How does R' Yosi bar Chanina explain why a Na'arah Me'orasa may accept her own Get, but not her own Kidushin?
- Her father wants the Kidushin money, but he doesn’t care if she keeps the Get document.
- Get is against his will, so his physical acceptance is unnecessary. Kidushin requires his agreement, so he must always be involved.
- The Get has her name on it, so it follows that she is able to accept it.
- We don’t make a Hekesh of Veyatza-VeHuysu to equate all Halachos of Gittin to Kidushin.
- We are speaking in a specific case where the father told his daughter that she may accept her own Get.
Why would Maamar be effective when it’s done without the Yevamah’s consent?
- Maamar is like Kidushin, which requires the woman’s consent.
- Maamar is unlike Bi’ah of a Yevamah, for Bi’ah is a total Kinyan, and Maamar is not.
- Maamar is a Kinyan done to a Yevamah, like Bi’ah, which does not need the Yevamah’s consent.
- Machlokes A and B.
- Machlokes A and C.
The Gemara compares a Na'arah Me'orasa to her father’s
- Hand.
- Chatzer.
- Unguarded Chatzer.
- Machlokes answers A and B.
- Machlokes answers A, B, and C.
An orphaned Na'arah Me'orasa’s Get becomes effective
- When she receives it.
- When her Shaliach receives it.
- She has no father, she may not be divorced.
- It depends on the couple’s agreement.
- Whatever the husband wants.
A Ketanah who accepts Kidushin without telling her father, requires
- A Get; perhaps her father would have wanted the Kidushin.
- Mi’un; we must show that to show that no Kidushin exists if her father didn’t want it.
- Chalitzah; this too is a way to undo a “potential marriage.”
- Get and Mi’un.
- It depends if there were Shiduchim made before she accepted Kidushin.