Who says that a Tanai contrary to Torah law is valid when in monetary matters?
Aba Chalafta Ish Kfar Chananya.
R. Meir.
R. Yehuda.
R. Yehuda ben Beseira.
Shmuel
How can a Shomer Sachar stipulate to be like a Shoel?
Through a physical Kinyan.
Mere words are enough, like they always are.
He obligates himself through the benefit that he will get a reputation for trustworthiness.
The Gemara says answers A and B.
The Gemara says answers A and C.
When is a Shoel Chayav to pay for the object he borrowed?
Always.
Always, except for Maisa Machmas Melacha.
Always, except for Maisa Machmas Melacha, and when the object is being used by its owner who is also working for the borrower.
Always, except for Maisa Machmas Melacha, and when the object’s owner working for the borrower was under contract from before or when he lent his object.
Always, except for Maisa Machmas Melacha, and any time that the object’s owner is always working for the borrower.
Who is the first Parsha discussing?
A Shomer Chinam.
A Shomer Sachar.
A Shoel.
It’s a discussion if its discussing a Shomer Chinam or a Shomer Sachar.
It’s a discussion if its discussing a Shomer Sachar or a Shoel.
Must a Shomer Sachar pays if the object was lost (Avaida)?
No, only if it was stolen; this is what the Posuk says!
Yes, the double expression "V'Im Ganov Yiganev" teaches even if it was lost.
Yes, based on a Kal Vachomer. Theft is similar to Onehs, yet he is liable for it. All the more so he is liable if he loses it, for this is more similar to negligence!