88b----------------------------------------88b
5)
(a) The Mishnah in Ma'asros gives the stage for squash and pumpkins as 'mi'she'Yipaksu'. How does Rav Asi interpret this?
(b) On the assumption that the Tana is speaking in the field, Rav Asi queries Rebbi Yanai and Rebbi Yochanan (who require the fruit to have entered the house or the Chatzer respectively) from this Mishnah. Why does he decline to establish the Mishnah in the Chatzer or the house?
(c) How do we therefore establish the Mishnah (to counter Rav Asi's Kashya)? How will we then explain the Lashon 'mi'she'Yipaksu'
click for answer
6)
(a) The Beraisa gives the Gmar Melachah as 'Hachnasasan'. Assuming that this means in the field, Mar Zutra Brei d'Rav Nachman queries Rebbi Yanai and Rebbi Yochanan from here. How does Mar Zutra interpret the word 'Hachnasasan'?
(b) How do we counter his Kashya?
(c) What are the ramifications of these interpretations? Regarding which Halachah is the Beraisa speaking?
click for answer
7)
(a) Alternatively, Rebbi Yanai differentiates between two different kinds of fruits. When is Hachnasasan le'Sadeh Kove'a, and when le'Bayis?
(b) The Sugya in Pesachim assumes that the crops that a deceased Chaver left behind were never Tevel, because maybe he did like Rebbi Oshaya. What does Rebbi Oshaya permit a person to do?
(c) Like which of the two interpretations of Rebbi Yanai does that Sugya hold.
click for answer
8)
(a) We have discussed Adam bi'Mechubar. Which Pasuk in Ki Setzei teaches us that a Shor may eat be'Talush?
(b) How do we try to learn Adam be'Talush from a 'Kal va'Chomer'?
(c) What Pircha do we ask on this 'Kal va'Chomer'? What leniency does Beheimah enjoy over Adam?
(d) We have already cited the Derashah from "ke'Nafsh'cha", which precludes a laborer from being subject to the Lav of Chasimah. How would we otherwise have learned from a 'Kal va'Chomer' that he is included?
click for answer
9)
(a) So we learn Adam be'Talush from the fact that the Torah writes "Kamah" twice. How do we do that?
(b) Rebbi Ami dispenses with the need for this Derashah. How does he extrapolate Adam be'Talush from the Pasuk "Ki Savo be'Kerem Re'echa"?
click for answer
10)
(a) We try to learn Beheimah by Mechubar from Adam, using the reverse 'Kal va'Chomer' that we used earlier to try and learn Adam be'Talush from Beheimah. What Pircha do we ask on this? What leniency does Adam enjoy over Beheimah?
(b) We suggest that perhaps one ought to be Chayav to sustain a Beheimah from a 'Kal va'Chomer' from Adam. Which 'Kal va'Chomer'?
(c) How do we counter this suggestion? From which Pasuk do we learn that the obligation of sustaining an animal does not extend to animals?
click for answer
11)
(a) What do we finally learn Beheimah bi'Mechubar from the fact that the Torah writes "Re'echa" twice by Adam by Mechubar?
(b) Ravina dispenses with the need for this Derashah. He learns it from "Lo Sachsom Shor be'Disho"? What ought the Torah to have written?
(c) So what dual Derashah does he learn from "Lo Sachsom Shor ... "?
(d) How does Ravina know that the Torah does not write "Shor" to preclude other animals from the concession of eating?
click for answer
Next Daf
Index to Review Questions and Answers for Maseches Bava Metzia
