1)
(a)The Mishnah now lists things that pertain to Korb'nos Yachid but not to Korb'nos Tzibur, and vice-versa. What is the first item (in connection with Temurah) with regard to the former listed by the Tana?
(b)The second item is that Korb'nos Yachid can be either male or female, whereas Korb'nos Tzibur are always male. Why is that are most Korb'nos Tzibur automatically male?
(c)The Torah specifically requires all Chata'os Tzibur and the one solitary Shalmei Tzibur to be males as well. What is the only case of Shalmei Tzibur?
1)
(a)The Mishnah now lists things that pertain to Korb'nos Yachid but not to Korb'nos Tzibur, and vice-versa. The first item listed by the Tana (with regard to the former) is that - it is subject to Temurah (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(b)The second item is that Korb'nos Yachid can be either male or female, whereas Korb'nos Tzibur are always male. Most Korb'nos Tzibur are automatically male - because they are Olos, and an Olah can only be a male.
(c)The Torah specifically requires all Chata'os Tzibur and the one solitary Shalmei Tzibur - (the Zivchei Shalmei Tzibur that is brought on Shavu'os together with the Sh'tei ha'Lechem) to be males as well.
2)
(a)The third thing that pertains specifically to Korb'nos Yachid is that one is 'Chayav be'Ach'rayusan u've'Acharayus Niskeihem' (See Tosfos Yom Tov). To which kind of Korbanos is the Tana referring?
(b)What does he then mean when he says 'Chayav be'Ach'rayusan ... '?
(c)What is an example of this ruling?
(d)What happens to Korb'nos Tzibur after their time has expired?
2)
(a)The third thing that pertains specifically to Korb'nos Yachid is that one is 'Chayav be'Ach'rayusan u've'Acharayus Niskeihem' (See Tosfos Yom Tov DH 'u've'Acharayus Niskeihem' & 'Einan Chayavin ... ') - with reference to Korbanos that have a fixed time ...
(b)... and when he says 'Chayav be'Ach'rayusan ... ', he means that - if the initial time-period has elapsed, the onus remains on him to bring them.
(c)An example of this ruling is - the Olah of a woman or the Korbanos of a Metzora, after the eighth day of their purification ceremony (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
(d)If, on the other hand, the time of Korb'nos Tzibur has expired (Ibid.) - the Kohanim are exempt from bringing them.
3)
(a)The one exception to the current riling is the Nesachim that are brought together with the Korban. What does the Mishnah say about bringing the Nesachim after the Korban Tzibur has already been brought?
(b)What other leniency (besides the Heter to bring them even ten days after the Korban) do we learn from the fact that the Pasuk in Pinchas repeats "u'Minchasam ve'Niskeihem" by each of the Musaf offerings?
3)
(a)The The one exception to the current riling is the Nesachim that are brought together with the Korban - which the Mishnah obligates to bring even as long as ten days after the Korban Tzibur has already been brought, if it was not possible to bring them earlier.
(b)Besides the Heter to bring them even ten days after the Korban, we learn from the fact that the Pasuk in Pinchas repeats "u'Minchasam ve'Niskeihem" by each of the Musaf offerings that - one may bring them at nighttime.
4)
(a)According to the Tana Kama, which dual advantage do Korb'nos Tzibur have over Korb'nos Yachid?
(b)On what condition is a Korban Tzibur brought be'Tum'ah?
(c)From which Pasuk do we learn it?
4)
(a)According to the Tana Kama, the dual advantage that Korb'nos Tzibur have over Korb'nos Yachid is that - they override both Shabbos and Tum'ah.
(b)A Korban Tzibur is brought be'Tum'ah - if the majority of the Kohanim are Tamei.
(c)We learn this ruling - from the word "be'Mo'ado" (in the Pasuk in Pinchas "Tishm'ru Lehakriv Li be'Mo'ado").
5)
(a)Rebbi Meir queries the Tana Kama from two Korb'nos Yachid that are also brought be'Tum'ah. One of them is the Chavitei Kohen Gadol. What is the other?
(b)How do we learn that the Chavitei Kohen Gadol overrides Tum'ah from the fact that the Torah writes by it "Minchas Tamid"?
