1) TOSFOS DH Simana b'Alma
úåñôåú ã"ä ñéîðà áòìîà
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why he gave a Siman.)
ìâéøñà ùìà úèòä åùìà úùëç áàéæä îðçä à''ø éäåãä ëé òì éãé èòí æä àúå ìàãëåøé âîøà:
(a) Explanation: [He gives a mere Siman] for the text, lest one err or forget which Minchah R. Yehudah said. Through this reason, people will remember the teaching.
2) TOSFOS DH l'Macharas Mevi Ashamo v'Lugo
úåñôåú ã"ä ìîçøú îáéà àùîå åìåâå
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains the Taharah of a Safek Nazir Tamei, Safek Metzora Muchlat.)
ôéøù á÷åðèøñ ìîçøú éåí ùùéí
(a) Explanation #1 (Rashi): [He brings the Asham and oil] on the morrow of day 60.
åáæáçéí (ãó òå.) ôéøù ìîçøú éåí ùîéðé
(b) Explanation #2 (Rashi in Zevachim 76a): [He brings them] on the morrow of day eight.
åäëì àçã ãàñô÷ ðæéø èîà åàñô÷ îöåøò èîà ÷àé ëãîåëç áúåñôúà ãðæéø ôø÷ áúøà
(c) Resolution: Both of these are the same. It refers to a Safek Nazir Tamei, Safek Metzora Tamei, like is proven in the Tosefta of Nazir (6:1);
åäëé àéúà äúí ñô÷ ðæéø èîà åñô÷ ðæéø èäåø àáì ðæéø åãàé äéä ñô÷ îöåøò èîà ôé' îåçìè ñô÷ îöåøò èäåø ôé' (ùèäåø) [ö"ì ùèéäø - ùéèä î÷åáöú] ëáø àáì îöåøò åãàé äéä ôé' áçã âáøà àééøé ùéù áå ñôé÷åú äììå
1. It says there that a Safek Nazir Tamei, Safek Metzora Tamei, but he was a Vadai Nazir. He was a Safek Metzora Tamei, i.e. a Muchlat, and a Safek Metzora Tahor, i.e. that he became Tahor already, but he Vadai was a Metzora. I.e. we discuss one person with all these Sefekos.
àåëì á÷ãùéí ìàçø ùùéí éåí åùåúä ééï åîéèîà ìîúéí ìàçø ÷''ë éåí ëéöã àîøå ìå ðæéø èîà àúä [åàéï ðæéø èîà îâìç àìà òã ùáòä] öà åîðä ùáòä äæä åùðä åâìç åäáà ÷øáï
2. Citation (6:1): He eats Kodshim after 60 days, and may drink wine and become Tamei Mes after 120 days. How is this? They tell him "you are a Nazir Tamei, and a Nazir Tamei may not shave until seven days. Go count seven, receive Haza'ah [of Mei Chatas on day three] and again [on day seven], shave and bring the Korban."
îðä ùáòä [ö"ì åäæä åùðä - öàï ÷ãùéí áæáçéí] åîá÷ù ìâìç àîøå ìå ðæéø èäåø àúä åàéï èäåø îâìç ôçåú îì' éåí öà åîðä ë''â ìäùìéí (ìæ') [ö"ì ì' - ùéèä î÷åáöú, öàï ÷ãùéí]
3. Citation (cont.): He counted seven, received Haza'ah and repeated, and he wants to shave. They tell him "you are a Nazir Tahor, and a Nazir Tahor may not shave before 30 days. Go count [another] 23 days to complete the 30."
îðä ì' åîá÷ù ìâìç à''ì ðæéø èäåø àúä åàéï èäåø îâìç àìà òì äãîéí ôéøåù (ùìù) [ö"ì òã ùéæøå÷ òìéå äãí ãùìù - öàï ÷ãùéí] áäîåú çééá ìäáéà çèàú òåìä åùìîéí åòì àçã îäí éëåì ìâìç
4. Citation (cont.): He counted [the rest of the] 30, and he wants to shave. They tell him "you are a Nazir Tahor, and a Nazir Tahor may shave only on blood", i.e. after they did Zerikas Dam for him, for he must bring three animals - Chatas, Olah and Shelamim. He can shave on [any] one of them.
