1)

Why does the Torah need to mention that they grew up?

1.

Rashi: As long as they were small, it was difficult to pinpoint Esav's wickedness 1 - since 'a boy will be a boy;' and it was only when they turned Bar-Mitzvah 2 that the difference between the two brothers emerged 3 (as we shall now see).

2.

Malbim: They grew up according to their natures. Esav did not have aptitude for intellectual pursuits, and Yaakov was simple, and did not know how to swindle.


1

Moshav Zekenim - Above, in 25:23, Rashi explained that from the womb, Ya?akov separated to his righteousness, and Eisav to his evil! Until Bar Mitzvah, the father is punished for his son's Aveiros, so people did not attribute Eisav's evil to him.

2

Was Eisav thirteen or fifteen when he began to sin? Refer to 25:27:1.1.

3

Oznayim la'Torah: Interestingly, apart from selling the Bechorah and his intention to kill Ya?akov, the Torah does not divulge all the terrible sins that Eisav perpetrated. This is in defense of Yitzchak, who was not aware of Eisav's other sins, and who could not therefore be fully taken to task for not chastising him (in the way that Avraham expelled Yishmael). See Oznayim la'Torah's comment on this with regard to raising children.

2)

What distinction is the Torah drawing between the 'Yode'a Tzayid;' and the 'Ish Tam'?

1.

Rashi: Eisav would 'trap his father with his mouth,' pretending to be righteous 1 - by asking him how one gives Ma'aser from salt and straw; whereas Ya?akov did put on any airs, he was a simple (straightforward) man who did not cheat. 2

2.

Ramban (citing the Ibn Ezra and Radak): Eisav would place (or bring) venison in the mouth of Yitzchak. 3

3.

Rashbam: Eisav was a hunter, whereas Ya?akov was a shepherd for his father's flock.

4.

Seforno: Eisav was a farmer, and Ya?akov lived in tents ? a. with reference to his being a shepherd, 4 and b. where he sat and reflected about knowing his Creator.

5.

Targum Yonasan: Eisav knew how to hunt - people, and kill them. In fact, he murdered Nimrod and his son Chanoch, 5 while Ya?akov, perfect in deeds, studied Torah diligently in the Yeshiva of Shem and Ever.

6.

Ha'amek Davar: Eisav trapped (swindled) people through his smooth talk, but Ya?akov was pure - his heart was like his mouth.

7.

Avos d?R. Nasan, Perek #2: ?Ya?akov Ish Tam? implies that he was born circumcised. 6


1

Or Yechezkel (Midos, p. 245): He fooled his father and himself.

2

His mouth and his heart were as one.

3

Refer to 25:28:1:4.

4

Similar to the distinction between Kayin and Hevel.

5

Refer to 25:29:4:1.

6

See Torah Temimah, note 25.

3)

What are the connotations of "Ish Sadeh"?

1.

Rashi and Targum Yonasan: It means that he was an idle person (a Batlan), with nothing to do other than shoot animals and birds with his bow and arrow 1 (He was a murderer who killed Nimrod and his son Chanoch 2 ? Targum Yonasan).

2.

Divrei Eliyahu: It refers to the ?Adnei ha'Sadeh? (Kil'ayim 8:5), a creature with human semblances, but it is attached to the ground. Others were able to kill it; only Eisav, the ?Ish Yode'a Tzayid-Ish-Sadeh?, knew how to trap it Rashi:alive.


1

Gur Aryeh: Why does Rashi add this? The description implies some sort of action on Eisav's part (and not mere inaction). Rashi explains that he would engage in idle pursuits.

2

See Da?as Zekenim, Pasuk 30, for more details..

4)

Why does the Torah write ?Yoshev Ohalim? (plural)?

1.

Rashi and Targum Yonasan: Because it is referring to the tents of (Torah) of Shem and Eiver. 1

2.

Ha'amek Davar: Because it is referring to the tents of Torah and Tefilah.


1

Oznayim la'Torah: If Shem and Ever ran one Yeshiva, then the second Ohel refers to that of Yitzchak, since, as the Gemara states in Yoma 28b - 'Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov were elders who sat in Yeshiva.'

5)

Rashi says that Esav tricked his father to think that he was pious. Even simple people recognize their children's nature. People with Ru'ach ha'Kodesh can see someone and know his deeds. How could Esav fool Yitzchak?

1.

Lev Eliyahu (Bereishis, p. 87): As much as Yaakov was Ish Tam, Esav was Ish Tzayid - a master deceiver.

QUESTIONS ON RASHI

6)

Rashi writes: "The youths grew up - Once they were thirteen years old... [Eisav] went after Avodah Zarah". But in Pasuk 30, Rashi will write that Avraham died on the day that Eisav left the proper path - when Eisav was already fifteen?

1.

Da'as Zekenim, Hadar Zekenim and Moshav Zekenim: The Yerushalmi asks this question. It answers that from age 13, he sinned covertly. After 15, he sinned openly.

2.

