cases 'Tamus' - provided the owner then brought another Chatas in its place (See Tiferes Yisrael).
2)
(a)What does the Tana say, in the previous case, about ...
1. ... declaring a Temurah on it?
2. ... having Hana'ah from it and Me'ilah?
(b)Why is it not subject to Me'ilah?
(c)What will be the Din if the Chatas is found before the owner has brought a replacement?
(d)This ruling pertains to a Chatas she'Avrah Shenasah. What will be the Din in the case of the Ba'alas-Mum?
2)
(a)The Tana says, in the previous case, that one cannot ...
1. ... declare a Temurah on it and that ...
2. ... although it is not subject to Me'ilah, one may not benefit from it.
(b)It is not subject to Me'ilah - because, since neither it nor its redemption money are brought on the Mizbe'ach, its Kedushah has dissolved.
(c)If, on the other hand, the Chatas is found before the owner has brought another Chatas - the Din is 'Yir'eh ... '.
(d)This ruling pertains to a Chatas she'Avrah Shenasah. In the case of the Ba'alas-Mum - it is sold immediately and a substitute purchased with the proceeds.
3)
(a)In the latter two cases, what will be the Din regarding ...
1. ... declaring a Temurah on it?
2. ... Me'ilah in the event that one benefits from it?
(b)On what grounds can it make a Temurah? What is the criterion for making a Temurah?
3)
(a)In the latter two cases, one can ...
1. ... declare a Temurah on it and ...
2. ... it is subject to Me'ilah in the event that one benefits from it.
(b)The reason that it can make a Temurah is - because any animal that can either be brought as a Korban or that can be sold and a Korban brought with its proceeds can make a Temurah.
Mishnah 2
4)
(a)What does the Mishnah say about ...
1. ... a Chatas that is lost and that is found only after the owner has already brought another Chatas in its place?
2. ... the money that one designated for a Chatas is lost and that is found only after the owner has already brought another Chatas in its place?
(b)On what principle is this latter ruling based?
4)
(a)The Mishnah rules that ...
1. ... a Chatas that is lost and that is found only after the owner has already brought another Chatas in its place - must die.
2. ... the money that one designated for a Chatas is lost and that is found only after the owner has already brought another Chatas in its place - goes to the Yam-ha'Melach ...
(b)... based on the principle that - wherever the Chatas dies, in the equivalent case, the money goes to the Yam-ha'Melach.
Mishnah 3
5)
(a)What must one do in a case where one's lost designated money is found after the owner has designated fresh money, but before he has actually managed to purchase a Chatas with it?
(b)What happens ...
1. ... to the rest of the money?
2. ... to the rest of the money if he purchases a Chatas with one set of money?
(c)And what must the owner do if, after designating a Chatas ...
1. ... to replace the money that he designated and that got lost, the Chatas is found to be a Ba'alas-Mum?
2. ... it gets lost and before he has a chance to purchase a replacement with the money that he designates he finds the lost Chatas, which is then found to be a Ba'alas-Mum?
(d)What happens to the money if, in the pre-last case, the Chatas is not a Ba'alas-Mum?
(e)Who is the author of the opinion that if the lost animal or money is found before the replacement has been brought, it must die?
5)
(a)In a case where one's lost designated money is found after the owner has designated fresh money, but before he has actually managed to purchase a Chatas with it, one - purchases a Chatas with a combination of money from each one.
(b)The rest of the money ...
1. ... in this case - goes to Nedavah.
2. ... if he purchases a Chatas with one set of money - the other set goes to the Yam ha'Melach (like a Chatas whose owner has received his atonement through another Chatas).
(c)If, after designating a Chatas ...
1. ... to replace the money that he designated and that got lost, the Chatas is found to be a Ba'alas-Mum - it should be sold and the same applies to it as in the first case in the Mishnah.
2. ... it gets lost and, before he has a chance to purchase a replacement with the money that he designates, he finds the lost Chatas, which is then found to be a Ba'alas-Mum - it must be sold, and the same Din applies to it and to the remainder of the money.
(d)If, in the pre-last case, the Chatas is not a Ba'alas-Mum - the remaining money goes to the Yam ha'Melach.
(e)The author of the opinion that if the lost animal or money is found before the replacement has been brought, it must die - is Rebbi (who holds that if the lost Chatas is found before the owner has been atoned for, it must die (and if it is money, it must go to the Yam ha'Melach, as we are about to learn [See Tosfos Yom Tov]).
6)
(a)The Mishnah now discusses a case where the owner designates a Chatas to replace the Chatas that got lost. What happens if both animals turn out to be blemished?
(b)If both animals are Temimos, then according to Rebbi, the owner brings one of them and the other one must die. What do the Chachamim say about ...
1. ... a Chatas that is lost and found before its replacement has been brought?
2.... the money for a Chatas that is lost and found before its replacement has been brought?
6)
(a)The Mishnah now discusses a case where the owner designates a Chatas to replace the Chatas that got lost. If both animals turn out to be blemished - then they too, must be sold, money from both animals is used to purchase another Chatas, and the remaining money goes to Nedavah.
(b)If both animals are Temimos, then according to Rebbi, the owner brings one of them and the other one must die. The Chachamim say that ...
1. ... a Chatas that is lost - does not die unless it is found after its replacement has already been brought.
2. ... the money for a Chatas that is lost and found - does not go to Yam ha'Melach unless it is found after its replacement has already been brought.
7)
(a)What if, in the latter case, the owner brings the one that was not lost?
(b)In that case, Rebbi and the Chachamim are arguing over where the owner brought the one that was lost and found. What is then the basis of their Machlokes?
7)
(a)If, in the latter case, the owner brings the one that was not lost - the Chachamim agree that the lost animal must die, even if it was found before the replacement was brought.
(b)In that case, Rebbi and the Chachamim are arguing over where the owner brought the one that was lost and found, and the basis of their Machlokes is - whether, when an animal that the owner designates to replace a lost Chatas has the Din of the lost Chatas (Rebbi) or not (the Chachamim [See Tosfos Yom Tov]).
Mishnah 4
8)
(a)What must the owner of a Chatas do if he discovers that it is a Ba'alas-Mum?
(b)What does Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon say about the sold animal if it has not yet been Shechted when its replacement is brought?
(c)On what grounds does the Tana Kama disagree with him?
(d)Like whom is the Halachah?
8)
(a)If the owner of a Chatas discovers that it is a Ba'alas-Mum - he must sell it, and with the proceeds, purchase a replacement.
(b)According to Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon if the sold animal has not yet been Shechted when its replacement is brought - it must die.
(c)The Tana Kama disagrees with him - in that, once the animal has been sold, they consider it as if it was no longer in the world (and it is only if it is still in the jurisdiction of the original owner when he atones with the other Chatas that it must die).
(d)The Halachah is - like the Tana Kama.