åçèàú áäîä àéðä áàä òì äñô÷ åùìîé ðæéø ðîé èòåï úðåôä åæä àéï éëåì ìäðéó îôðé ùäåà ñô÷ îöåøò èîà àáì òåìä éëåì ìäáéà òì úðàé
5. Explanation: Chatas Behemah is not brought amidst Safek. And also Shalmei Nazir requires Tenufah, and he cannot wave, for he is a Safek Metzora Tamei (he cannot enter the Azarah). However, he can bring Olah with a stipulation;
åäééðå ã÷úðé ëéöã äåà òåùä îáéà òåìú áäîä åîúðä òìéä åàåîø àí èäåø àðé äøé æå çåáä åàí ìàå äøé æå ðãáä
6. Support: This is what it teaches [there] 'how does he do? He brings Olas Behemah and stipulates about it, and says "if I am Tahor, this is Chovah. If not, it is Nedavah."'
ëéöã äåà òåùä ìäçîéø òìéå îáéà ôééìé ùì çøñ çãùä åðåúðéï ìúåëä øáéòéú îéí çééí åîáéà ùðé öéôåøé ãøåø ôéøåù ëãéï ëì îöåøòéï áéåí úâìçúí åçèàú äòåó
7. [The Tosefta continues] what does he do to be stringent about [the Safek]? He brings a new flask of Cheres, and puts a Revi'is of Mayim Chayim (flowing water) in it, like the law of any Metzora on the day he shaves, and Chatas ha'Of;
ôé' ëãéï ðæéø èîà ãùîà èîà äåà åúâìçú æå ùì èåîàä åàéðå îúçéì ðæéøåú èäøä òã ùéáéà çèàúå ùì èåîàä ùçèàúå îòëáúå îìîðåú ðæéøåú èäøä
i. Explanation: [Chatas ha'Of] is like the law of a Nazir Tamei, for perhaps he is Tamei, and this is Tiglachas Tum'ah. He does not begin Nezirus Taharah until he brings his Chatas of Tum'ah, for his Chatas is Me'akev him from counting Nezirus Taharah;
àáì àùîå àéðå îòëáå åîùéâìç úâìçú èåîàä äåà àñåø ìâìç òã ùéîðä ðæéøåú èäøä
ii. However, his Asham is not Me'akev him, and from when he shaves Tiglachas Tum'ah he may not shave until he counts [and finishes] Nezirus Taharah.
åìäëé öøéê ìäáéà çèàú ðæéøåú èåîàä ìîðåú ðæéøåú èäøä åìâìç áñåôä ìèäøú öøòúå
(d) Explanation: Therefore, he needs to bring a Chatas of Nezirus Tum'ah in order to count Nezirus Taharah and to shave at the end for Taharah from his Tzara'as;
åàùí éùää òã úâìçú (äèåîàä) [ö"ì ùðééä - öàï ÷ãùéí áæáçéí] ùéòùä àçøé èäøúå áåãàé îï äöøòú ùàåúä úòìä ìå åãàé ìèåîàú ðæøå ëîå ùîôøù áñåó äáøééúà
1. He delays the Asham until the second shaving that he does after Vadai Taharah from Tzara'as, for that Vadai counts for him for his Tum'ah of Nezirus, like it explains at the end of the Beraisa;
ãéîé öøòúå àéï òåìéï ìå ìéîé ðæøå åúâìçú öøòúå àéðä òåìä ìúâìçú ðæøå ëãàîø áôø÷ îé ùàîø äøéðé ðæéø îâìç (ðæéø éæ:) åáôø÷ ùðé ðæéøéí (ùí )ñè:) [ðøàä ùö"ì ñ:])
2. This is because the days of his Tzara'as do not count for the days of his Nezirus, and the Tiglachas for Tzara'as does not count for the shaving needed for for his Nezirus, like it says in Nazir (17b, 60b).
åîä ùîáéà çèàúå áéåí úâìçúå
(e) Implied question: Why does he bring his Chatas on the day he shaves?
äééðå ëøáé ò÷éáà ãàîø áîñëú ðæéø (ãó îã:) àí âéìç áùîéðé îáéà ÷øáðåúéå áå áéåí åäëé ðîé äåé ëâéìç áùîéðé ùäøé ùéää úâìçúå
(f) Answer: This is like R. Akiva, who says in Nazir (44b) that if he shaved on the eighth day he brings his Korbanos that day. Also here it is as if he shaved on the eighth day, for he delayed his shaving.