(c)What is therefore the criterion for overriding Shabbos and Tum'ah, according to Rebbi Meir?
(d)Like whom is the Halachah?
5)
(a)Rebbi Meir queries the Tana Kama from two Korb'nos Yachid that are also brought be'Tum'ah, the Chavitei Kohen Gadol - and the Par Kohen Gadol on Yom Kipurim.
(b)We learn that the Chavitei Kohen Gadol overrides Tum'ah from the fact that the Torah writes there "Minchas Tamid" - effectively comparing it to the Korban Tamid (in connection with which the Torah write "be'Mo'ado").
(c)The criterion for overriding Shabbos and Tum'ah, according to Rebbi Meir is that - it has a fixed time (even if it is a Korban Yachid).
(d)The Halachah is - like Rebbi Meir (See Tosfos Yom Tov).
6)
(a)The Tana Kama now draws a distinction between a Chatas Yachid whose owner received atonement via another Korban Chatas and a Tzibur. What is the case?
(b)What distinction does it draw between them?
(c)What is the source for 'Chatas she'Meisah Be'alehah, Meisah'?
(d)Then why not Chatas ha'Tzibur?
(e)What does Rebbi Yehudah say?
6)
(a)The Tana Kama now draws a distinction between a Chatas Yachid whose owner received atonement via another Korban Chatas and a Tzibur. The case is - where the original Chatas gets lost and is found only after they have brought a substitute.
(b)He requires the former to die - but not the latter.
(c)The source for 'Chatas she'Meisah Be'alehah, Meisah' is - Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai ...
(d)... which specifically precludes Chata'os Tzibur.
(e)According to Rebbi Yehudah - the Chatas Tzibur must die, too (as will be explained shortly).
7)
(a)Rebbi Shimon (who is the Tana Kama) cites the three other cases that the Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai (besides 'Chatas she'Avrah Shenasah') comprises. Two of them are V'lad Chatas and Temuras Chatas. What is the third?
(b)Why is a Tzibur not subject to ...
1. ... V'lad Chatas the Din of V'lad Chatas Meisah'?
2. ... Temuras Chatas?
3. ... Chatas she'Meisah Be'alehah?
(c)How does Rebbi Shimon now query Rebbi Yehudah?
(d)Like whom is the Halachah?
7)
(a)Rebbi Shimon (who is the Tana Kama) cites the three other cases that the Halachah le'Moshe mi'Sinai (besides 'Chatas she'Avrah Shenasah') comprises, V'lad Chatas, Temuras Chatas - and Chatas she'Meisu Ba'alehah.
(b)A Tzibur is not subject to the Din of ...
1. ... V'lad Chatas she'Meisah' - because, as we just explained, all Korb'nos Tzibur are exclusively males.
2. ... Temuras Chatas she'Meisah - because a Korban Tzibur is not subject to Temurah.
3. ... Chatas she'Meisah Be'alehah - because a Tzibur does not die (See Tosfos Yom Tov [DH 'Aval Lo be'Tzibur']).
(c)Rebbi Shimon now queries Rebbi Yehudah in that - just as the above three cases do not apply to a Chatas Tzibur, so too, will the Din of Chatas she'Kipru Be'alehah and she'Avrah Shenasan not apply either (See Tosfos Yom Tov DH 'Rebbi Shimon Omer'.
(d)The Halachah is - like Rebbi Shimon.
8)
(a)Two of the three Chumros of Kodshim over Temurah listed by the Mishnah are that they make a Temurah and that a Tzibur and Shutfin can declare them. What is the third?
(b)How do we learn the latter ruling from the words "Beheimah bi'Veheimah" (in the Pasuk there "ve'Im Hamer Yamir Beheimah bi'Veheimah")?
(c)How do we learn the first rulinge from the word "Temuraso" (in the Pasuk in Bechukosai "Vehayah hu u'Temuraso Yih'yeh Kodesh")?
8)
(a)The three Chumros of Kodshim over Temurah listed by the Mishnah are that they make a Temurah, that a Tzibur and Shutfin can declare them and that - they take effect on limbs and fetuses.
