What are the ramifications of "ve'Cheilek Lo Yih'yeh l'cha be'Socham"?
Rashi (citing the Sifri): It means that the Kohanim are also not entitled to receive a portion in the spoil that Yisrael capture from the enemy. 1
Ramban, Targum Onkelos and Targum Yonasan: It means that, not only will the Kohanim not receive a full portion in the land, like any of the other tribes, but that they will not receive even a small one.
Why are the forty-eight cities of refuge not considered a portion?
What are the implications of "Ani Chelk'cha ... "?
Ramban (citing the Sifri): It implies that the Kohanim will eat at Hashem's Table. 1
With reference to the Korbanos, which are brought in Hashem's House.
QUESTIONS ON RASHI
Rashi writes that the Kohanim have no portion in the spoils. But Elazar (and the Kohanim and Levi'im) received a Terumah of the spoils from Midyan?
Riva: "be'Artzam" earlier in the Pasuk extends to "ve'Cheilek Lo Yih'yeh l'cha," 1 implying that it is only in Eretz Yisrael that they have no portion.
Oznayiim la'Torah: That was a Hora'as Sha'ah - a momentary ruling issued by Hashem for that occasion only. Moreover, the spoils were given to them indirectly in the form of a tax.
Moshav Zekenim leaves this question difficult. He must hold that "be'Artzam" does not apply to "ve'Chelek