åîúðä òì çèàúå åàåîø àí èîà àðé çèàú îçåáúé åòåìä ðãáä ôé' òåìä ùàîøðå ìîòìä
(g) Explanation (cont.): He stipulates about his Chatas, and says "if I am Tamei, the Chatas is my Chiyuv, and the Olah is Nedavah." This refers to the Olah mentioned above;
åàí èäåø àðé òåìä îçåáúé åçèàú äòåó ñô÷ îâìç øàùå åæ÷ðå åâáåú òéðéå ëãøê ùäîöåøòéí îâìçéï
1. "And if I am Tahor, the Olah is my Chiyuv, and Chatas ha'Of is [permitted to bring amidst] Safek." He shaves his head, beard, and eyebrows, the way Metzora'im shave.
i. Note: Since he is only a Safek Metzora, he has no Heter to shave his beard! Avnei Nezer (YD 86:6, b'Hagahah) says that he uses a potion to make the hair of the beard fall out, and also the Pe'os, and shaves the rest. (The first Tiglachas is a Mitzvah, and overrides the Isur to cut the Pe'os, but perhaps the second shaving is not a Mitzvah, e.g. he was a Nazir Tahor and not a Metzora.) A potion is needed only for the five corners of the beard. Tosfos means that he shaves the rest. (Then, they knew where the corners are.) In Nazir 57b, Shmuel said that we discuss a woman or minor. We need not say that he excludes a man using a potion. Rather, he teaches unlike the version that permits a male adult Safek Nazir to shave, i.e. for the Torah permits Hakafah of the entire head. (This answers the Magihah's question against the Avnei Nezer.)
[ö"ì åñåôø ùìùéí éåí - öàï ÷ãùéí, èäøú ä÷åãù] åîáéà òåìú áäîä åîúðä òìéä ëå' (åñåôø ùìùéí éåí åîáéà òåìú áäîä ëå' - öàï ÷ãùéí, èäøú ä÷åãù îåç÷å) ùäøé ñô÷ ðæéøåú èäøä äåà îåðä åàéðå éëåì ìâìç úâìçú ùðéä ìöøòúå òã ùéæøå÷ òìéå àçã îï äãîéí
2. He counts 30 days and brings Olas Behemah and stipulates about it, for he counts Safek Nezirus Taharah, and he cannot shave the second shaving for his Tzara'as until one of the bloods is thrown for him;
åîáéà òåìä åçèàú (åùìîéí åãàé òåìú áäîä åéùää( [ö"ì äòåó åùìîéí éùää - èäøú ä÷åãù] òã ñåó ðæéøåú èäøä ùàçø èäøú öøòúå ùòåìä áåãàé
3. He brings Olas and Chatas ha'Of, and he delays Shelamim until the end of Nezirus Taharah, which is after Vadai Taharah from his Tzara'as. (Really, he delays it until the fourth shaving.)
åàåîø àí èîà àðé ôéøåù àí èîà äééúé áúâìçú øàùåðä äòåìä øàùåðä ðãáä äéúä åæå úäéä çåáä åçèàú äòåó ùäáàúé áúâìçú øàùåðä îçåáúé
4. He says "if I am Tamei", i.e. if I was Tamei at the first Tiglachas, the first Olah was Nedavah, and this is Chovah, and the Chatas ha'Of I brought at the first shaving was my Chovah;
åàí èäåø àðé òåìä øàùåðä çåáä åæå ðãáä ùúâìçú æå ùì òëùéå àéðä ëìåí åçèàú äòåó ñô÷ åîâìç øàùå åæ÷ðå åâáåú òéðéå ëãøê îöåøòéí
5. And if I am Tahor, the first Olah was Chovah, and this is Nedavah, for the Tiglachas now is not anything, and Chatas ha'Of is Safek. He shaves his head, beard, and eyebrows, the way Metzora'im shave.
åúâìçú æå äéúä øàåéä ìòùåú áñåó æ' éîé ñôéøä úâìçúå øàùåðä àáì ìà äéä éëåì îùåí ãâéìåç ñô÷ îöåøò àéðå ãåçä àéñåø âéìåç ãðæéø
6. It was proper that this Tiglachas be at the end of seven days of Sefirah from the first Tiglachas, but he could not, because shaving a Safek Metzora does not override shaving a Nazir. (This Dibur continues on Amud B.)
