ERUVIN 92-95 (5-8 Teves) - Dedicated in memory of Max (Meir Menachem ben Shlomo ha'Levi) Turkel, by his children Eddie and Lawrence and his wife Jean Turkel/Rafalowicz. Max was a warm and loving husband and father and is missed dearly by his family and friends. His Yahrzeit is 5 Teves.
Why does the Mishnah also discuss a case of the woman saying that the man was Mekadesh her, when he denies it?
Perhaps she would even be believed to forbid him to her relatives, since she remembered the story better.
Because she may not marry someone else until she receives a Get from him.
To teach us that she is not believed even MiDerabanan.
Because she must return the Kesef Kiddushin.
To include a case that her swearing a Shevu’ah will not help.
Why does the Mishnah discuss a case of when the man says I was Mekadesh you, and the woman says you were Mekadesh my daughter.
Perhaps she would even be believed to forbid him to her daughter’s relatives, since she remembered the story better.
Because her daughter may not marry someone else until she receives a Get from this man.
To teach us that a woman is not believed regarding her daughter even MiDerabanan.
Because the daughter must return the Kesef Kiddushin.
To include a case that the mother’s swearing a Shevu’ah will not help.
Regarding what does Rav say Kofin (he is forced) and Shmuel says Mevakshin (he is requested)?
In regard to giving a Get.
In regard paying the Kesuvah.
In regard paying the Tosefes Kesuvah.
Kofin speaks of paying the Kesuvah when he gave a Get on his own, and Mevakshin speaks of giving a Get.
Kofin speaks of giving a Get, and Mevakshin speaks of paying the Kesuvah when he gave a Get on his own.
What is the Halachah when one is Mekadesh in front of an Eid Echad?
They are married, even when both do not admit to the Kiddushin.
There is only Kiddushin when they both admit to getting married.
There is only Kiddushin when the man admits to it.
There is only Kiddushin when the woman admits to it.
There is no Kiddushin, even when both admit that they got married.
Why are witnesses necessary when partners are dividing their partnership?
So that neither partner can later lie of the division.
To testify that no one took more than his fair share.
So there will be three people watching one of the partners take his share, like a Beis Din.