Question: What is the case? If the rental already came to the brothers, it is Metaltelim, and she does not collect [Parnasah] from it!

Suggestion: [Rav Ashi] comes to teach that she may rent [houses] for the sake of her dowry.

Rejection: This is obvious! She may even sell [for it]!

Answer: The case is, they rented the house for a year, and half the time already passed. The Chidush is that she receives even rental from the time that already passed;

This is because rental is [due to be] paid at the end. It is unlike Metaltelim.

Explanation: These are lentils, for in Avodah Zarah (75a), they asked Rav Huna "what is the law regarding these Gorgei of Nochrim?", and he said that a Mishnah teaches this;

Citation (Avodah Zarah 75a - Beraisa): Ha'Dapin veha'Lulavin veha'Adashim, one rinses them.

Explanation #1: Rashi explained there that "Adashah" is the winepress itself.

Question: This is difficult. There, the Mishnah (74b) says that he must dry it!

Answer #1 (Rashi): We rely on the Beraisa, and the custom is not to dry a winepress.

Answer #2: R. Shimshon changes the text of the Beraisa based on the Tosefta [from which it is taken] to say "he dries them", and he requires drying a winepress.

Explanation #2 (R. Tam): Even if the text [of the Beraisa] says "one rinses them", it does not argue with the Mishnah. Adashim is not the winepress itself, rather, like the Aruch (Erech Talfach) explained;

They bring mud and mix in straw and stubble of flax, and make like a big millstone, and put it on the olives, so their oil will exude. For this, rinsing suffices.

Question: According to R. Tam, why doesn't our Mishnah teach the law of the olivepress, that he sold it?

Answer: This is obvious. This is the primary sale! It is called "Beis ha'Bad" due to the Bad (olivepress);

The Gemara taught also "Yekavim". Also this is not the olivepress itself. Rather, it is like the Aruch explained. Yekavim are baskets in which they bring olives [to the olivepress].

Implied question: Also there, regarding one whose winepress and olivepress were Temei'im, why didn't it teach the winepress itself?

Answer #1: This is because it is not common that it becomes Tamei, for they guard it from Tum'ah due to its importance, for they will not find another one available if this becomes Tamei;

Also, not everyone touches it, for it is heavy, and it is impossible to move it.

Answer #2: The law of a winepress was already taught regarding [Kashering from] Yayin Nesech, and the same applies to Taharos.

Question: Granted, according to Rashi, everything that was sold is attached. However, according to R. Tam, who explains that Talfacha is a ring of mud, which is not attached, and Yekavim are baskets, why did he sell them? They are not attached!

Answer #1: Because they are not so important, they are Batel to the olivepress itself.

Answer #2: It is because this is their only use.

Assertion (Ri): These are boards used to cover the hot water, like we find in Shabbos (40a) "unless its hot water was covered with boards."