105b----------------------------------------105b
øáé ùîòåï àåîø ìîçøú îáéà àùîå åìåâå òîå áéãå ëãéï îöåøò áùîéðé ùìå åäåà éåí àçã åùùéí åîúðä òìéå ìôé ùäåà ñô÷ îöåøò
(h) Explanation (cont.): R. Shimon says, the next day he brings his Asham and its Log [of oil] with him in his hand, like the law of a Metzora on his eighth day. It is day 61. He stipulates about it, for he is a Safek Metzora;
åçèàú îöåøò ùîòëáú èäøúå àéðå éëåì ìäáéà îáäîä ùàéï çèàú áäîä áàä òì äñô÷ ìôéëê éáéà çèàú äòåó
1. Chatas Metzora, which is Me'akev his Taharah, he cannot bring from an animal, for Chatas Behemah is not brought amidst Safek. Therefore, he brings Chatas ha'Of;
åàí äåà òùéø éëúåá ðëñéå ìàçø åéäà òðé åéáéà ÷øáï òðé ãäééðå òåó åø''ù ìèòîéä ãàîø áîñëú òøëéï (ãó éæ:) àôé' äéä òùéø áùòä ùäáéà öéôåøéå àå áùòú äáàú àùí åäòðé äëì äåìê àçø äçèàú
i. If he is rich, he writes [that he gives] his property to someone else, and then he is an Oni, and he brings Korban Oni, i.e. birds. R. Shimon holds like he taught elsewhere, in Erchin (19b), that even if he was rich at the time he brought [wild] birds, or at the time he brought the Asham, and [afterwards] he became poor, [his Korban] depends on [his wealth] at the time of the Chatas.
åàôéìå ìúðàé ãôìéâé òìéä àéëà ìàå÷åîä ìäà ãäëà åìôøåùé éëúåá ðëñéå ìàçø îòé÷øå
ii. And even according to the Tana'im who argue with him, we can establish this here, and explain "he writes his property to someone else" from the beginning.
åîúðä òì çèàú äòåó åàåîø àí èîà äåà ôéøåù àí îöåøò äåà äøé æå çåáúå åàí ìàå äøé æå ñôé÷å
2. He stipulates about Chatas ha'Of, and says that if he is Tamei, i.e. if he is a Metzora, this is his Chovah. If not, it is [merely brought due to] his Safek.
åàåëì á÷ãùéí îéã àáì ìùúåú ééï åìéèîà ìîúéí àéðå éëåì ùàéï éîé ðæøå òåìéï ìå (ìéîé) [ö"ì îúåê - éùø åèåá] öøòúå
(i) Explanation (cont.): He may eat Kodshim immediately [after these Korbanos], but he may not drink wine or become Tamei Mes, for his days of Nezirus amidst Tzara'as do not count for him [towards Nezirus].
ëéöã éòùä ôéøåù ìãáøé áï æåîà ùàéï îöøéê ìá÷ù àçã îï äùå÷ ìéãåø ëðâãå áðæéø ëîå ùîöøéê øáé éäåùò áôø÷ ùðé ðæéøéï (ðæéø ðè:)
1. [The Tosefta says] how does he do? I.e. according to Ben Zoma, who says that he need not ask someone from the market (i.e. someone else) to vow corresponding to him to be a Nazir (i.e. I am a Nazir if and only if he is not a Nazir), the way that R. Yehoshua requires, in Nazir (59b)...
ñåôø ùìùéí åîáéà òåìú áäîä åîâìç ôé' ñô÷ úâìçú èåîàä åñô÷ úâìçú èäøä ãùîà îöåøò äéä åðæéø èîà åìà òìå ìå àçú îúâìçåúéå (ìðæéøåúéå ø÷ îöøòúå) [ö"ì ìðæéøåúå ø÷ ìöøòúå - ùéèä î÷åáöú ëúá éã] ùàéï éîé ðæøå òåìéï îúåê éîé öøòúå
2. He counts 30, brings Olas Behemah and shaves. I.e. it is Safek Tiglachas Tum'ah, Safek Tiglachas Taharah, for perhaps he was a Metzora and a Nazir Tamei, and neither of the first [two] shavings counted for his Nezirus, only for his Tzara'as, for his days of Nezirus amidst Tzara'as do not count [towards Nezirus].
