[87a - 43 lines; 87b - 30 lines]
***************GIRSA SECTION******************
We recommend using the textual changes suggested by the Bach and the marginal notes of the Vilna Shas. This section is devoted to any OTHER important corrections that Acharonim have pointed out in the Gemara, Rashi and Tosfos
[1] Gemara 87a [line 23]:
The words "Ki Havah Ka Ba'i Mivrach" ëé äåä ÷à áòé îéáøê
should read "Ki Havah Ka Ba'i Michrach" ëé äåä ÷à áòé îéëøê (RASHASH)
[2] Gemara 87a [line 32]:
The words "Yishveh Arba'im Zehuvim" éùåä àøáòéí æäåáéí
should read "Shavah Arba'im Zehuvim" ùåä àøáòéí æäåáéí (all non-Vilna editions of the Shas; Ein Yakov)
[3] Gemara 87a [line 33]:
The words "Shanah l'Osah Mishpachah" ùðä ìàåúä îùôçä
should read "Yeshnah l'Osah Mishpachah" éùðä ìàåúä îùôçä (ibid.)
[4] Rashi 87a DH Ha Idchi Lei äà àéãçé ìéä :
The words "d'Ha Kisahu v'Nisgaleh Patur mil'Chasos" ãäà ëéñäå åðúâìä ôèåø îìëñåú
should read "d'Ha Ki Lo Nisgaleh Patur mil'Chasos" ãäà ëé ìà ðúâìä ôèåø îìëñåú (based on Rashi to Sukah 33a, Avodah Zarah 47a - see RASHASH)
[5] Tosfos 87a DH u'Mechasi b'Chada Yada åîëñé áçãà éãà :
The words "Tol B'roch Gavil l'Torei" èåì áøåê âáéì ìúåøé
should read "Tol K'roch v'Gavil l'Torei" èåì ëøåê åâáéì ìúåøé (Tosfos Rosh; see Berachos 40a)
[6] Tosfos 87a DH Ro'in... øåàéï :
This Tosfos belongs on the next page and is referring to the Beraisa of Zevachim and not to our Mishnah (Rav Isaac Chaver, Mar'eh Cohen)
**********************************************
1)[line 2]ãùçéè áçãà åîëñé áçãàD'SHACHIT B'CHADA U'MICHSEI B'CHADA- that he slaughters with one [hand] and covers the blood with the other [hand]
2)[line 5]ëñäå äøåç çééá ìëñåúKISAHU HA'RU'ACH CHAYAV L'CHASOS- if it (the blood) was covered by the wind [and subsequently became uncovered] one is obligated to cover [the blood]
3)[line 9]áîä ùùôê áå éëñäB'MEH SHE'SHAFACH BO YECHASEH- with the same limb that he spilled [the blood] (i.e., his hand) shall he cover [the blood]
4)[line 16]åàé àîøú ùëø áøëä, äåééï àøáòéíV'IY AMRAT SECHAR BERACHAH, HAVYAN ARBA'IM- and if you say that it is a charge for the Berachah, they (the charges for taking away the Mitzvah of Birkas ha'Mazon, which has four Berachos) will amount to forty [Zehuvim]
5)[line 18]öãå÷éTZEDUKI- heretic (the Girsa in the manuscripts is "Mina"; the word "Tzeduki" is an emendation of the censors — see DIKDUKEI SOFRIM #10)
6)[line 18]îé ùéöø äøéí ìà áøà øåç!MI SHE'YATZAR HARIM LO BARA RU'ACH!- the One Who fashioned the mountains did not create the wind! (the intention of the heretic was to prove dualism from this verse (see next entry), that the physical world (represented by mountains) was created by one power while the spiritual world (represented by wind) was created by a different power — MAHARSHA)
7)[line 19]"ëÌÄé äÄðÌÅä éåÉöÅø äÈøÄéí åÌáÉøÅà øåÌçÇ, [åÌîÇâÌÄéã ìÀàÈãÈí îÇä ùÒÌÅçåÉ; òÉùÒÅä ùÑÇçÇø òÅéôÈä, åÀãÉøÅêÀ òÇì áÌÈîÃúÅé àÈøÆõ: ä', àÁ-ìÉ÷Åé öÀ-áÈ÷åÉú, ùÑÀîåÉ]""KI HINEI YOTZER HARIM U'VOREI RU'ACH..."- "For behold, He Who forms the mountains and creates the wind, [and relates to man the content of his thoughts; Who transforms dawn into darkness, and treads on the elevated places of earth: HaSh-m, G-d of hosts, is His Name]" (Amos 4:13).
