- Why would we suppose that a Shoel is only Chayav when the object or animal breaks or dies, and not when it is lost or stolen?  -   Gezairas Hakusov, from the extra word “Oh.”
-   The owner can still recover the animal or object when it is lost or stolen, why should the Shoel pay for it?
-   Why should he be; the Torah doesn’t mention Genaiva and Avaida by Shoel!
-   A Kal Va’Chomer from Shomer Sachar.
-   A Kal Va’Chomer from Shomer Chinam.
 
- What is very similar to an Onehs? -   Genaiva.
-   Baalav Imo.
-   Breakage and death.
-   Peshiya
-   Peshiya and Genaiva.
 
- What does the connective Vuv teach us? -   That Baalav Imo also applies to Shomer Sachar, like Shoel.
-   That Baalav Imo doesn’t apply to a Shoel, like Shomer Sachar.
-   That Baalav Imo does not apply to a Shomer Sachar.
-   That Shomer Chinam is Chayav on Peshiya.
-   That Shomer Sachar is Potur on Onehs.
 
- What are Rav Hamnuna’s Chumros? -   That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner is actually working with his animal.
-   That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner has been working for the Shoel from the moment he borrowed it until it broke or died.
-   That the Shoel is only Potur when the animal’s owner was Posheya.
-   Answers A and B.
-   Answers A, B, and C.
 
- Why would Peshiya B’Baalim be Chayav? -   The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one Parasha backwards, and not two Parshios backwards.
-   The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one and two Parshios backwards.
-   The P’tur of B’Baalim only goes two Parshios backwards, and not one Parasha backwards.
-   The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one Parasha forwards, and not two Parshios forwards.
-   The P’tur of B’Baalim goes one and two Parshios forwards.