åìñåó ùáòä àçø éîé èäøú öøòúå àéðå éëåì ìâìç ãùîà ðæéø èäåø äåà àáì äæàä ìà áòé ùëáø äæä åùðä åàôéìå ìñåó ì'
3. At the end of seven days after the days of Taharas Tzara'as [ended], he cannot shave [the third time], for perhaps he was a Nazir Tahor. However, he does not need Haza'ah, for he already received Haza'ah and repeated at the end of 30 days.
àéðå éëåì ìâìç òã ùéæøå÷ òìéå àçã îï äãîéí åîáéà çèàú äòåó îùåí ñô÷ úâìçú èåîàä ùàéðå éëåì ìäúçéì îðéï ðæéøåú èäøä òã ùéáéà çèàúå ëãôøéùéú
4. He cannot shave until one of the bloods is thrown for him. He brings Chatas ha'Of due to Safek Tiglachas Tum'ah, for he cannot begin the count of Nezirus Taharah until he brings his Chatas, like I explained.
åîúðä òìéå ëúðàé ùìîòìä áúâìçú øàùåðä åäåà äãéï ùéù ìäúðåú ùàí àéðå ðæéø òëùéå ëìì ùëìúä ðæéøåúéå îúâìçú ùìîòìä äòåìä ðãáä åçèàú äòåó ñôé÷å àê äúðà ìà çù ìôøù ëì æä
5. He stipulates about it like the Tenai above at the first Tiglachas. Likewise, he stipulates that if now he is not a Nazir at all, for his Nezirus ended in a previous Tiglachas, the Olah is Nedavah, and Chatas ha'Of is [permitted amidst] Safek. However, the Tana was not concerned to explain all this.
åñåôø ùìùéí éåí åîáéà ÷øáðåúéå ùìîéí åãàé åòåìú áäîä ñô÷ åîúðä òìéä åàåîø àí èîà äééúé áúâìçú ùìéùéú äòåìä øàùåðä ðãáä åæå çåáä åçèàú äòåó îçåáúé
6. He counts 30 days and brings his Korbanos - Shelamim Vadai and Olas Behemah Safek and stipulates about it, and says "if I was Tamei at the third Tiglachas (i.e. it was for Nezirus Tum'ah), the first Olah was Nedavah and this is Chovah, and Chatas ha'Of is my Chovah;
åàí èäåø àðé äòåìä øàùåðä çåáä åæå ðãáä åçèàú äòåó ñô÷ åäåà äãéï ðîé ãîúðä àí ëìúä ðæéøåú îúâìçú ùðéä ùúéäï òåìú ðãáä åçèàú äòåó ñô÷ àê ìà çùù ìôøù [ö"ì ëì - éùø åèåá] ëê åùåúä ééï åîéèîà ìîúéí
7. And if I am Tahor, the first Olah was Chovah and this is Nedavah, and Chatas ha'Of is Safek, just the Tana was not concerned to explain so much. He drinks wine and may become Tamei Mes.
úéîä ìîä ìà äæëéø á÷øáðåú úâìçú øáéòéú æå çèàú [áäîä] ùäøé åãàé ðæéø äéä åòãééï ìà äáéà çèàú äáäîä áùåí ôòí
(j) Question: Why didn't he mention in the Korbanos of the fourth Tiglachas "this is Chatas Behemah"? He surely was a Nazir, and he did not yet bring Chatas Behemah at any time!
åàí áàðå ìôøù øéùà ãáøééúà ñô÷ ðæéø [ö"ì èîà - ùéèä î÷åáöú] åñô÷ àéðå ðæéø ëìì òëùéå (àáì ðæéø åãàé äéä) åìëê ìà éáéà çèàú áäîä ùäøé àéðä áàä òì äñô÷
1. Suggestion: We can explain the beginning of the Beraisa "Safek Nazir Tamei, Safek he is not a Nazir at all now", but he was a Vadai Nazir, therefore he does not bring Chatas Behemah, for is not brought amidst Safek.
ìà îùúîò äëé ãà''ë äåä ìéä ìôøåùé áäãéà
2. Rejection #1: It does not connote like this, for if so it should have explained explicitly!
åòåã à''ë áùìîéí äåä ìéä ìîéúðé úðàé àå ìîéäåé (òåìú) [ö"ì ùìîé - ùéèä î÷åáöú, öàï ÷ãùéí] ðãáä àå ùìîé ðæéø ìòðéï [äîåøí îäí] ãáäàé çæä åùå÷ åáäàé æøåò áùéìä
3. Rejection #2: If so, for Shelamim it should have taught a Tenai, that it is either Shalmei Nedavah or Shalmei Nazir, regarding what is taken [from it and given to the Kohen]! From this (Shalmei Nedavah) we take off Chazah v'Shok, and from this (Shalmei Nazir) Zero'a Besheilah.
