hebrew
1)

What if the Kohen sees a piece of healthy flesh in the Nega without two white hairs?

1.

Rashi: It is also a Siman Tum'ah 1 and he declares it Tamei.


1

Refer to 13:10:151:1,2.

2)

If there is healthy flesh in a Baheres, what is the law?

1.

Rashi: It is a Siman Tum'ah in a Baheres just as it is in a Se'es. 1


1

See Sifsei Chachamim.

3)

Having taught the law of two white hairs regarding Baheres, why does the Torah repeat it by Se'es?

1.

Ramban #1: To teach us that they are a Siman Tum'ah in both cases.

2.

Ramban #2 (citing Toras Kohanim): To learn from it that the Shi'ur Michyah is sufficiently large to contain two hairs.

QUESTIONS ON RASHI

4)

Rashi writes that healthy flesh in the Nega without two white hairs is a Siman Tum'ah. What is his source?

1.

Ramban: Pasuk 3 said that two white hairs by themselves are a Siman Tum'ah in a Baheres (and the same applies to a Se'es. If so, Michyah must be a Siman Tum'ah by itself.)

2.

Hadar Zekenim (11), Da'as Zekenim (11, both citing Toras Kohanim): "[Tzara'as Noshenes] Hi" (verse 11) teaches that Michyah is Metamei even if it preceded the Baheres.

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:
Month: Day: Year:
Month: Day: Year:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & DonationsReaders' FeedbackMailing ListsTalmud ArchivesAsk the KollelDafyomi WeblinksDafyomi CalendarOther Yomi calendars