(b)We learn the latter ruling from the words "Beheimah bi'Veheimah" (in the Pasuk there "ve'Im Hamer Yamir Beheimah bi'Veheimah") - which implies that if one declares a Beheimas Chulin Ba'al-Mum that is inside a Kodshim animal a Temurah, it takes effect (See Tosfos Yom Tov), but not a limb or a fetus.
(c)Whereas the first ruling we learn from the word "Temuraso" (in the Pasuk in Bechukosai "Vehayah hu u'Temuraso Yih'yeh Kodesh") - from which we Darshen "Temuraso", 've'Lo Temuras Temuraso'.
9)
(a)The only Chumrah of Temurah over Kodshim listed by the Tana Kama is that it takes effect over an animal with a permanent blemish. What is the case?
(b)To what extent is the Kedushah effective?
(c)What is the Din if one declares a blemished animal Hekdesh?
9)
(a)The only Chumrah of Temurah over Kodshim listed by the Tana Kama is that it takes effect over an animal with a permanent blemish. Consequently - if one declares a Beheimas Chulin Ba'al-Mum a Temurah, it takes effect.
(b)The Kedushah is effective to the extent that - it cannot go out to Chulin to be shorn or worked with.
(c)If one declares a blemished animal Hekdesh - it goes out to Chulin through Pidyon, even to be shorn and worked with.
10)
(a)Which second Chumra does Rebbi Yossi bar Rebbi Yehudah add based on the words "Yih'yeh Kodesh"?
(b)What is the case?
(c)On which principle is the opposite ruling by Kodshim based?
10)
(a)The second Chumra Rebbi Yossi bar Rebbi Yehudah adds based on the words "Yih'yeh Kodesh" is that - unlike Hekdesh, Temurah takes effect be'Shogeg like be'Meizid.
(b)The case is where he meant to declare the white ox that leaves his house a Temurah and, by mistake, he said a black one.
(c)The opposite ruling by Kodshim is based on the principle - 'Hekdesh Ta'us, Eino Hekdesh'.
11)
(a)Rebbi Elazar rules with regard to an animal that is a Kil'ayim, a T'reifah, a Tumtum or an Androginus 'Lo Kedoshim ve'Lo Makdishin'. What is a Kil'ayim?
(b)What is the case of a Kodshim animal that is a T'reifah? How can a T'reifah be Kadosh?
11)
(a)Rebbi Elazar rules with regard to an animal that is a Kil'ayim - the child of a goat and a sheep, a T'reifah, a Tumtum or an Androginus 'Lo Kedoshim ve'Lo Makdishin'.
(b)'A Kodshim animal that is a T'reifah' - speaks where it became a T'reifah after the owner declared it Hekdesh.
12)
(a)What is the case of a Kodshim animal that is a Kila'yim, a Tumtum or an Androginus?
(b)Based on what principle are the latter three Kadosh?
(c)Why does Rebbi Elazar see fit to mention this ruling here?
(d)Why does the previous ruling concerning an animal that is a Kila'yim, a Tumtum or an Androginus go according to Rebbi Yehudah? What does Rebbi Yehudah say about V'lados Kodshim?
(e)On what grounds does the ruling regarding all these cases differ that of a Ba'al Mum?
12)
(a)The case of a Kodshim animal that is a Kila'yim, a Tumtum or an Androginus is - where it is the child of a Kodshim animal (V'lad Kodshim).
(b)The latter three are Kadosh - on account of the principle 'Ubar Yerech Imo hu'.
(c)Rebbi Elazar sees fit to mention this ruling here - to strike a contrast between them and a Ba'al-Mum Kavu'a, which we just learned is subject to Temurah.
(d)The previous ruling concerning an animal that is a Kila'yim, a Tumtum or an Androginus goes according to Rebbi Yehudah, who rules that - other V'lados Kodshim can make a Temurah.
(e)The ruling regarding all these cases differs from that of a Ba'al Mum - because although there are cases where a Ba'al-Mum can be a Korban, they never can.
13)
(a)Why is the Halachah like Rebbi Yossi b'Rebbi Yehudah and Rebbi Elazar?
13)
(a)The Halachah is like Rebbi Yossi bar Rebbi Yehudah and Rebbi Elazar - because nobody argues with them (See Tosfos Yom Tov here and DH 'Rebbi Yossi bar Rebbi Yehudah ... ').