8)[line 20]ùåèä! ùôéì ìñéôéä ã÷øà!SHOTEH! SHAFIL L'SEIFEI D'KERA!- Fool! Go down to the end of the verse!
9)[line 21]àîø ìéä, "ð÷åè ìé æéîðà úìúà éåîé åîäãøðà ìê úéåáúà"AMAR LEI, "NEKOT LI ZIMNA TELASA YOMEI U'MEHADRANA LACH TIYUVTA"- he (the heretic) said to him, "Give me three days time and I will answer you."
10)[line 23]ëé äåä ÷à áòé (îéáøê) [îéëøê]KI HAVAH KA BA'I (MIVRACH) [MICHRACH]- when he (Rebbi) was about to begin his meal (lit. break [bread]) (see Girsa Section #1)
11)[line 25]"åÇéÌÄúÌÀðåÌ áÌÀáÈøåÌúÄé øÉàùÑ, [åÀìÄöÀîÈàÄé éÇùÑÀ÷åÌðÄé çÉîÆõ]""VA'YITNU B'VARUSI ROSH, [V'LITZMA'I YASHKUNI CHOMETZ]"- "And they put bitter herbs in my meal, [and for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink]" (Tehillim 69:22).
12)[line 29]àå àøáòéí æäåáéí àúä ðåèì?O ARBA'IM ZEHUVIM ATAH NOTEL?- or would you like to be paid forty Zehuvim (a substantial amount of money)? This is the point in the story from which the Gemara proves that the charge is for the Berachah; see above, entry #4.
13)[line 33](ùðä) [éùðä] ìàåúä îùôçä(SHANAH) [YESHNAH] L'OSA MISHPACHAH- there is that family (see Girsa Section #2, 3)
14)[line 36]äùáú àáãäHASHAVAS AVEIDAH
(a)The Torah commands that a person who finds a lost object must return it to its owner, as the verse states, "Hashev Teshivem l'Achicha" - "you shall surely return them (the lost items) to your brother" (Devarim 22:1; see also verses 2-3). This Mitzvah applies at all times and is not limited to any particular time. Since the verse uses the word "v'His'alamta" - "[You shall not see the bull of your brother or his sheep cast off,] and hide yourself [from them; you shall surely return them to your brother,]" this teaches that there are cases when the Mitzvah of returning a lost object does not apply, as the Beraisa discusses (Sanhedrin 18b).
(b)The Gemara (Bava Metzia 31a) proves from the word "Hashev," that the Torah obligates a person to return the same lost item many times, if it continues to get lost.
15)[line 40]àéï ãéçåé àöì îöåúEIN DICHUY ETZEL MITZVOS - if an object that the Torah requires for the fulfillment of a particular Mitzvah becomes disqualified for that Mitzvah, is does not become irrevocably disqualified ("Dachuy") for that Mitzvah; it can become fit again for the Mitzvah at a later date (DICHUY)
(a)The concept of "Dichuy" (irrevocable disqualification) applies to Halachos in the Torah where a particular object is required for a Korban or Mitzvah. Some examples are limbs and blood of the Korbanos which were prepared to be offered on the altar, blood of Kosher birds and wild animals that must be covered with dirt, live animals that were designated for Korbanos, and objects used to perform Mitzvos.
(b)The question of Dichuy with regard to objects used to perform Mitzvos applies in two instances: 1. the object was only fit for use after the time that the Mitzvah first applied ("Dichuy me'Ikara"); and 2. the object was fit for use at the time that the Mitzvah first applied, later became unfit, and afterwards became fit again ("Nir'eh v'Nidcheh"). In the latter case the Dichuy is stronger.
(c)In our Gemara, Rav Papa proves from the ruling of Rebbi Yochanan that "Ein Dichuy Etzel Mitzvos," that the concept of Dichuy only applies to Korbanos and not to Mitzvos. Another example is that even though there is no Mitzvah of Kisuy ha'Dam when blood starts to drip into water (see next Mishnah), there is a Mitzvah to cover that blood if the water takes on the appearance of blood.
16)[line 42]ëùøùåîå ðéëøKESHE'RISHUMO NIKAR- when its mark is recognizable
17)[last line]ëàéìå äåà îéíK'ILU HU MAYIM- as if it (the wine) were water, and if blood would be recognizable in a similar quantity of water, there is an obligation to cover it
87b----------------------------------------87b
18)[line 1]àå áãí äçéäO B'DAM HA'CHAYAH- or in the blood from a Kosher non-farm animal (that was the result of blood-letting, not of Shechitah)
19)[line 3]àéï ãí îáèì ãíEIN DAM MEVATEL DAM (MIN B'MINO EINO BATEL)
(a)When a forbidden object is mixed with a permitted object, the mixture becomes prohibited if most of the mixture is Isur, but is permitted if most of the mixture is Heter because of "Bitul b'Rov."
