1)

To whom is this Pasuk speaking?

1.

Rashi: It is speaking to the Kohen, since we already know that a B'chor is one of the Matnos Kehunah - irrespective of whether it is a Tam or a Ba'al-Mum. 1


1

Rashi: See Bamidbar 18:18.

2)

What are the implications of "Shanah be'Shanah"?

1.

Rashi #1: It implies that one may not hold back a B'chor from the Kohen until the year after it is born. 1

2.

Rashi #2: It implies that one is permitted to eat a B'chor from one year to the next. Assuming it is offered on the last day of its year, it may be eaten on the first day of the following year - which teaches us that a B'chor may be eaten for two days and the night in between


1

Refer to 14:23:3:1.

2

See Torah Temimah, note 80. On the other hand, the same words also imply that a B'chor does not become Pasul from one year to the next. See Torah Temimah, citing Temurah, 21b and note 83.

3

See Torah Temimah, note 80.

4

See Torah Temimah, note 81.

5

See Torah Temimah, nmote 84.

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:
Month: Day: Year:
Month: Day: Year:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & DonationsReaders' FeedbackMailing ListsTalmud ArchivesAsk the KollelDafyomi WeblinksDafyomi CalendarOther Yomi calendars