|
daf@dafyomi.co.il http://www.dafyomi.co.il
1) THE PLACE OF THE "KETORES" IN THE ORDER OF THE AVODOS
This question applies both to the opinion of the Rabanan and the opinion of Aba Shaul. According to the Rabanan, who say that the Ketores is burned between the Hatavah of the first five Neros and the Hatavah of the last two Neros, the Mishnah should say that the Hatavas ha'Neros (of the last two Neros) is done after the Ketores, and not that the Avodah of the Evarim is done after the Ketores (Zerikah, Hatavah of five Neros, Ketores, Hatavah of two Neros, Evarim). According to Aba Shaul, who says that the Zerikas ha'Dam is done between the two sets of Hatavos, the Mishnah should say that the Hatavah of the last two Neros is done before the Ketores, and not that the Zerikas ha'Dam is done before the Ketores (Hatavah of five Neros, Zerikah, Hatavah of two Neros, Ketores, Evarim). The Gemara answers that the Mishnah follows the opinion of the Rabanan who say that the Avodah of the Ketores is done before the Hatavah of the last two Neros, and that the Mishnah is "not precise" with regard to the specific order. The Mishnah omits the Avodos done immediately before and immediately after the Ketores (i.e., the Hatavos of the five and two Neros). If the Mishnah's words are not precise, then why does the Gemara say that it follows the Rabanan? The Mishnah could also follow Aba Shaul, and it is not precise when it omits the Hatavah of the two Neros which is done before the Ketores. RASHI alludes to this question when he explains that it is "preferable" to say that the Mishnah is the Rabanan. Why, though, is it preferable?
ANSWERS:
(b) TOSFOS (DH l'Olam) explains that it is preferable to say that the Mishnah is the Rabanan because the first part of the Mishnah mentions the Ketores before the Hatavah of the two Neros, and the Gemara earlier (14a) proves from here that the Mishnah follows the opinion of the Rabanan and not Aba Shaul. Therefore, it is preferable to say that this part of the Mishnah, too, follows the Rabanan.
2) WHERE DOES THE KOHEN GADOL WASH HIS HANDS AND FEET
Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim (the third step in the procedure) is normally done in the Azarah next to the Kiyor. Why, then, is the Kohen Gadol first brought to the Beis ha'Parvah? He should do Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim in the Azarah first, and then be brought to the Beis ha'Parvah. The Mishnah later (43b) answers this question. The Mishnah says that although during the rest of the year the Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim is done at the Kiyor (not near the Beis ha'Parvah), on Yom Kippur the Kohen Gadol does the Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim "from the Kiton Shel Zahav," a golden vessel which is filled with water from the Kiyor and brought to the Beis ha'Parvah. However, when the Mishnah earlier discusses the Kohen Gadol's first Tevilah, RASHI (31b, DH v'Kidesh) says that the Kohen Gadol washes his hands and feet "from the Kiyor." Why does Rashi say that, if the Mishnah later (43b) says that he washes from the "Kiton Shel Zahav"? (The TOSFOS YOM TOV points out that the ROSH here writes explicitly that the Kohen washes "from the Kiton.")
ANSWERS:
(b) The RASHASH suggests that perhaps there is a difference between the Kidush Yadayim v'Raglayim done at the time of the first Tevilah and that which is done at the time of the other Tevilos. Indeed, there is an explicit opinion in the Yerushalmi (4:5) that the Kidush done after the first Tevilah is done with water from the Kiyor and not with water from the Kiton.
|
| | Questions | | Summary | | Outline | | Outlines | | & Graphics |
|||||||||||
Quiz | | Charts | | Da'as | | | Masechta | | or Archaeology |
|||||||||||
![]() D.A.F. Home Page | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() See the Daf |
Sponsorships & Donations
Readers' Feedback Mailing Lists Archives Ask the Kollel Dafyomi Weblinks Dafyomi Calendar
|
![]() Hear the Daf |