Riva: A Midrash states that Yitzchak had spent two years in Gan Eden to heal from the incision made at the Akeidah. The Torah does not count those two years towards his age; in which case Yitzchak was really sixty-two when Eisav was born, and Eisav was thirteen when Avraham died.

3.

Gur Aryeh (to 25:30): Our Rashi only indicates that Eisav 'went after,' i.e. he began to study the ways of Avodah Zarah at age thirteen, not that he actively worshipped it. He only began to do so at age fifteen.

7)

Rashi writes: "'Skilled at trapping' (Yode'a Tzayid) - ... Esav would ask, 'Father, how does one separate Ma'aser from salt and straw?'" Why did he ask about salt and straw specifically?

1.

Gur Aryeh: Salt and straw are completely exempt from Ma'aser, even mid'Rabanan.

8)

Rashi writes: "He would ask, 'Father, how does one separate Ma'aser from salt and straw?'" Note that he did not ask whether one separates Ma'aser, but rather how one does so. What is meant by the question?

1.

Gur Aryeh #1: Edible produce is obligated in Ma'aser. 1 Salt and straw are not edible produce in their own right; salt merely gives taste to other foods, and straw serves to protect the grain (called a Shomer 2 ). Esav [pretended to] imply that since we do derive benefit from them, we ought to take Ma'aser; the question was how.

2.

Gur Aryeh #2: Neither salt nor straw are foods independently; but for opposite reasons - straw has no taste (it serves the grain), whereas salt has too much taste (it is used to flavor other foods). The Torah obligates us to give Ma'aser of produce HaSh-m has given us (Devarim 14:22) - whereas these were given to us only to enhance other items. Esav [pretended to] argue that ultimately these are from HaSh-m as well, and we ought to take Ma'aser; the question was how.


1

Mishnah Ma'asros 1:1.

2

The Shomer (protective layer) of food takes the status of food itself for certain Halachos; a) The peels of Orlah fruits are forbidden as the fruit itself (Mishnah Orlah 1:8); b) They can receive and transmit Tum'as Ochalin, and combine with the food to reach the amount of a k'Beitzah (Mishnah Uktzin 1:1). (CS)

9)

Rashi writes: "'A man of the field' (Ish Sadeh) - an idler." Why not explain that he would work in the fields?

1.

Gur Aryeh: If so, the verse could have used the term 'Ish ha'Adamah' (a man who works the earth - as it does regarding Noach) (9:20). "Ish Sadeh" means that Esav was always in the fields, doing nothing productive.

10)

Rashi writes: "Tam - [Yaakov was] unversed in such deception...." Yaakov is also called Yeshurun (Devarim 32:15; from the word Yashar, upright). What is the difference between these two terms, Tam and Yashar?

1.

Maharal (Nesivos Olam, Nesiv ha'Temimus, Ch 1, p. 205): A person who is Yashar walks the proper path - according to his own wisdom and discernment. A person who is Tam walks that path involuntarily - with Temimus (wholesomeness), without [the need for] contemplation. 1


1

Maharal adds that towards oneself, one should act with Temimus; but not towards others [just as Yaakov said when it became necessary, "I am [Lavan's] match regarding trickery!" (Rashi to 29:12)]. Towards others, one should act as a Yashar.

11)

Rashi writes: "Tam - [Yaakov was] unversed in such deception...." What does the trait of Temimus mean? What did Yaakov merit due to this trait?

1.

Maharal #1 (Nesivos Olam, Nesiv ha'Temimus, Ch 1, p. 206): Temimus means not using schemes, for that would be turning away from HaSh-m [in that a schemer relies on his own intelligence, rather than casting his burden upon HaSh-m]. Therefore, the Tam merits being with HaSh-m, he endures eternally, and his enemies cannot overpower him. Regarding Yaakov specifically, we learn that, "Yaakov Avinu did not die" (Ta'anis 5b); his likeness is engraved on the Kisei ha'Kavod (Bereishis Raba 68:12); he overcame all who opposed him, even angels (Bereishis 32:29).

2.

Maharal #2 (ibid., Ch. 2, p. 208): Due to this trait, Yaakov merited to raise twelve tribes, and that there was no unworthy member among his children.

12)

Rashi writes: "'Dweller of tents' - the tent of Shem, and the tent of Ever." If Yaakov could learn with Shem, who was the elder, why would he choose to [also] learn with Ever?

1.

Gur Aryeh: [When Rivkah had a question to ask, she went to the Beis Midrash of Shem specifically (Rashi to 25:22); because a question should be posed to the greatest authority available.] However, regarding learning, a person should learn Torah from the Rebbe that he chooses, even if he is younger. 1


1

Perhaps Rashi refers also to later periods in Yaakov's life, after Shem's passing. Shem lived until the year 2158 (when Yaakov was 50). Ever lived until the year 2187. (CS)

Sefer: Perek: Pasuk:
Month: Day: Year:
Month: Day: Year:

KIH Logo
D.A.F. Home Page
Sponsorships & DonationsReaders' FeedbackMailing ListsTalmud ArchivesAsk the KollelDafyomi WeblinksDafyomi CalendarOther Yomi calendars