(b)The above applies when unidentical substances are mixed together. However, when a liquid mixes with an identical liquid, the Tana'im argue as to the status of the mixture. According to Rabanan, the Isur can still be nullified by a majority of Heter. According to Rebbi Yehudah, though, even a miniscule amount of Isur prohibits the mixture, since the Isur is not nullified at all. (When two identical dry substances become mixed together, all agree that the majority in the mixture determines the mixture's Halachic status.)
(c)Similarly, if the blood of Kodshim that must be cast on the Mizbe'ach mixes with blood that is unfit to be cast on the Mizbe'ach (e.g. Dam ha'Tamtzis), the Rabanan of Rebbi Yehudah rule that we follow the Rov (majority). If most of the mixture is Dam ha'Tamtzis, it is not fit for Zerikah. According to Rebbi Yehudah, we do not follow the Rov, and even if there is a miniscule amount of blood that is fit for Zerikah, Zerikah may be performed. With regard to Kisuy ha'Dam, Rebbi Yehudah rules similarly, that even a miniscule amount of blood that requires Kisuy must be covered, even when it is mixed into blood that does not require Kisuy.
20)[line 2]ãí äðéúæDAM HA'NITAZ- blood that spatters, sprays
21)[line 16]îëùéøéïMACHSHIRIN (HECHSHER OCHLIN)
(a)Foods may become Temei'im if they touch a source of Tum'ah only if they were wetted at some point in their history. Making foods wet in a manner that enables them to become Temei'im is called "Hechsher." From then on, even after they dry, they can become Temei'im. Wetting food with any of seven liquids, water, dew, oil, wine, milk, blood, and honey, can enable the food to become Tamei.
(b)The food can become Tamei only if the owner of the food was pleased that his food became wet. This is learned from the verse, "v'Chi Yutan Mayim Al Zera..." - "If water has been placed on seed and then the dead body [of a Sheretz] fell upon it, the seed is Tamei" (Vayikra 11:38). The word "Yutan" in the verse is written without a Vav, just like the word "Yiten" — "he places." However, according to the Mesorah, it is read "Yutan" — "it was placed." From this we learn that when water or other liquids fall on the food it is considered Hechsher only if their presence is desirable to the owner of the food (i.e. it is as though he himself applied them).
(c)It is necessary only for the owner to desire the liquid; he need not desire that the liquid come into contact with the food. That is, even if the owner desires the liquid for an entirely different purpose, if the liquid later comes into contact with food it will enable the food to become Tamei. On the other hand, if the owner only intended to dispose of the liquid, it does not enable the food to become Tamei, since only liquids that are significant can cause Hechsher. It is only considered "Ki Yiten" when the liquid falls upon an object, with the will of the owner, that is detached from the ground.
(d)The Gemara (Chulin 35b) learns from the verse "v'Dam Chalalim Yishteh" - "and it drinks the blood of those it has killed" (Bamidbar 23:24), that blood is compared to the liquids that bring about Hechsher Ochalin. Shmuel extends this to liquids that have a red tinge; the Gemara brings various opinions as to to which liquids Shmuel is referring.
22)[line 20]ùúîãåSHE'TAMDO- that he mixed it
23)[line 23]áöììúà ããîàBI'TZELALTA D'DAMA- [we are dealing] with plasma, the fluid part of blood
24)[line 29]èáåì éåíTEVUL YOM
(a)A Tevul Yom is a person who has immersed in a Mikvah to become Tahor for Chulin, but is still waiting for nightfall to be completely Tahor with regard to Terumah, Kodshim and Bi'as Mikdash. The level of Tum'ah of a Tevul Yom is minimal; he is considered only a Sheni l'Tum'ah and if he touches Terumah or Kodesh, the Terumah or Kodesh becomes Pasul and must be burned. Chulin that he touches do not become Teme'im. Liquids that he touches do not become Rishon l'Tum'ah. If he enters the Mikdash, however, he is Chayav Kares (see Background to Menachos 92:18).
(b)After the following nightfall, he becomes completely Tahor with regard to Terumah. If he is a Mechusar Kaparah (see Background to Menachos 27:34), he must wait until he brings his sacrifices to become completely Tahor with regard to Kodshim and Bi'as Mikdash.