Why would we suppose that a Shoel is only Chayav when the object or animal breaks or dies, and not when it is lost or stolen?
- Gezairas Hakusov, from the extra word “Oh.”
- The owner can still recover the animal or object when it is lost or stolen, why should the Shoel pay for it?
- Why should he be; the Torah doesn’t mention Genaiva and Avaida by Shoel!
- A Kal Va’Chomer from Shomer Sachar.
- A Kal Va’Chomer from Shomer Chinam.
What is very similar to an Onehs?
- Genaiva.
- Baalav Imo.
- Breakage and death.
- Peshiya
- Peshiya and Genaiva.
What does the connective Vuv teach us?
- That Baalav Imo also applies to Shomer Sachar, like Shoel.
- That Baalav Imo doesn’t apply to a Shoel, like Shomer Sachar.
- That Baalav Imo does not apply to a Shomer Sachar.
- That Shomer Chinam is Chayav on Peshiya.
- That Shomer Sachar is Potur on Onehs.
What are Rav Hamnuna’s Chumros?
- That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner is actually working with his animal.
- That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner has been working for the Shoel from the moment he borrowed it until it broke or died.
- That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner was Posheya.
- Answers A and B.
- Answers A, B, and C.
Why would Peshiya B’Baalim be Chayav?
- The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one Parasha backwards, and not two Parshios backwards.
- The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one and two Parshios backwards.
- The P’tur of B’Baalim only goes two Parshios backwards, and not one Parasha backwards.
- The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one Parasha forwards, and not two Parshios forwards.
- The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one and two Parshios forwards.