áîä ãáøéí àîåøéí áæîï ùðãø ùìùéí àáì ðãø ùðéí òùø çãù àåëì á÷ãùéí ìàçø ùúé ùðéí åùåúä ééï åîéèîà ìîúéí ìàçø àøáòä ùðéí áàåúå òðéï åáàåúä ùéèä ùàîøðå
(k) Citation (cont.): What is the case? This is when he vowed [Nezirus] 30 days. However, if he vowed 12 months, he eats Kodshim after two years, and drinks wine and becomes Tamei Mes after four years, in the same way that we said;
îâìç ìñåó ùðä áàåúä ùì ñåó ùìùéí åáàåúå úðàé åìñåó ùúé ùðéí áùðéä åìáñåó â' ùðéí áùìéùéú åìáñåó àøáòä ùðéí áøáéòéú
1. Explanation: He shaves at the end of a year like [the Tiglachas we explained] at the end of 30, and with the same Tenai, and [he shaves] at the end of two years the second time and at the end of three years the third time and at the end of four years the fourth time.
èîà áñô÷ åîåçìè áåãàé àåëì á÷ãùéí ìàçø ùîåðä éîéí
(l) Citation (cont.): If he was Safek [Nazir] Tamei and a Vadai [Metzora] Muchlat, he eats Kodshim after eight days;
ãúâìçú îöåøò åãàé ãåçä àéñåø âéìåç ãðæéø åîéã ëùéáà ìôðéðå îâìç øàùåðä åáùáéòé úâìçú ùðéä åáùîéðé îëðéñ éãéå ìáäåðåú
1. Explanation: Tiglachas Metzora Vadai overrides the Isur of a Nazir to shave, and immediately when he comes to in front of us he may shave the first time, and on day seven the second time. On the eighth day he enters his Behonos (to put Dam Asham on them).
åùåúä ééï åîéèîà ìîúéí ìàçø ì''æ ëê ëúåá áúåñôúà åðøàä ãâøñéðï ùùéí åùáòä ìôé ùéèä ùôéøùðå
(m) Citation (cont.): He drinks wine and become Tamei Mes after 37 days. So is written in the Tosefta. It seems that the text says "67", according to how we explained.
èîà áåãàé åîåçìè áñô÷ àåëì á÷ãùéí ìàçø ùìùéí åùáòä éåí åùåúä áééï åîéèîà ìîúéí ìàçø ò''ã éåí èîà áåãàé åîåçìè áåãàé àåëì á÷ãùéí ìàçø ùîåðä éîéí åùåúä ééï åîèîà ìîúéí ìàçø àøáòä åàøáòéí éåí
(n) Citation (cont.): If he was Vadai [Nazir] Tamei and a Safek Muchlat, he eats Kodshim after 37 days, and drinks wine and become Tamei Mes after 74 days. If he was Vadai Tamei and Vadai Muchlat, he eats Kodshim after eight days, and drinks wine and become Tamei Mes after 44 days.
3) TOSFOS DH Asham Zeh Yehei Shalmei Nedavah
úåñôåú ã"ä àùí æä éäà ùìîé ðãáä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses how Kabalas Dam is done.)
åà''ú åäà àîøéðï áôø÷ àéæäå î÷åîï (æáçéí ãó îæ:) ãàùí îöåøò ùðé ëäðéí î÷áìéï àú äãí àçã áéã åàçã áëìé åùìîéí àîøéðï ãöøéê ùé÷áì ëì ãîå ùì ôø
(a) Question: We say in Zevachim (47b) that two Kohanim receive the blood of Asham Metzora - one in the hand and one in a Kli. For Shelamim, we say that he must receive all the blood of the bull [in a Kli]!
åéù ìåîø ãú÷åðé âáøà ùàðé ëãàîøéðï áôø÷ äúòøåáåú (æáçéí ãó òå:)
(b) Answer: To fix a person [enable him to eat Kodshim] is different, like we say in Zevachim (76b. They receive like for Asham, even though if it is Shelamim, this is b'Di'eved.)
4) TOSFOS DH u'Semichah
úåñôåú ã"ä åñîéëä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses the Semichah required.)
