WHEN A QUARTER KAV BECOMES BATEL (Yerushalmi Kilayim Perek 2 Halachah 1 Daf 6b)
éîòè: ëàéæä öã äåà îîòè àå ôåçú îï øåáò àå îåñéó òì äñàä.
Question? The Mishnah taught that (if it has in it a quarter Kav of another seed), he must reduce it. How must he reduce it? By reducing the quarter or by increasing the Seah? (The Gemara leaves this question unanswered.)
ìà ëï àîø )øáé éåçðï( ø' àáäå áùí øáé éåçðï ëì äàéñåøéï ùøéáä òìéäï ùåââ îåúø îæéã àñåø.
Question: Didn't R. Abahu teach from R. Yochanan - Any prohibition that was rendered Batel by inadvertently increasing the permitted one - it's permitted. If it was done intentionally, it's prohibited. But here he's doing it intentionally?
úîï àú îøáä ìáèì àéñåø úåøä áøí äëà àú îøáä ìáèì îôðé îøàéú òéï:
Answer: There, you are increasing the permitted one to negate the prohibited one. Here, you are reducing merely because of the Rabbinic prohibition of Maris HaAyin which they permitted actively reducing.
øáé éåñé àåîø éáåø: î"è ãø' éåñé îëéåï ùäúçéì áøåáò öøéê ìäùìéí àú ëì äøåáò.
The Mishnah taught - R. Yosi said that he should remove all of the quarter Kav, (whether it contains one or two species). What's his reasoning for removing all of it? Once he begins to remove it, he should remove all of it.
îåãä øáé éåñé ùàí äéä ùí ôçåú îï äøåáò îùòä øàùåðä àéðå æ÷å÷ ìå.
R. Yosi agrees that if there was originally less than an a quarter, he does not need to fix it.
äéàê òáéãä äéä ùí øåáò àçã îùðé îéðéï áåøø îéï àçã åãéå. àå öøéê ìáåø àú ëåìå.
Question: If there was a quarter Kav comprising of two species - is he obligated to remove only one of those two species or both of them? (The Gemara leaves this question unanswered.)
ø' ùîòåï àåîø ìà àîøå àìà îéï àçã ùðé îéðéï ìà. òã äéëï
Question: The Mishnah taught that R. Shimon says - The prohibition of a quarter Kav of another seed is only if it is entirely from one type of seed. How much of the mixture can consist of these multiple types of seeds (as long as no one type is a quarter Kav).
òã øåáä ùì ñàä.
Answer: Until a quarter of the Seah.
çæø åäåñéó çæøä úáåàä ìäúéøä.
Question: If he added more of the primary produce to the Seah, the mixture again becomes permitted.
[ãó éà òîåã á (òåæ åäãø)] ëîä ãø"ù àîø àéï ùðé îéðéï îöèøôéï ìàñåø. ëï äåà àåîø äëà àéï ùðé îéðéï îöèøôéï ìäéúø:
Just as R. Shimon said that two species don't combine to prohibit, so too he says here that two species don't combine to permit...
äéàê òáéãà äéä ùí òùøéí åùðéí øáòéí åîçöä ùì çéèéí åçöé øåáò ùòåøéï åðôì ìúåëå ôçåú îøåáò òãùéí àôé' ëï àéï ùðé îéðéï îöèøôé' ìäéúø:
How is that? If there were 221/2 quarters of wheat and a 1/2 quarter of barley (it is still permitted, since there isn't a quarter in 24 quarters; but on the other hand, they do not combine to be considered one species, so) if less than a quarter of lentils then fell in, since the barley doesn't combine with the wheat to permit, there isn't enough wheat to permit it because of the lentils that fell in.