hebrew
1)

What are the implications of "Ve'haysah lo u'le'Zar'o Acharav ... "?

1.

Yevamos, 100b: It implies that a Kohen must know who his father is. Consequently, if a Kohen separates from a group of ten and has relations with a woman who bears a son and one doesn't know which of the ten men is his father, the son is disqualified from the Din Kehunah. 1

2.

Kidushin, 66b: "Zar'o" incorporates Zera Kasher and Zera Pasul. Consequently, if a Kohen who is serving on the Mizbe'ach discovers that his mother is a Gerushah or a Chalutzah, his Avodah is valid. 2


1

This D'rashah is actually an Asmachta. See Torah Temimah, note 28, citing the Gemara.

2

Bedi'eved. See Torah Temimah, note 29.

2)

What are the ramifications of "B'ris Kehunas Olam"?

1.

Rashi: Now (after he killed Zimri) Pinchas was granted a permanent lease of Kehunah for himself and for his descendants. 1 2

2.

Targum Yonasan: 'Because they denigrated him by calling him the son of Puti the Midyanite, 3 I will attribute his Yichus to the Kohen Gadol - and because he took the spear with his arm, struck the Midyanite woman in her womb and prayed with his mouth on behalf of the people of Yisrael, the Kohanim will receive the three gifts [from a slaughtered Chulin Behemah] - the right foreleg, the jaws and the stomach', and it will be for him and his children after him an everlasting covenant because ehe was zealous on behalf of his G-d and atoned on behalf of B'nei Yisrael'.

3.

Hadar Zekenim: He became the Mashu'ach Milchamah from now on.

4.

Menachos, 20a: It teaches us that there can be no Korbanos without Kohanim. 4

5.

Yerushalmi Sanhedrin, 9:7: Had Hashem not interjeted with "Vehaysah lo ? B'ris Kehunas Olam", the Chachamim would have placed Pinchas in Cherem - because the Halachah of 'Kana'im Pog'in bo' is not with the good-will of the Chachamim. 5


1

Refer to 25:13:2:1 and note.

2

Hadar Zekenim (on Pasuk 14) - one of Elisheva's seven Simchos on the eighth day of the Milu'im was that her grandson (Pinchas) was Mashu'ach Milchamah! Da'as Zekenim (on Pasuk 13, citing R. Shmuel) - perhaps he was Mashu'ach Milchamah, but he was not a Kohen regarding the Avodah and passing on to his children until now.

2. 3

Refer to 25:11:1:1.

4

See Torah Temimah Vayikra, 2:13, citing Menachos, 20a.

5

See Torah Temimah, note 31, who elaborates, and who explains that, in the current case, it came to prove, either that Pinchas was a true Kana'i, or that he was not guilty of issuing a Halachah in front of his Rebbe.

3)

Seeing as Pinchas was the son of Elazar ha'Kohen, why was he not a Kohen before he killed Zimri?

1.

Rashi: Because he was already born when Aharon and his sons were chosen to become Kohanim, and it was only their subsequent offspring who continued the line of Kehunah. 1


1

Da'as Zekenim and Hadar Zekenim (in Pasuk 14): The Milu'im (the inauguration ceremony) was confined to Aharon and his sons (but not his grandsons), and the Bigdei Kehunah were made only for them - as the Torah describes in Tetzaveh and Pikudei. See Torah Temimah, note 30, as to why Pinchas' appointment to the Kehunah was postponed until now.

4)

"Ve'haysah lo u'le'Zar'o Acharav B'ris Kehunas Olam". What are the implications of ?u'le'Zar'o Acharav??

1.

R. Bachye (citing the Ibn Ezra): It implies that Pinchas died and his sons succeded him ? in which case he cannot have been Eliyahu.

2.

R. Bachye (citing Zevachim 101b): Pinchas was Eliyahu. Consequently, ?Zar?o Acharav? refers to his descendents after he rose to the Heaven. 1 2


1

R. Bachye (on Pasuk 12): Like Chanoch, who was the seventh generation after Adam and who roe to the Heaven (to become the Mal?ach Matatron, he too, the seventh generation after Y?akov, rose to the Heaven and became a Malach.