ìî''ã àùí îöåøò ìàå ãàåøééúà äåé áà÷ôåéé éãéå
(a) Explanation: According to the opinion that [Semichah] on Asham Metzora is mid'Oraisa, it is with soft hands (he does not lean on the animal).
åàò''â ãùìîéí áòå ñîéëä âîåøä åàùëçï áôñçéí áôø÷ äàùä (ãó ôè:) âáé çîùä ùðúòøáå òåøåú ôñçéäï ãðîðòéï îìòùåú ôñç ùðé îçîú ñîéëä
(b) Implied question: Shelamim requires proper Semichah, and we find in Pesachim (89b) regarding five groups that their Pesachim became mixed (and a Mum was found on one, and we are unsure who was Yotzei), they refrain from doing Pesach Sheni, due to Semichah (if they would be Makdish Pesach Sheni on Tenai that if they were Yotzei on Pesach Rishon, it is a Shelamim, they cannot do Semichah mi'Safek)!
îùåí ú÷åðé âáøà äúéøå
(c) Answer: To fix a person is different.
åìî''ã ãàåøééúà äæëéø áçðí ñîéëä åëï ðñëéí ãáéï ùìîéí áéï àùí îöåøò èòåðéï ñîéëä åðñëéí
(d) Implied question: According to the opinion that [Semichah on Asham Metzora] is mid'Oraisa, Semichah and Nesachim were mentioned without need. Whether it is Shelamim or Asham Metzora, it needs Semichah and Nesachim!
åîéäå ðñëéí îöéðå ìîéîø ãð÷è îùåí ùàø àùîåú ãìà áòå ðñëéí
(e) Partial Answer: We can say that it mentioned Nesachim due to other Ashamos, which do not require Nesachim.
5) TOSFOS DH u'Tenufas Chazah v'Shok
úåñôåú ã"ä åúðåôú çæä åùå÷
(SUMMARY: Tosfos asks why Tenufah while alive was not taught.)
úéîä ãìà úðé úðåôä îçééí ãáòé àùí îöåøò ëãúðï áôø÷ ëì äîðçåú áàåú îöä (ìòéì ñà.)
(a) Question: Why did it not teach Tenufah while alive, which Asham Metzora requires, like the Mishnah above (61a) teaches?
6) TOSFOS DH v'Ne'echal l'Yom va'Laylah
úåñôåú ã"ä åðàëì ìéåí åìéìä
(SUMMARY: Tosfos explains why he cannot stipulate about Todah.)
åáúåãä ãàéï ðàëìú àìà ìéåí åìéìä
(a) Implied suggestion: [He can stipulate that if he does not need Asham Metzora,] it is a Todah, which is eaten for one day and a night!
àéï éëåì ìäúðåú îùåí ãáòéà ìçí åáìçí àé àôùø ìòùåú ú÷ðä ëãîåëç áôø÷ äúåãä (ìòéì ô.)
(b) Rejection: He cannot stipulate [about Todah], for it requires bread, and there is no solution [to bring it amidst Safek], like is proven above (80a).
7) TOSFOS DH Sham'inan Lei l'R. Shimon...
úåñôåú ã"ä ùîòéðï ìéä ìøáé ùîòåï...
(SUMMARY: Tosfos discusses how we know that R. Shimon holds like this.)
ôé' á÷åðèøñ ìà àéúôøéù
(a) Opinion #1 (Rashi): It was not explained [where he said so].
åéù ìã÷ã÷ îã÷ñáø îãú éáù ìà ðú÷ãùä ãîëùø ùúé äìçí åìçí äôðéí àáéú ôàâé ùîòú îéðä ãìà çééù áòùøåï îùúé òùøåðåú
(b) Opinion #2: We can deduce this, for he [must] hold that dry measures were not made Kadosh, since he is Machshir Shtei ha'Lechem and Lechem ha'Panim [baked] in Beis Pagi. (If the dry Isaron measure was Mekudash, they would be Pasul outside the Azarah. Rather, it is not Mekudash. For the same reason,) this shows that he is not concerned for an Isaron from two Esronim.
åîéäå ìåâ àçã îá' ìåâéï ìà ùîòéðï îéðä ãëåìäå îåãå áîãú äìç ãðú÷ãùä:
(c) Limitation: However, we cannot learn from there [a Heter to bring] one Log from two Lugim, for all agree that the wet measures were Mekudash!