2

R. Bachye (on Pasuk 12): Because he was destined to become a G-dly being, he acquired the twin Midos of Din and Rachamim (inherent in his name ?Alef Lamed? ? Din, and??Yud, Hey, Vav? ? Rachamiim), thus enabling him to punish the captain of fity and his fifty men ? in Melechim 1. 8-12) - with death, on the one hand, and to bring to life the child (ibid. 17:22) on the other.

5)

?Vehaysah lo ? B?ris Kehunas Olam?. Why does the Torah not write ?B?ris Melach? ? like it did in Bamidbar 18:10 - in connection with Aharon and his descendents?

1.

R. Bachye: Because he drew his blessing directly from Midas Chesed ? the Midah of Kehunah 1 - as hinted in his name, which is the acronym of ??P?nei Chesed?, 2 on account of which he did not die, as opposed to Aharon and his descendents 3


1

See R. Chavel?s footnotes.

2

See R. Chavel?s footnotes.

3

See R. Bachye.

6)

What are the connotations of "Tachas asher Kinei le'Elokav"?

1.

Rashi: It means 'because he was zealous on behalf of 1 his G-d'.

2.

Seforno: Since Pinchas quarreled Hashem's quarrel, Hashem saved him from the quarrel of competing forces. 2


1

Rashi: As in Beha'aloscha, 11:29 and in Zecharyah, 9:2.

2

Seforno: Which is the essence of peace. Refer also to 25:12:1:2*.

7)

What is the connection between Pinchas' zealousness on behalf of his G-d and the B'ris Shalom that he received as a reward?

1.

Seforno: Since Pinchas quarreled Hashem's quarrel, Hashem saved him from the quarrel of competing forces. 1

2.

Toldos Yitzchak: Because having killed esteemed people from great families his life could have been in jeapordy. The B'ris Shalom therefore assured him that he was safe.


1

Seforno: Which is the essence of peace. Refer also to 25:12:1:2*.

8)

What is the significance of the statement "Vayechaper al B'nei Yisrael"? What sort of Korban did Pinchas bring?

1.

R. Bachye and Rosh: It teaches us that if someone kills a Rasha, it is as if he offered a Korban. 1 2

2.

Seforno: By killing the sinners in public, whereby the people received atonement by not objecting to his actions . 3

3.

Da'as Zekenim: It teaches us that he became worthy to make other Kaparos (to offer Korbanos) on behalf of Yisrael.

4.

Oznayim la'Torah: He was zealous on behalf of his G-d and he atoned for Yisrael. That is why he merited to become a Shali'ach of Hashem and a Shali'ach of Yisrael 4 to perform the Avodah in the Mishkan and in the Beis-Hamikdash.


1

R. Bachye: As the Torah writes in Sh?mos 21:14 ?me?Im Mizb?chi Tikachnu Lamus?. See R. Bachye.

2

See R. Chavel?s footnotes, note 50

3

Seforno: As a result of which he received the Kehunah, granting him a mandate to atone for the people as a Kohen.

4

See Oznayim la'Torah DH 'Tachas asher Kinei l'Elokav' #1.

9)

Why does the Torah say here "B'ris Kehunas Olam" and "B'risi Shalom", when regarding Aharon, it says "Lo u'le'Zar'o Acharav Kehunas Olam"?

1.

Moshav Zekenim: Because Pinchas received "B'risi Shalom" - a B'ris with Shalom attached, as a reward for his zealous act, whereas Aharon had received the Kehunah "le'Chavod u'le'Sifares. (Sh'mos 28:2)."

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:
Month: Day: Year:
Month: Day: Year:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & DonationsReaders' FeedbackMailing ListsTalmud ArchivesAsk the KollelDafyomi WeblinksDafyomi CalendarOther Yomi calendars